Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   How do you tell one species of turtle from another?
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


(3)
Message 9 of 16 (771239)
10-22-2015 4:42 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by NoNukes
10-22-2015 3:26 PM


Functional isolation is all that is needed for evolution
Is the lack of sense because you are trying to force fertility into the definition? Perhaps your definition is not flexible enough to capture actual usage of the term.
Curiously I find I am moving away from a strict infertility definition to one of functional non-breeding, especially where behavior (bird song) or timing (morning vs evening) or breeding location (return to different locations) isolates members of one group from the other reproductively.
Certainly we see things like lama and camel hybrids being possible, so they are not reproductively isolated, it is just rather impractical to consider that they would find a way to interbreed.
Functional isolation -- whatever causes the loss of gene flow -- is all you need for independent natural selection of different mutations to occur and cause differentiation between populations; the groups that don't interbreed won't care whether they are or are not interfertile.
"Species" is a human contrived artificial concept, so if the definition is not as useful in one situation as in another, then we should review the definition.
Enjoy

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAmerican☆Zen☯Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.


Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by NoNukes, posted 10-22-2015 3:26 PM NoNukes has seen this message but not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


(2)
Message 13 of 16 (771310)
10-24-2015 8:52 AM
Reply to: Message 11 by Percy
10-23-2015 4:12 PM


It didn't, of course, and even though they're geneticists writing from a genetics perspective it still doesn't seem right that they should completely ignore interfertility.
Is there a selection benefit to infertility?
Is there a reason\cause that would always end in infertility over generations of isolation?
Does infertility play a role in mate selection? Species mate recognition?
If the answers to these questions are no, then perhaps we need to look at the definition rather than try to force it in all situations.
Sure if two populations cannot interbreed we can be sure they are different species, but if two populations consistently fail to mate due to mate preferences doesn't that result in the same gene isolation?
If infertility only occurs through random mutations that are selected for other purposes and not to cause infertility between groups, then actual infertility is a random process, while mate selection preferences are a consistent selection process, ongoing in every generation.
So I would say that lack of gene flow is sufficient to define species as a separately, independently evolving group -- which is what is the critical point for macroevolution to proceed.
Birds are a great example of how mate selection can cause gene isolation via behavior (mental incompatibility) versus physical incompatibility, but we also have lions and tigers and other examples that have been classically defined as different species even though it is possible to interbreed them.
There are also cases of cryptic species that appear similar but don't interbreed. The mosquito that carries malaria has a cryptic sister species that doesn't. They look alike but one population breeds in the morning and the other breeds in the evening, and thereby became genetically separate.
Now we could nitpick and say that behavioral isolation just means we have an incipient species and that they aren't fully a new species until we have infertility; but we can also say that we have speciation for all intents and purposes, as the result is the same as far as evolution is concerned.
Enjoy
Edited by RAZD, : ..

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAmerican☆Zen☯Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.


Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by Percy, posted 10-23-2015 4:12 PM Percy has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024