Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,903 Year: 4,160/9,624 Month: 1,031/974 Week: 358/286 Day: 1/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   THE NAME THAT SATANISTS wouldn't like to guess
Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5901 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 31 of 104 (90025)
03-03-2004 11:01 AM
Reply to: Message 23 by Yaro
03-02-2004 3:52 PM


Quietness is Wholeness in the Center of Stillness
quote:
He replies, "You have forgotten that my doctrine has many other claims. For example, I believe that if quietness is wholeness in the center of stillness, the flowers bloom in the spring, bees gather pollen, and blinkered defenders of so-called science raise futile objections to the world's spiritual benefactors. You will see that these three predictions are borned out by experience. Of course, there are countless others. Perhaps when you see how my central message yields so much evident truth, you will recognize the wealth of evidence behind my claim. Quietness is wholeness in the center of stillness.
From Philip Kitcher, "Abusing Science", MIT Press, 1982, pg 43.
Is ZZ eerily like the pseudoscientific/pseudophilosophical crank used as an example by Kitcher, or what?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by Yaro, posted 03-02-2004 3:52 PM Yaro has not replied

  
Asgara
Member (Idle past 2332 days)
Posts: 1783
From: Wisconsin, USA
Joined: 05-10-2003


Message 32 of 104 (90030)
03-03-2004 11:17 AM
Reply to: Message 30 by truthlover
03-03-2004 10:58 AM


Re: LOTR
Would that be Bob T the televangelist? or Bob Tilton the emo band?

Entertainment News, Celebrity Photos and Videos | MSN Entertainment

Asgara
"An unexamined life is not worth living" Socrates via Plato

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by truthlover, posted 03-03-2004 10:58 AM truthlover has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 36 by truthlover, posted 03-03-2004 12:18 PM Asgara has not replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1182 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 33 of 104 (90031)
03-03-2004 11:19 AM
Reply to: Message 23 by Yaro
03-02-2004 3:52 PM


Seven Years Child
Dear Yaro,
Shall you receive the eternal words being a little child?
They were bringing unto him also their babes,
[infants - like you and me are infants, not according flesh]
that he should touch them: when the apostles saw it, they rebuked them. ** But Gehh-shua [transl. accord. Paleo Hebrew] called them unto him, saying, Suffer the little children to come unto me, and forbid them not:
for TO SUCH BELONGETH the kingdom of GEHAVH of the Hosts. ** Verily I say unto you, Whosoever shall not receive the kingdom [that initiates by knowledge (not "beliefs") - TO KNOW THE TRUTH about the eternal words] as a little child, he shall in no wise enter therein.
Can you eat soon the solid spiritual food [ETERNAL WORDS OF THE PROPHECY THAT'S GOING ON AND BEING PROCESSED until the complete fulfillness]?
[This message has been edited by Zsafira, 04-05-2004]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by Yaro, posted 03-02-2004 3:52 PM Yaro has not replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1182 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 34 of 104 (90033)
03-03-2004 11:31 AM
Reply to: Message 24 by Azure Moon
03-02-2004 4:10 PM


All your efforts in order to correct me are welcome.
All your efforts in order to correct me are welcome.
Thanks.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by Azure Moon, posted 03-02-2004 4:10 PM Azure Moon has not replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1182 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 35 of 104 (90038)
03-03-2004 12:12 PM
Reply to: Message 29 by MisterOpus1
03-03-2004 10:40 AM


Seven Years Child
I might have something to learn with your observance.
"child", as the lamb has used the word, when somebody is in need of soft spiritual food [The Most Accessible];
The soft is the most easy to retain;
Shall you receive the eternal words being a child
They were bringing unto him also their babes,
[infants - like you and me are infants, not according flesh]
that he should touch them: when the apostles saw it, they rebuked them. ** But Gehah'oshua
called them unto him, saying, Suffer the little children to come unto me, and forbid them not:
for TO SUCH BELONGETH the kingdom of GEHAVH of the Hosts. ** Verily I say unto you, Whosoever shall not receive the kingdom [that initiates by knowledge (not beliefs) - TO KNOW THE TRUTH about the eternal words] as a little child, he shall in no wise enter therein.
Spiritually, if you can't eat the solid spiritual food [eternal words in the books of the prophets].
[This message has been edited by Zsafira, 04-05-2004]
This message has been edited by Zsafira, 03-22-2005 12:16 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by MisterOpus1, posted 03-03-2004 10:40 AM MisterOpus1 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 37 by MisterOpus1, posted 03-03-2004 12:43 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied

  
truthlover
Member (Idle past 4089 days)
Posts: 1548
From: Selmer, TN
Joined: 02-12-2003


