Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,909 Year: 4,166/9,624 Month: 1,037/974 Week: 364/286 Day: 7/13 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The people behind a great post...
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 136 of 139 (305989)
04-22-2006 5:51 PM
Reply to: Message 134 by Buzsaw
04-22-2006 4:19 PM


Re: Calling Buzz
buz writes:
The majority who tend for one reason or another have a negative attitude of the Bible seem to get inspired when one of their ideological friends inspires them with what they view as a direct hit on a Biblicalist position.
I would say it's the exact opposite of what you see. I would say that those who have a postive attitude towards the Bible are inspired to produce their best efforts to counter perversion of the Gospel and message of the Bible. I know that is what has inspired me to write many pieces that ended up nominated for POTMs.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 134 by Buzsaw, posted 04-22-2006 4:19 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
lfen
Member (Idle past 4707 days)
Posts: 2189
From: Oregon
Joined: 06-24-2004


Message 137 of 139 (305992)
04-22-2006 5:57 PM
Reply to: Message 135 by iano
04-22-2006 5:21 PM


Re: OP OP OP OP OP OP
My opinion is that people don't like the gospel and are both inspired by their dislike to write well against it/ or vote for those who write against it in cases where the writing is good and in cases where it isn't particularily.
"People don't like the gospel"? This is not specific. People for the most part don't like drowning but here we have a small subset. I'm not interested in reading through those threads but my impression from the little I've done is that it will be less than 20 people and they and Faith, Buzsaw and yourself are in frequent debate. Back a year or so ago it might have been Willowtree aka Herpeton, Lysamachus and his brother.
There is a core of evos and creos debating this forum's titled argument. The evo group could be following each others posts and noting those that strike them as particularly effective. How could this be demonstrated or falsified?
I'll also hazard a guess that it's the way the gospel is presented and defended including the insistence on YEC, Noah's Flood, etc that is what is being addressed rather than the gospel per se.
My own position on Christianity is ambivalent tolerance. European civilization is probably less violent than it would have been without it, though that is unverifiable. Thank God for the Greeks, the Renaissance, and science though.
Judeo Christianity probably helped the moral improvement of Europeans but the price it exacted for that aka the dark ages was high. As you can guess my preference is for Buddhism which over all has demonstrated far less potential for fanaticism and intolerance.
lfen

This message is a reply to:
 Message 135 by iano, posted 04-22-2006 5:21 PM iano has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 138 of 139 (305994)
04-22-2006 5:58 PM
Reply to: Message 135 by iano
04-22-2006 5:21 PM


Re: OP OP OP OP OP OP
My opinion is that people don't like the gospel and are both inspired by their dislike to write well against it/ or vote for those who write against it in cases where the writing is good and in cases where it isn't particularily.
I would say it is the exact opposite of that. IMHO it is that those of us who love the Gospel are inspired to post when we see the Gospel being perverted.
It really is as simple as that.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 135 by iano, posted 04-22-2006 5:21 PM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 139 by iano, posted 04-22-2006 6:11 PM jar has not replied

  
iano
Member (Idle past 1970 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 139 of 139 (305999)
04-22-2006 6:11 PM
Reply to: Message 138 by jar
04-22-2006 5:58 PM


Re: OP OP OP OP OP OP
Seems reasonable to me. I'll slot it in when I update next. I was thinking of trawling again through the potms to see if there were any other obvious trends that might be worth mentioning (Lfen gave me a few ideas. I don't recall though alternative gospel adherants being represented much as either potm writers or nominators but will look out for that.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 138 by jar, posted 04-22-2006 5:58 PM jar has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024