|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,909 Year: 4,166/9,624 Month: 1,037/974 Week: 364/286 Day: 7/13 Hour: 2/2 |
Thread ▼ Details |
Member (Idle past 1182 days) Posts: 583 From: Roraima Peak Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: What is the lowest multiplication rate for Humans ? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Admin Director Posts: 13044 From: EvC Forum Joined: Member Rating: 2.3 |
I promoted this to Free For All because I was unable to make any sense of CD's proposed topic, but maybe others understand it better. I think an effort should be made to help clarify what CD is trying to say.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Larni Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: |
Please provide direct evidence of life energy.
Edited by Larni, : No reason given.The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer. -Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tangle Member Posts: 9516 From: UK Joined: Member Rating: 4.8
|
Admin writes: Thread copied here from the Why not see when a theory becomes obsolete thread in the Proposed New Topics forum. Well ok, if you must, but you've only yourself to blame........Life, don't talk to me about life - Marvin the Paranoid Android
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 198 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
Looks to me as if it's gobbledygook all the way down.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
hooah212002 Member (Idle past 831 days) Posts: 3193 Joined: |
I promoted this to Free For All because I was unable to make any sense of CD's proposed topic, but maybe others understand it better. David Mabus typically doesn't respond to other peoples' threads, though. He only starts them."Science is interesting, and if you don't agree you can fuck off." -Dawkins
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
The idea was Turtles all the way down but they were out of Turtles so it is pretend Turtles all the way down.
Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taq Member Posts: 10085 Joined: Member Rating: 5.1
|
A million bacteria weigh 1 mg or so, or 1 ng per bacteria. They double every 20 minutes.
The mass of the Earth is about 6x10^24 kg, or 6x10^36 ng. If we start with just a single bacterium wieghing 1 ng with a doubling time of 20 minutes we can arrive at the mass of the Earth in bacterium after about 125 doublings. That's just a day and a half. Even if we allow for a much slower doubling time, the Earth can not be more than a few weeks old according to CrazyDiamond's math.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coragyps Member (Idle past 764 days) Posts: 5553 From: Snyder, Texas, USA Joined: |
the Earth can not be more than a few weeks old according to CrazyDiamond's math. Obviously not. It was created last Tuesday.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 441 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined:
|
CrazyDiamond7 writes:
It's biologically possible though because people die. In fact, it's biologically possible for the population in ten thousand years to be zero. It is mathematically impossible that a population of 2,000 people would have taken a time longer than Ten thousand years to reach 1 million. Mathematics is a wonderful thing but it doesn't trump reality.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
dwise1 Member Posts: 5952 Joined: Member Rating: 5.2 |
Is that what this is about? That stupid "human population growth model" that everybody has known for over 30 years for what nonsense it is? The author of that book -- all I can find about it on Google is that somebody it has fooled has been posting on Portuguese forums about it -- is lying to you and is making a fool of you. Yes, as a Christian you're supposed to be proud when non-believers think you to be a fool, but that doesn't apply here. You have been taught to say very foolish things which clearly communicate to the rest of the world how foolish Christianity is, even though that foolishness has nothing to do with what Christianity actually teaches or requires you to believe. Instead of showing us how reasonable Christianity is, you are driving us away laughing our heads off.
That idiocy you regurgitated is known as "The Bunny Blunder", because if we apply your "model" to rabbits, we find that the current world population of rabbits, given the rate at which they multiply (like rabbits!), would have originated from two bunnies about one hundred years ago. When I researched it around 1990, Henry Morris of the ICR was its originator and major proponent. I published on CompuServe in 1991 and have posted it as THE BUNNY BLUNDER or What's Up, Doc Morris?. Edited by dwise1, : subtitle
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
goldenlightArchangel Member (Idle past 1182 days) Posts: 583 From: Roraima Peak Joined: |
-
Taq, What about the results from the experiment ( of creating a beginning of life outside of what is living ) ? The result would prove the inerrancy of the evolution belief. -
quote: Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taq Member Posts: 10085 Joined: Member Rating: 5.1 |
Taq, What about the results from the experiment ( of creating a beginning of life outside of what is living ) ?
