Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,924 Year: 4,181/9,624 Month: 1,052/974 Week: 11/368 Day: 11/11 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Suggest an answers forum
nwr
Member
Posts: 6412
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 1 of 4 (244985)
09-19-2005 5:15 PM


(Post copied here from Post 96 of the "Considerations...." topic by AdminBen)
I agree with GAW-Snow, except that I wonder if it should be a special forum. Or perhaps two forums, one for questions on science issues and the other for questions on faith/religion issues.
I'll describe how it would work for the answers on science:
Anybody could propose a question, or a small series of questions.
The discussion in the thread would be limited to the question(s) in the OP.
The originator of the thread, and others from the faith side, could post asking clarification. But they may not make any faith-based challenges of the answers given by those on the science side.
Those on the science side may answer the question(s). They may also ask (politely) for clarification of the questions. They may disagree with one another (part of the self-correction of science) provided that this disagreement is in the direction of answering the questions in the OP.
The originator of the thread will always be treated as if on the faith side (while within this thread). Even if a scientist proposes questions, he/she may only ask for clarification and may not challenge the answer given.
Topics should go through PNT, mainly to ensure the clarity of the questions raised.
Comments: So far Faith's Some mutations sound too good to be true has worked out well. Similarly Purgatory is an example of a question on faith issues that might have been handled this way.
The moderators gave Faith a hard time proposing her thread (for admittedly good reasons). I think it should not be that hard.
This message has been edited by AdminBen, Monday, 2005/09/19 02:17 PM

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by Ben!, posted 09-19-2005 5:20 PM nwr has replied

  
Ben!
Member (Idle past 1429 days)
Posts: 1161
From: Hayward, CA
Joined: 10-14-2004


Message 2 of 4 (244987)
09-19-2005 5:20 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by nwr
09-19-2005 5:15 PM


Channelling my inner Jar: A Direct Question
Why do you think putting questions into a special forum will solve the problems that we've had in the past?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by nwr, posted 09-19-2005 5:15 PM nwr has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by nwr, posted 09-19-2005 5:36 PM Ben! has not replied
 Message 4 by robinrohan, posted 09-19-2005 5:37 PM Ben! has not replied

  
nwr
Member
Posts: 6412
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 3 of 4 (244990)
09-19-2005 5:36 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by Ben!
09-19-2005 5:20 PM


Re: Channelling my inner Jar: A Direct Question
Using separate forum should make it a little easier to have (and announce) different acceptence criteria for PNTs, different moderation standards, and perhaps closer scrutiny.
I would expect that relatively few topics would be appropriate for the new forum.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by Ben!, posted 09-19-2005 5:20 PM Ben! has not replied

  
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 4 of 4 (244991)
09-19-2005 5:37 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by Ben!
09-19-2005 5:20 PM


Re: Channelling my inner Jar: A Direct Question
If somebody wanted a scientific question answered, rather than to present an argument, it might be handy. The only time I ever contribute to a sceintific topic is to ask questions, try to understand something, since my background is not scientific.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by Ben!, posted 09-19-2005 5:20 PM Ben! has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024