Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,920 Year: 4,177/9,624 Month: 1,048/974 Week: 7/368 Day: 7/11 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   take it or leave it
wj
Inactive Member


Message 5 of 7 (8818)
04-22-2002 11:17 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by Minnemooseus
04-22-2002 2:39 PM


quote:
Originally posted by minnemooseus:
A fine summary of a more middle ground perspective. Many of the evolution side of this discussion probably have this viewpoint.
I have noticed, in my browsings of Terry's "Talk Origins" site, that "Young Age" seems to have become a more preferred term, to replace "Young Earth".
Moose

This may be in recognition that some creationist postulations involve a different apparent or real ages for the earth and the rest of the universe. I think this is part of Humphreys' Starlight and Time scenario. Nevertheless many creationists seem to struggle to find an acceptably broad term to encompass most of themselves. I think this is due to the disparity of theological and "scientific" evidences which they are prepared to accept and those which they reject and their interpretations of the literal meaning of bible passages. And "old age creationism" might simply be idiocyncratic to those creationists on that board and not be an endorsed party line.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by Minnemooseus, posted 04-22-2002 2:39 PM Minnemooseus has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by Brad McFall, posted 04-23-2002 8:02 PM wj has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024