Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Prometheus WTF?*spoilers*
1.61803
Member (Idle past 1533 days)
Posts: 2928
From: Lone Star State USA
Joined: 02-19-2004


Message 1 of 27 (666040)
06-21-2012 11:22 AM


Well I shelled out my 10 bucks to see Prometheus in 3D.
Although visually stunning on such a grand scale I was left rather puzzled.
One of the cop out quotes from a character was the reason she believes in God is because "that is what I choose to believe."
Circular?
The Uberhumans seeded Earth with their DNA through a act of sacrifice of that first Uberman drinking that goo. What is not explained is why they decided later it was a good idea to annihilate humanity through the use of super nasty infectious, parasitic creatures.
The movie was entertaining on a visual level, but left much to be desired in the story telling. To many unexplained loose ends left me wondering at the end what was the point.
If the point was to scare the audience with the universal fear of a foreign organism invading your bodily orifices, then points made on this note.
The main message I took away was that curiosity killed the cat.
Any other forum members get some other profound message in this movie? Thumbs up? Thumbs down? How could it been improved? Sequel anyone? (Coffee House)

"You were not there for the beginning. You will not be there for the end. Your knowledge of what is going on can only be superficial and relative" William S. Burroughs

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by Rahvin, posted 06-21-2012 6:13 PM 1.61803 has replied
 Message 8 by Taz, posted 06-21-2012 9:12 PM 1.61803 has replied
 Message 12 by Panda, posted 06-21-2012 11:04 PM 1.61803 has replied

  
Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3976
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 2 of 27 (666065)
06-21-2012 5:31 PM


Thread Moved from Proposed New Topics Forum
Thread moved here from the Proposed New Topics forum.
PNT version of message not saved.
Adminnemooseus
Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Add stuff.

  
Son Goku
Inactive Member


Message 3 of 27 (666068)
06-21-2012 5:43 PM


The Jockeys
I was both disappointed and pleased by the Space Jockeys.
I thought the design was Titanic (in the literal sense of being like a Greek Titan), they really looked like our perfect progenitors and the eyes were "beautiful" for lack of a better word.
However I was a bit disappointed when we found out what was thought to be their skull was actually a helmet and that they were humanoid, kind of a let down from their Lovecraftian feel in the first film.
Basically I was disappointed they were humanoid, but it was a cool humanoid design.

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by 1.61803, posted 06-22-2012 9:33 AM Son Goku has not replied

  
Rahvin
Member
Posts: 4046
Joined: 07-01-2005
Member Rating: 7.6


Message 4 of 27 (666070)
06-21-2012 6:13 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by 1.61803
06-21-2012 11:22 AM


Why is the "alien" lifecycle so utterly inconsistent? We've seen crustacean-like facehuggers, serpentine facehuggers, and a giant conservation-of-mass-defying cephalopod facehugger. We have facehuggers that spawn more facehuggers through host incubation, and then finally an alien birth. The entire Queen > egg > facehugger > larval alien chestburster > adult alien lifecycle seems to have been replaced with a random toss of the dice. Seriously, "black poison goop" ingested by a male somehow causes a female to become "super-pregnant" (at least there was intercourse, but still, what?) with a tentacular facehugger of titanic proportions?
Why did the "Engineers" leave a starmap on Earth leading to their super-secret biological WMD repository? This doesn't sound nearly as dumb after the previous.
WTF was up with one of the "scientists" becoming a weird super-strong zombie after a facehugger attack and having his helmet melted to his face with acid?
Why was Weyland an idiot?
I enjoyed the film while eating popcorn. I enjoy it less while thinking about it. Doing so seems to make my brain hurt.
Edited by Rahvin, : No reason given.