Message 36 of 104 (90039)
03-03-2004 12:18 PM
Reply to: Message 32 by Asgara
03-03-2004 11:17 AM


Re: LOTR
Interesting link, Asgara. Can't say I liked the demos, but who would have thought a band would name themselves after ol' Bob?
I meant the televangelist, though; can you imagine the whole band playing Gandalf?! The scene was weird enough as it was!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by Asgara, posted 03-03-2004 11:17 AM Asgara has not replied

  
MisterOpus1
Inactive Member


Message 37 of 104 (90041)
03-03-2004 12:43 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by goldenlightArchangel
03-03-2004 12:12 PM


Re: I didn't want to say
ZZ-
You are being extremely cryptic, and you were not courteous enough to ablige me. So again, let me ask you the same question:
In one simple sentence, can you please explain what the hell you are talking about? Just one sentence, and in the most simplest language possible, please?
Nothing more. Just one sentence that sums up your assertions.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 03-03-2004 12:12 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 38 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 03-03-2004 2:07 PM MisterOpus1 has replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1182 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 38 of 104 (90055)
03-03-2004 2:07 PM
Reply to: Message 37 by MisterOpus1
03-03-2004 12:43 PM


My Ministry in the eclipsed and celestial - Hear ye indeed, but understand not...
Nothing more. Just one sentence that sums up your assertions.
IT'S MY MINISTAERIU
in the eclipsed and celestial:
"To tell people, [I don't presume who, neither judge who is the right one, not even who is the wrong one] Hear ye indeed, but understand not; and see ye indeed, but perceive not".
You'll be not dazed and confused, I hope so.
Remind me later, please, to talk about the Spinning of the Lion [How It spins speedy from the left to right - it should be a topic to be seen later].
There are different levels of understanding, but all the levels are commanded by THE VERB THAT BECAME FLESH,
Listen to the Lamb.
Don't Listen to me.
Cause, if you listen the lamb first,
so, You could finally see which kind of tree am I,
The fruit is the Word,
If the fruit is a word ("Doctrine" It means: beast, tiger, bear, leopard),
and not the Lamb's Word (Instruction-It means: to talk in the mode of "instruction", - cattle, sheep, lamb)- NOT IN THE MODE OF "Doctrine", Taverns, mercenaries, "beliefs", mary-go-with-others..
Is that you can be sure:
Fruit no good, man.
Tree no good, man.
Source: My lovely tree, that is the Scripture of the Truth:
Flew one of the seraphim unto me, having a live coal in his hand, which he had taken with the tongs from off the altar: **
and he touched my mouth with it, and said, Lo, this hath touched thy lips; and thine iniquity is taken away, and thy sin forgiven. **
And I heard the voice of the Lord, saying, Whom shall I send, and who will go for us? Then I said, Here am I; send me. **
And he said, Go, and tell this people, Hear ye indeed, but understand not; and see ye indeed, but perceive not. **
Make the heart of this people fat, and make their ears heavy, and shut their eyes; lest they sea with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their heart, and turn again, and be healed.
Then said I, Gehavh of the Hosts (Heb. pronounce), how long? And answered, Until cities be waste without inhabitant, and houses without man, and the land become utterly waste, **
and Jehovah have removed men far away, and the forsaken places be many in the midst of the land. **
And if there be yet a tenth in it, it also shall in turn be eaten up: as a terebinth, and as an oak, whose stock remaineth, when they are felled; so the holy seed is the stock thereof.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by MisterOpus1, posted 03-03-2004 12:43 PM MisterOpus1 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 39 by MisterOpus1, posted 03-03-2004 2:21 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied

  
MisterOpus1
Inactive Member


Message 39 of 104 (90058)
03-03-2004 2:21 PM
Reply to: Message 38 by goldenlightArchangel
03-03-2004 2:07 PM


Re: My Ministry in the eclipsed and celestial - Hear ye indeed, but understand not...
One sentence, please. You're being very discourteous and disingenuous.
Quit babbling and post one summary sentence.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 03-03-2004 2:07 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 40 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 03-03-2004 2:41 PM MisterOpus1 has replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1182 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 40 of 104 (90067)
03-03-2004 2:41 PM
Reply to: Message 39 by MisterOpus1
03-03-2004 2:21 PM


