Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,916 Year: 4,173/9,624 Month: 1,044/974 Week: 3/368 Day: 3/11 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   clearing up
mark24
Member (Idle past 5226 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001


Message 16 of 25 (55426)
09-14-2003 6:34 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by mike the wiz
09-14-2003 5:01 PM


Mike,
to enter his kingdom
What Kingdom?
Mark

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by mike the wiz, posted 09-14-2003 5:01 PM mike the wiz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by mike the wiz, posted 09-14-2003 7:37 PM mark24 has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 17 of 25 (55436)
09-14-2003 7:28 PM


Are we picking on the believer again? I don't see that Mike The Wiz has a requirement to predicate his beliefs on iron-clad logic or points that make perfect sense to everybody, just as scientists don't have to predicate their beliefs on any component of faith. Now, if Mike were talking about the real world, asking him to predicate on rationality and observation would make sense. But Mike's talking about stuff that, if it exists, doesn't exist in the material world. So who says it has to make perfect sense?
I guess I'm on your side, here, Mike. When it's Creationism Vs. Evolution, points have to make sense because we're talking about the natural world. But when it's Believers Vs. Atheists, logic and rationality need not enter into it for all participants.

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by mike the wiz, posted 09-14-2003 7:36 PM crashfrog has replied

  
mike the wiz
Member
Posts: 4755
From: u.k
Joined: 05-24-2003


Message 18 of 25 (55440)
09-14-2003 7:36 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by crashfrog
09-14-2003 7:28 PM


Thanks Crashfrog, I really apreciate that. I agree we shouldn't have to answer every little qeury people have. One thing I do hate is that people automatically think i should have answers to everything, they forget, I am not claiming to be God, I am only admitting to believing in him.
I guess the others missed all of message 1, (take no offence)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by crashfrog, posted 09-14-2003 7:28 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by crashfrog, posted 09-14-2003 7:40 PM mike the wiz has replied

  
mike the wiz
Member
Posts: 4755
From: u.k
Joined: 05-24-2003


Message 19 of 25 (55441)
09-14-2003 7:37 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by mark24
09-14-2003 6:34 PM


The kingdom of God, as spoke of in the Gospel.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by mark24, posted 09-14-2003 6:34 PM mark24 has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 20 of 25 (55443)
09-14-2003 7:40 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by mike the wiz
09-14-2003 7:36 PM


Well, since you've consistently avoided being a knowingly arrogant and condecending believer, as so many are, I don't feel that there's a need to pick on you.
Wise, on the other hand, deserves all the picking on he can get. If I believed in God I'd be embarassed that Wise did, too.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by mike the wiz, posted 09-14-2003 7:36 PM mike the wiz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by mike the wiz, posted 09-14-2003 7:47 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
mike the wiz
Member
Posts: 4755
From: u.k
Joined: 05-24-2003


Message 21 of 25 (55444)
09-14-2003 7:43 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by Brian
09-14-2003 5:58 PM


'Yes I now the truth which means you dont! Just jokin.'
lol. at least your lightening up.
'God does a good thing by healing a disease or illness that he gave that person anyway?'
Well, I personally think that is a big misconception. Didn't someone accuse Jesus of being of the devil, and his response was similar to : a kingdom divided against itself will fall. if God gives diseases and bad things, why does he take them away? that would mean he is divided against himself, ask yourself who is the bad guy really? - I am sure it will come to you!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by Brian, posted 09-14-2003 5:58 PM Brian has not replied

  
mike the wiz
Member
Posts: 4755
From: u.k
Joined: 05-24-2003


Message 22 of 25 (55446)
09-14-2003 7:47 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by crashfrog
09-14-2003 7:40 PM


'Well, since you've consistently avoided being a knowingly arrogant and condecending believer, as so many are,'
That's a shame that you have had to suffer these people, I hope it doesn't turn you cynical.lol
'Wise, on the other hand, deserves all the picking on he can get'
You've caught me out a bit there Crash, I havent been attending regularly enough to know what he has said, I will have to catch up!
[This message has been edited by mike the wiz, 09-14-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by crashfrog, posted 09-14-2003 7:40 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
JustinC
Member (Idle past 4874 days)
Posts: 624
From: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Joined: 07-21-2003


Message 23 of 25 (55469)
09-14-2003 10:06 PM


quote:
But when it's Believers Vs. Atheists, logic and rationality need not enter into it for all participants.
I'm not picking on anybody. These are serious questions I've never had answered.
I think its absurd to say logic and rationality should be left out of the debate. How can we ever assess the truthfulness of the claim?Can I not point out that 4 doesn't equal 3 in a debate if the person has faith? Or that a certain belief leads to absurd conclusions?
JustinC
[This message has been edited by JustinCy, 09-14-2003]

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by crashfrog, posted 09-14-2003 10:57 PM JustinC has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 24 of 25 (55471)
09-14-2003 10:57 PM
Reply to: Message 23 by JustinC
09-14-2003 10:06 PM


Can I not point out that 4 doesn't equal 3 in a debate if the person has faith?
If you're in a debate about math, yes, point that out. But if we're talking about things that don't exist in the physical world, then 4 not equalling three may very well be a major component of their belief system.
Or that a certain belief leads to absurd conclusions?
You're welcome to try. But keep in mind that the person you're talking to may very well respond with "yes, it is absurd. But it's also true."
If you're not prepared to accept that as their position, then the debate is going to be fruitless for you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by JustinC, posted 09-14-2003 10:06 PM JustinC has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by JustinC, posted 09-15-2003 3:48 AM crashfrog has not replied

  
JustinC
Member (Idle past 4874 days)
Posts: 624
From: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Joined: 07-21-2003


Message 25 of 25 (55483)
09-15-2003 3:48 AM
Reply to: Message 24 by crashfrog
09-14-2003 10:57 PM


quote:
If you're in a debate about math, yes, point that out. But if we're talking about things that don't exist in the physical world, then 4 not equalling three may very well be a major component of their belief system.
Yeah, I don't care if they believe it. As long as they acknowledge its contradictory (I'm not saying Christianity is contradictory).
It would be like Pike showing Plantinga that freewill and omniscience are incompatible, and Plantinga saying, "Yeah, sure it is. But I still hold that they aren't" Ok...that's fine, whatever they want.
quote:
You're welcome to try. But keep in mind that the person you're talking to may very well respond with "yes, it is absurd. But it's also true."
I'd be willing to accept this.
JustinC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by crashfrog, posted 09-14-2003 10:57 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024