Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,910 Year: 4,167/9,624 Month: 1,038/974 Week: 365/286 Day: 8/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Feeling Cheeky, but have a probability question...
helena 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5874 days)
Posts: 80
Joined: 03-27-2008


Message 2 of 3 (88573)
02-25-2004 10:12 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Peter
02-25-2004 9:36 AM


I would say the following (a physicists perspective maybe):
Saying something cannot happen and assigning a probability of zero to that event are exactly identical. One might argue that it is pointless to do so but such a zero probability can have some merit. For example: In quantum mechanics you will express the probability for a system for going from state a to state b, which would read (in qm notation): P(a->b)=C*< a|H'|b >
where basically a and b are the functions describing states a and b and H' describes the way in which the system is being influenced. The construct <|> is just a short notation for a certain mathematical operation (taking the complex conjugate of a multiplied by the operator multiplied by b and integrating over R3 usually).
Such a probability can turn out to be exactly zero for two given states a and b (not approximately but exactly). This then basically tells you that your system will not change from a to b (or vice versa) for the stimulus provided (which is described by H'). So a probability of zero can make a lot of sense...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Peter, posted 02-25-2004 9:36 AM Peter has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by Peter, posted 02-26-2004 7:13 AM helena has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024