The human understanding when it has once adopted an opinion (either as being the received opinion or as being agreeable to itself) draws all things else to support and agree with it.
- Francis Bacon
"There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs." - John Rogers
A world that can be explained even with bad reasons is a familiar world. But, on the other hand, in a universe suddenly divested of illusions and lights, man feels an alien, a stranger. His exile is without remedy since he is deprived of the memory of a lost home or the hope of a promised land. This divorce between man and his life, the actor and his setting, is properly the feeling of absurdity. — Albert Camus
"...the pious hope that by combining numerous little turds of
variously tainted data, one can obtain a valuable result; but in fact, the
outcome is merely a larger than average pile of shit." Barash, David 1995.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by 1.61803, posted 06-21-2012 11:22 AM 1.61803 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by Son Goku, posted 06-21-2012 6:29 PM Rahvin has replied
 Message 15 by 1.61803, posted 06-22-2012 9:37 AM Rahvin has not replied
 Message 22 by arachnophilia, posted 07-04-2012 11:06 PM Rahvin has not replied

  
Son Goku
Inactive Member


Message 5 of 27 (666071)
06-21-2012 6:29 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by Rahvin
06-21-2012 6:13 PM


Why is the "alien" lifecycle so utterly inconsistent?
I definitely agree.
Goo -> Bad sperm -> Octopus -> Massive Octopus -> proto-alien.
It was just completely random.
I also thought it was funny when Elizabeth ran out after having a major operation only to have the following conversation:
Weyland: Hi, want to head out to see the Space Jockeys, I'm not concerned by the fact that you have staples in your stomach.
Elizabeth: Sounds cool, I notice that doctor I just beat up is helping you. Anyway, must get my suit.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Rahvin, posted 06-21-2012 6:13 PM Rahvin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by Rahvin, posted 06-21-2012 7:17 PM Son Goku has not replied

  
Rahvin
Member
Posts: 4046
Joined: 07-01-2005
Member Rating: 7.6


Message 6 of 27 (666074)
06-21-2012 7:17 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by Son Goku
06-21-2012 6:29 PM


Weyland was portrayed as amoral, I wasnt surprised that he didnt much care about the recent surgery.
What had me rolling my eyes was the idiocy of "they designed us, maybe the know how to fix us." So what, totally amoral jackass Weyland freezes his geezer ass on a spaceship in the hopes of meeting an alien species that just maybe might be not only knowledgeable enough to "fix" old age, but also sufficiently altruistic to do so for essentially nothing? It's not like his Earth money is going to have an exchange rate with the "Engineers." And he even clung to this belief after they had already discovered that they had actually found what amounts to a military base for the aliens.
It would have been a better idea to stay frozen and have some scientists work out how to upload his consciousness into an android body, since David proves that Weyland had already solved the problem of age - design a better body. Hell, that body could even survive decapitation as a mere inconvenience! I want to be a David!

The human understanding when it has once adopted an opinion (either as being the received opinion or as being agreeable to itself) draws all things else to support and agree with it.
- Francis Bacon
"There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs." - John Rogers
A world that can be explained even with bad reasons is a familiar world. But, on the other hand, in a universe suddenly divested of illusions and lights, man feels an alien, a stranger. His exile is without remedy since he is deprived of the memory of a lost home or the hope of a promised land. This divorce between man and his life, the actor and his setting, is properly the feeling of absurdity. — Albert Camus
"...the pious hope that by combining numerous little turds of
variously tainted data, one can obtain a valuable result; but in fact, the
outcome is merely a larger than average pile of shit." Barash, David 1995.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Son Goku, posted 06-21-2012 6:29 PM Son Goku has not replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 7 of 27 (666080)
06-21-2012 8:43 PM