Re: My Ministry in the eclipsed and celestial - Hear ye indeed, but understand not...
?The Scripture of the Truth, at ISAIAH, according you, is a babbling?
Or; Is "To say the truth", according you, a babbling?
this 3-3 I cannot Post a next (have a Job).
So, let me go right?
Pleased to read you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by MisterOpus1, posted 03-03-2004 2:21 PM MisterOpus1 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 41 by MisterOpus1, posted 03-03-2004 3:16 PM goldenlightArchangel has not replied

  
MisterOpus1
Inactive Member


Message 41 of 104 (90072)
03-03-2004 3:16 PM
Reply to: Message 40 by goldenlightArchangel
03-03-2004 2:41 PM


Re: My Ministry in the eclipsed and celestial - Hear ye indeed, but understand not...
Thank you. That is exactly what I was asking. Why on earth did it take you so long to respond correctly? Sheesh.
So the topic of this thread will be focused on Isaiah then? Good. I'm glad we finally got that out of the way (I think).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 40 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 03-03-2004 2:41 PM goldenlightArchangel has not replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1182 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 42 of 104 (90101)
03-03-2004 4:25 PM
Reply to: Message 23 by Yaro
03-02-2004 3:52 PM


Part II - Seven Years Child
"Shall you receive the Eternal Words [THE KINGDOM] being a child?"
Who comes to be a child?
?the KINGDOM to us comes to be a child?
?you and me got to be children to the KINGDOM?
ANSWER: Both. Cause if you do treat my servants, the cherub angels as children [without the re'legion's malice], then my servants also shall treat you as a child [the devouring fire of the glittering white light shall not comes to devour you], and I'll know that you are a child [not a mercenary from be'leaves].
*******Zsafira.
[This message has been edited by Zsafira, 04-20-2004]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by Yaro, posted 03-02-2004 3:52 PM Yaro has not replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1182 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 43 of 104 (90118)
03-03-2004 5:16 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by Phat
03-01-2004 2:41 PM


Phatboy,
Time is the access word. Time to respond correctly these questions, AS IT IS SAID: "Be your answer "YES" or "NOT"
Do you believe in One God manifested through Jesus Christ? If so, why do you come at everyone with all of this intellectual gnosticism? This is not helpful in convincing anyone of your passion and your point. Let me ask you what you wish us to see? That the devil has a name? That religion has deceived humanity? Or that Jesus is alive today and has the power to set us all free?
Do you believe in One God manifested through Jesus Christ?
answer: YES
[the original name, the real, not a version of the real, is the hebrew GEHV-—SHUA]
If so, why do you come at everyone with all of this intellectual gnosticism?
answer: It's just the LACONIC MODE, nothing foundamented out of the Scripture of the Truth [the Hebrew Manuscrypts].
This is not helpful in convincing anyone of your passion and your point. Let me ask you what you wish us to see?
answer: See the Scripture only. Listen to Lamb's Word only.
That the devil has a name?
answer: YES, one name only. That's the reason nobody must be participant with Its lies.
That religion has deceived humanity? Or that Jesus is alive today and has the power to set us all free?
answer: YES, IS ALIVE [THE NAME IS GEHV-—SHUA, means I AM the SALVATION]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by Phat, posted 03-01-2004 2:41 PM Phat has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 44 by Phat, posted 03-03-2004 5:55 PM goldenlightArchangel has not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18348
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 44 of 104 (90129)
03-03-2004 5:55 PM
Reply to: Message 43 by goldenlightArchangel
03-03-2004 5:16 PM


Could you say that again?
Zsgeha Zsfira, I appreciate your clarity. The reason that I told you to go easy on the intellectual theology is because people in this posting board are not mystics nor are they interested in theological mysteries. They have enough of a challenge understanding me, and I am simple! I am glad that you clarified your point, and I want to encourage you to seek God with your heart and not so much your mind. The devil loves to play with our minds, and while I will respect your theology, I want you to seek Him in a heartfelt way and NOT in a deeply mysterious intellectual way. You will find more success this way. keep praying, though!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 03-03-2004 5:16 PM goldenlightArchangel has not replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1182 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 45 of 104 (97971)
04-05-2004 7:17 PM
Reply to: Message 22 by goldenlightArchangel
03-02-2004 2:46 PM