Where did you show that it is an impossibility as you claim?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
goldenlightArchangel Member (Idle past 1182 days) Posts: 583 From: Roraima Peak Joined: |
Hi Taq,
There was a distinction to be made, bringing up the difference between both perspectives since the evolution theory ( in regards to the origin of life ) utilizes a common transcendental vision of the reality. This distinction is already known by the equation Emanentism Vs Transcendentalism. The evolution theory sees the origin of life in a Transcendental vision,that is 'The origin of life would have started occasionally somewhere in the past and then it would have evolved from that point. The above transcendental vision in regards to the origin of life is not even a perception since the results were not demonstrated. Man is not able to create a beginning of life outside of what is already living. Therefore the evolution theory ( in regards to the origin of life ) is not a teaching based on perception of the reality or ascertained truth of the facts. It's a belief. It's a transcendental and visionary form of believing that the Life energy and Existence would be forever slaves to Causality, as it was quoted before, There would be ’only one constant; the only real force: Causality; Action, reaction; cause and effect . Choice is an illusion, created between those with power and those without . Causality. There is no escape from it. We are forever slaves to it.' However, the Life energy and Existence is not dependent on the continuous sequence of a second after another. If it was so then the physicians would not have spoken about Relativity of Simultaneity and there would not be another sequence ( or duration ) of time which is time in simultaneous sequence. Not even the Light of your thoughts, memories given by the dreams, imagination and knowledge would be flowing in a movement and yet motionless, ( that is the fading effect of simultaneity ), if, in fact, the reality and the existence was so fused into the continuous sequence of a second after another.
quote: The transcendentalism is based on a mistake of the Human perception. The mistake is not seeing that the 'Life energy and existence never had a beginning ( in the duration of time of a second after another )', If the Life energy of the living beings would have had an origin or beginning somewhere in the past then it would be possible for man to create an origin or beginning of life outside of what is already living. What is being declared ( the impossibility of life having had a beginning outside of what is already living' ) is better explained through the Emanentism. By Emanentism it is comprehended that the Reality and the Existence do emanate from perception, and the perception is produced by the source of the Life energy.
'The Life energy ( in the Living Beings ) does not act in the action itself but in the form of action'. All things ( the ants, the bees, fish, birds, wasps and other animals ..... ) do act according to a specific form of action which has nothing to do with instinct. Investigators do know that the presence of a pattern does indicate a serial form of action, which implies that the action is not caused by instinct or past lives experiences. Their specific form of action is entirely controlled by the Life energy that emanates in the Living beings. By the Emanence of Living Light, from the perspective of the Life energy flowing in the Human body,the light is greater than times, thought and realm. When you come to be who you are[ that is, *when you become a person that can say about yourself: I AM THAT I AM ] then you ascertain that you are first-fruit of living Light If you do not come to be who you are then the reality you are in is a poverty and you are that poverty Seeing from the perspective of the Living Light ( or the Life energy ) that flows in the Human body -There is nothing coming from the visible things but from the form that you see them. So the meaning - the reality can be changed, from poverty and victim of circumstances to immortality and happiness. - 'Nothing does exist without the means by which reality and existence are seen, heard and perceived'. quote: -
Question often asked — What makes it possible for a person to abstain from incompatible foods and eat solely the fruits from the compatible solid trees? It’s a simple equation,
Exchange a certainty of death ( in case you keep eating incompatible foods )for a possibility of life and happiness. Exchange a system in which you have nothing to win,for a system in which you have nothing to lose. To initiate the immortality is keeping the garment ( the skin that dresses the body ) as new and the wineskin ( the brain and the nervous system ) as new. No one sews a patch of new fabric on a garment that is getting old. - So the meaning, It is not possible to remedy or restore, by new consumptions of food the substances intrinsically Human as the skin. And no one puts new wine ( new consumptions of food ) into old wineskins.If the purpose is that the bride ( the Life energy ) should not be taken away from the bridal chamber (the Human body) then these are seasons and times for one to abstain from incompatible foods. - Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
hooah212002 Member (Idle past 831 days) Posts: 3193 Joined: |
Brah, you crazier than a shit house rat, dig? Did momma huff paint thinner while breast feeding?
Edited by hooah212002, : No reason given."Science is interesting, and if you don't agree you can fuck off." -Dawkins
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 441 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
CrazyDiamond7 writes:
It's interesting that you call it an "equation". You do understand that the two sides of an equation are equal, don't you? It’s a simple equation, Exchange a certainty of death ( in case you keep eating incompatible foods )for a possibility of life and happiness. Exchange a system in which you have nothing to win,for a system in which you have nothing to lose. All things being equal, I think nothing to lose is better than nothing to win.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024