One of the most fascinating discoveries is the ancient fossils of creationists with tails. The question lingers: Is it evidence for evolution or is it hard evidence for the Hovind record?
The same Indian friend who I spoke to about the population problem of the evolutionary claim, is also a true bona fide American expert on all Creos. He confirms that even today you can see the evidence in Creationists and IDers that they used to have tails in the ancient past. However, what is observed is a loss of information and not a gain of new information!
Even better.
This website mentions the absurdity of having a tail. Darwin literally made up a story about disappearing tails so that He could explain why humans don't have tails anymore.
Here is where history is consistent with science, and such consistant history is not to be logically overlooked for the sake of politics! For Darwin had witnessed God's deception of creotionism and spiked the punch with the curse He put on the Creos so that all will know that Darwin is not the "Creator" but He alone cut off the blindfolds by His new understanding.
I plead with you forum members to consider this defense of the Origin. None of you have to die forever! Creationism oppresses the truth of eternal life and cheats every person out of their free gift of salvation who believes it and deceives others who are now soul searching. Darwin made it clearly known that there is not a Creator and humanity is without purpose (See my sig).
In considering the Origin of Species, it is quite conceivable that a naturalist... might come to the conclusion that each species had not been independently created, but had descended, like varieties, from other species. - Charles Darwin
On the Origin of Species
™ Version 4.2