Long, long Alien fan.
Very hurt and confused. After many yeas of poor Alien franchise ( AvP I'm looking at you!) that nice Sir Ridley is only gonna do it right!
Or not, as the case may be. In no particular order.
Star Map: do the Engineers really give us a map that can only be used many, many years later? Why not keep us on file and come back later?
Engineer weapons fab: if it was 'all that' why leave it after the outbreak? Why not come back in big ol' powered armour (that's creatures 9 foot tall who look as if they could mix it up with Predators). Send some shlubbs in to recon the joint a reclaim the assets, rather than leave all that expensive bio-ware laying around, up for grabs by other space going races (us).
Wake up the Engineer: straight out of Engineer hyber sleep it has no adjustment issues, no stress over all it's dead comrades. It just kills every thing it can see and then goes off to carpet bomb Earth.
Bio hazard thousands of years ago: but it is all tidied up and the goo is put away nicely. No trace of larger organisms, no bio containment protocols stored in the same system as the easily accessible astrogation data. Random holograms must be a better way to record things than reviewable old fashion 2d images with sound.
Elizabeth's reasoning: 'I have a ship that could be backwards engineered to give humans a decent chance of technological parity with the Engineers (by all all accounts as technologically stagnant as the Star Wars Univers). But by God (my cross, my cross!)! I need to to find answers!' When David said he did not understand her reasons I was agreeing with him. I honestly could not understand her reasoning: is she going to go into the dark woods to track down that sound that was obviously Jason?
Grumpy geologist/biologist duo: 'I've had it, let's get back to the ship!'
Grumpy geologist/biologist duo: 'Mind you, don't forget how to use those tracking drones as we make our way outside following the telemetry your high tech drones have provided us with.
Grumpy geologist/biologist duo: 'How come we're not outside and back at the ship before Elizabeth and David?'.
Grumpy geologist/biologist duo: 'Blimey! This alien tube going down my throat can only evoke images of impregnation with a lethal embryo. I can't imagine me being forgotten by the plot and my grumpy associate, apparently dead from too much face acid turning into superhuman killer and returning to the ship to become a bullet proof monster who needs to kill till he dies from too much fire (never have pulse riffles: flames all the way).
Elizabeth's man: 'Where's that android? I need to be rude and cruel to him enough that he will poison me with goo.'
Elizabeth's man 2 ' Damnit I'm fine. Leave me alone. I'm all right. I'll make it. Burn me to death.'
You know, I could go on: the ridiculous Weyland's motivation for returning to the obviously deadly Engineers weapons fab. The daughter's null role in the film. Obviously evil android (scientists: for goodness sake, don't make androids!!!!!!!!!)
Cylons, Ash's, evil Biahops, that one with Kirk Dugless, the list goes on.....
It looked nice, though (apart from the muppet at the end that would have been so much better as a propper Alien).
Edited by Larni, : No reason given.
Edited by Larni, : No reason given.
Edited by Larni, : No reason given.
Edited by Larni, : No reason given.
Edited by Larni, : No reason given.
Edited by Larni, : No reason given.
Edited by Larni, : No reason given.
Edited by Larni, : All this editing is my drunken way of making sure what I write makes sense. There; I've said it.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by 1.61803, posted 06-22-2012 9:45 AM Larni has not replied

  
Taz
Member (Idle past 3321 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 8 of 27 (666086)
06-21-2012 9:12 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by 1.61803
06-21-2012 11:22 AM


1.61803 writes:
What is not explained is why they decided later it was a good idea to annihilate humanity through the use of super nasty infectious, parasitic creatures.
Scientists create engineered lab mice and then destroy them in experiments all the time. I see this as something similar but on a much bigger scale.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by 1.61803, posted 06-21-2012 11:22 AM 1.61803 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by Larni, posted 06-21-2012 9:18 PM Taz has not replied
 Message 17 by 1.61803, posted 06-22-2012 9:49 AM Taz has not replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 9 of 27 (666087)
06-21-2012 9:18 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by Taz
06-21-2012 9:12 PM


But they could have done it far easier by lobbing kinetic missiles at us.
All this convoluted bio weaponry seems really involved.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by Taz, posted 06-21-2012 9:12 PM Taz has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by Rahvin, posted 06-21-2012 9:21 PM Larni has replied

  
Rahvin
Member
Posts: 4046
Joined: 07-01-2005
Member Rating: 7.6


Message 10 of 27 (666088)
06-21-2012 9:21 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by Larni
06-21-2012 9:18 PM


The Big Giant Head in that big room of undefined purpose is also confusing. We don't place statuary in our nuclear missile silos, for example.

The human understanding when it has once adopted an opinion (either as being the received opinion or as being agreeable to itself) draws all things else to support and agree with it.
- Francis Bacon
"There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs." - John Rogers
A world that can be explained even with bad reasons is a familiar world. But, on the other hand, in a universe suddenly divested of illusions and lights, man feels an alien, a stranger. His exile is without remedy since he is deprived of the memory of a lost home or the hope of a promised land. This divorce between man and his life, the actor and his setting, is properly the feeling of absurdity. — Albert Camus
"...the pious hope that by combining numerous little turds of
variously tainted data, one can obtain a valuable result; but in fact, the
outcome is merely a larger than average pile of shit." Barash, David 1995.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by Larni, posted 06-21-2012 9:18 PM Larni has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 11 by Larni, posted 06-21-2012 9:30 PM Rahvin has not replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 11 of 27 (666090)
06-21-2012 9:30 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by Rahvin
06-21-2012 9:21 PM