HEAVY MISSIVE WEAPON against the Contradiction of the False Masters
words from representant of Belief: ..ZZ is up to no good..
*******
I agree. That's why my name is not "ZZ".
I'm not saying that you're trying to change my name [from "Zsafira" to "ZZ"];
I'm just trying to say that you wouldn't like to spend a situation in which someone (not me) starts to change your name often ["often" means that might be perhaps a situation in which starts to do it "not unconsciously"].
*******
words from representant of Belief: ..In other words, s/he/it..
SHE/HE = HUMAN BEING
IT = ANIMAL OR THING
Is "IT" about me? Or; Is "IT" for me? What is in IT for me?
Would IT be your sage angier for me? Or; Would it be the anger from Religion and Beliefs against the KNOWLEDGE OF THE TRUTH and against the eternal words spoken also by me?
Would IT be "faith" against "FIDELITY"?
*******
words from representant of Belief: ..is essentially saying we are all Satanists unless we stop calling the evil one by wrong names..
ANSWER: I did not say that you are CONSCIOUS about the PROOFS/EVIDENCES. Let me repeat, because these words are perhaps hard for you to understand:
"I DID NOT SAY THAT YOU ARE CONSCIOUS CONCERNING THE PROOFS/EVIDENCES THAT ARE TESTIFIED IN THE SCRIPTURE OF THE TRUTH".
Everyone knows that "names" cannot be "false names" unless someone [or; THE SCRIPTURE] has shown to you the PROOF/EVIDENCE.
Soon: If someone refuses the investigation of the PROOF/EVIDENCE, soon shall be UNCONSCIOUS concerning the PROOF/EVIDENCE shown here already.
THEREFORE, everyone knows what is said at TEN COMMANDMENTS, concerning the "false testimonies",
Because If I've spoken evil, so, I would like someone who comes
to give the TRUE TESTIMONY of WHAT I'VE BEEN SAYING, and not the false one.
THIS IS WHAT I'VE BEEN SAYING MORE THAN ONE TIMES:
Let all of us know and understand that you really are SURE and FAITHFULL that the demon [whose true name is RAVB (Legion)] verily AIN'T GOT NO LEGATEE - that is "To Be Called By Its False Names".
RAVB - hebrew name that is "To be Many"; "Many truths inside" - REGISTERED AT IZSAIAH, the book of the prophet, also REGISTERED BY THE LAMB by the title 'a demon at Gadarenes'.
VERSION of the REALITY: from Vicious Vulgata and Vatican's translation: RAHAB, so, the American Standard version, also omit the "Behth" between A and A.
Dear representant of Belief,
// I Hope That You Can Declare Here, Please, And Testify (cause you know the TRUTH) I Hope So,
Tell us please, I hope You clarify your point:
Tell us finally:
That the demon (whose true name is Legion [RAVB]
- verily AIN'T GOT NO LEGATEE.
I hope you Declare please your point.
Tell us the Truth. And if your KNOWLEDGE OF THE TRUTH is that "there's no significance in the fact that Legion has or not a name",
So, declare it now, for I might know and fear and be scared.
Cause, up to the present, about this thread I still ain't got no testimony from you concerning this point.
But, If I have a good testimony from people,
A TESTIMONY SAYING WITH STRONG SURENESS, saying with A STRONG CONVICTION that ..satan.. or ..lucifer.. "are not THE LEGION'S FALSE NAMES",
then, I tell you: that VERILY I WILL NEVER TALK ABOUT THIS THEME ANYMORE.
UP TO THE PRESENT, None from the "spiritual authorities" (or; representants of Belief) has testified
YOUR CONTRADICTION: ..There is nothing in Scripture to even suggest we might either need to know it..
PROOF OF YOUR CONTRADICTION - TESTIFIED IN THE SCRIPTURE OF THE TRUTH:
"And in their mouth was found no lie, they are without blemish".
Zsafira*******
.[b/]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 03-02-2004 2:46 PM goldenlightArchangel has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 46 by Tizawiza, posted 04-08-2004 5:44 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied
 Message 47 by Tizawiza, posted 04-08-2004 5:46 PM goldenlightArchangel has not replied
 Message 48 by Tizawiza, posted 04-08-2004 5:47 PM goldenlightArchangel has not replied
 Message 49 by Tizawiza, posted 04-08-2004 5:58 PM goldenlightArchangel has not replied
 Message 50 by Tizawiza, posted 04-08-2004 6:05 PM goldenlightArchangel has not replied
 Message 51 by Tizawiza, posted 04-08-2004 6:06 PM goldenlightArchangel has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024