Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,911 Year: 4,168/9,624 Month: 1,039/974 Week: 366/286 Day: 9/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   take it or leave it
Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5062 days)
Posts: 3428
From: Ithaca,NY, USA
Joined: 12-20-2001


Message 4 of 7 (8808)
04-22-2002 6:27 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by skibum_theory
04-22-2002 2:26 PM


I have not heard that any "stereo types have been broken". My brother is an elder in the Presbyterian Church a SYSTEms admininstrator with big salary, couple of kids and he insists that evoltutionists have not been given the time to come up with the mechanism. So you would open no differently unless pray tell me what sterotype broke? I never heard this at Cornell and I went there to understand as well as "sense" evolution socially. I would love to know what it is I can not read.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by skibum_theory, posted 04-22-2002 2:26 PM skibum_theory has not replied

Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5062 days)
Posts: 3428
From: Ithaca,NY, USA
Joined: 12-20-2001


Message 6 of 7 (8835)
04-23-2002 8:02 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by wj
04-22-2002 11:17 PM


Seems to me that ICR is banking on turning Humphries necessity into a universality but correct me if I over synthesize. Research universitty's are no good because they tend only to support globilization not universal joint in universality thought.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by wj, posted 04-22-2002 11:17 PM wj has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024