Will NIST ever fix their tables?

Einstein's nine (9) primary fundamental universal base unit values
1) Einstein intensity: (hG/c^5)^1/2/sr = 9.8601020(30) x 10^-46 cd
2) Einstein time: (hG/c^5)^1/2 = 1.3511889(33) x 10^-43 s
3) Einstein length: (hG/c^3)^1/2 = 4.0507625(15) x 10^-35 m
4) Einstein substance: (hc/G)^1/2/M = 1.6605388(62) x 10^-27 kmol
5) Einstein mass: (hc/G)^1/2 = 5.4563031(18) x 10^-8 kg
6) Einstein current: e/(hG/c^5)^1/2 = 1.1857531(48) x 10^24 A
7) Einstein temperature: (hc^5/G)^1/2/k = 3.5518626(92) x 10^32 K
8) Einstein relative permeability: (e0hc)/e^2 = 6.8517999(55) x 10^1 rad
9) Einstein inverse fine-structure: (2e0hc)/e^2 = 1.3703599(91) x 10^2 sr

Planck's non-primary fundamental non-universal base unit values
1) Planck intensity: (bar-hG/c^5)^1/2/sr = 3.9336115(89) x 10^-46 cd
2) Planck time: (bar-hG/c^5)^1/2 = 5.3904639(43) x 10^-44 s
3) Planck length: (bar-hG/c^3)^1/2 = 1.6160204(35) x 10^-35 m
4) Planck substance: (bar-hc/G)^1/2/M = 6.6245916(02) x 10^-28 kmol
5) Planck mass: (bar-hc/G)^1/2 = 2.1767500(08) x 10^-8 kg
6) Planck current: e/(bar-hG/c^5)^1/2 = 2.9722423(67) x 10^24 A
7) Planck temperature: (bar-hc^5/G)^1/2/k = 1.4169882(01) x 10^32 K

Legend's http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/
Planck constant: h = 6.6260693(11) x 10^-34 kg-m^2/s
Newton constant: G = 6.6723635(22) x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2
speed of light in vacuum: c = 2.99792458 x 10^8 m/s
Einstein molar mass: M = 3.2858629(47) x 10^19 kg/kmol
elementary charge: e = 1.6021765(31) x 10^-19 A-s
Boltzmann constant: k = 1.3806504(11) x 10^-23 kg-m^2/s^2-K
electric constant: e0 = 8.854187817... x 10^-12 A^2-s^4-rad/kg-m^3
Planck h/2(pi): bar-h = 1.0545716(84) x 10^-34 kg-m^2/s

Will NIST ever fix their tables?

Garry Denke

For those of us less familiar in Physics, please provide a bit of context. For example, state in words what exactly needs to be fixed, why you think it isn't being fixed, and how people should be fixing these things.As you presented it, I don't see any point of discussion. If you just want NIST to change their tables, why don't you just email them? What is the point for discussion on this board?

For starters AdminBen, every time I need a primary fundamental universal base unit value I have to calculate it myself. Why? Because it is not published in the CODATA Internationally recommended values of the Fundamental Physical Constants tables of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. The least they could do is publish the primary values from which they derive the secondary values. No webpage found at provided URL: http://www.codata.org/
National Institute of Standards and Technology
No webpage found at provided URL: http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/
No webpage found at provided URL: http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Category?view=html&Universal.x=48&Universal.y=14I have been asking them this for decades. In the 70's and 80's I would mail them hardcopy letters. Now just by email to the "Public Inquiries Unit" inquiries@nist.gov and to the "Feedback/Comments" webmaster@nist.govSorry, we could not find that!Why don't they just publish the primary values AdminBen?Garry Denke

http://www2b.abc.net.au/...n/newposts/1683/topic1683029.shtm
http://www.groupsrv.com/science/post-830148.html
http://www.groupsrv.com/science/about97904.html
Page not found - ScienceAGoGo
etc.See Google Search Results.I'm suspending user Garry Denke indefinitely for spamming. I'm actually surprised he wasn't suspended for previous threads posted here.You can send email to Admin to petition for reinstatement.