That scene reminded me of one of the Planet of the Apes films.
I may be humanopamorphosising but a weapons fabrication facility would have pretty logical security protocols that (for creatures with 100% our DNA), should actually mak sense (from our perspective).
I imagine and big old heads seems incongruous with a smoothly working facility.
I know that one can tear any sci fi film apart (except The Terminator and Aliens, of course) but I expected more from Sir Scott.
Edited by Larni, : No reason given.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by Rahvin, posted 06-21-2012 9:21 PM Rahvin has not replied

  
Panda
Member (Idle past 3742 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010


(1)
Message 12 of 27 (666104)
06-21-2012 11:04 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by 1.61803
06-21-2012 11:22 AM


Shite
I left the cinema with an overwhelming sense of being underwhelmed.
Many times during the film I questioned the motivation and reasoning of the characters.
But, as I thought about it more, I realised that it was much worse than that.
It was little more than a procession of random events, devoid of any explanation or logic.
Here's a list of web-sites that provide different lists of plot holes and inconsistencies:
Page not found - Movie Plot Holes
Prometheus: 20 Blunders That Ruined The Film
Prometheus: what was that about? Ten key questions | Ridley Scott | The Guardian
And I will leave it to Ridley Scott to show how directionless the film was...
quote:
Movies.com: "Is that first planet in the prologue Earth?"
Ridley Scott: "No, it doesn't have to be. That could be anywhere. That could be a planet anywhere. All he's doing is acting as a gardener in space. And the plant life, in fact, is the disintegration of himself."

CRYSTALS!!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by 1.61803, posted 06-21-2012 11:22 AM 1.61803 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by 1.61803, posted 06-22-2012 9:56 AM Panda has seen this message but not replied
 Message 19 by Taz, posted 06-29-2012 12:15 PM Panda has seen this message but not replied
 Message 23 by arachnophilia, posted 07-04-2012 11:21 PM Panda has not replied

  
Taz
Member (Idle past 3321 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


(1)
Message 13 of 27 (666108)
06-22-2012 12:18 AM


My biggest gripe with the movie is the characters have no common sense. For example, when a big-ass round thing rolling your way, instead of running in a straight line along its path, you should probably run sideways out of its path to avoid it.
My buddy and I recently chopped down a tree. When the tree fell, we stepped out of its falling path. We didn't just run in a straight line away from it. We took a side step.

  
1.61803
Member (Idle past 1533 days)
Posts: 2928
From: Lone Star State USA
Joined: 02-19-2004


Message 14 of 27 (666132)
06-22-2012 9:33 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by Son Goku
06-21-2012 5:43 PM


Re: The Jockeys
I agree the space Jockey was a great image. And it ties into some of the early Mayan carvings of proposed space jockeys. As soon as I saw the Prometheus trailer and saw a image of the jockey I was like, "OOOHHHHHH I gotta see that movie! Its gonna explain soooo much!" NOT.

"You were not there for the beginning. You will not be there for the end. Your knowledge of what is going on can only be superficial and relative" William S. Burroughs

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Son Goku, posted 06-21-2012 5:43 PM Son Goku has not replied

  
1.61803
Member (Idle past 1533 days)
Posts: 2928
From: Lone Star State USA
Joined: 02-19-2004


Message 15 of 27 (666133)
06-22-2012 9:37 AM
Reply to: Message 4 by Rahvin
06-21-2012 6:13 PM


Rahvin writes:
"black poison goop" ingested by a male somehow causes a female to become "super-pregnant" (at least there was intercourse, but still, what?) with a tentacular facehugger of titanic proportions?
Yeah, It would of been better if the Scott stuck to the original design of the xenomorphs rather than succumb to the pressure of making the aliens more bizarre and larger. I do not think one can improve upon the original Giger designs imo.

"You were not there for the beginning. You will not be there for the end. Your knowledge of what is going on can only be superficial and relative" William S. Burroughs

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Rahvin, posted 06-21-2012 6:13 PM Rahvin has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024