Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,910 Year: 4,167/9,624 Month: 1,038/974 Week: 365/286 Day: 8/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Scientists capture antimatter atoms
GDR
Member
Posts: 6202
From: Sidney, BC, Canada
Joined: 05-22-2005
Member Rating: 2.2


Message 1 of 6 (592144)
11-19-2010 1:00 AM


(CNN) -- Scientists have captured antimatter atoms for the first time, a breakthrough that could eventually help us to understand the nature and origins of the universe.
Researchers at CERN, the Geneva-based particle physics laboratory, have managed to confine single antihydrogen atoms in a magnetic trap.
This will allow them to conduct a more detailed study of antihydrogen, which will in turn allow scientists to compare matter and antimatter.
Understanding antimatter is one of the biggest challenges facing science -- most theoretical physicists and cosmologists believe that at the Big Bang, when the universe was created, matter and antimatter were produced in equal amounts.
However, as our world is made up of matter, antimatter seems to have disappeared.
Understanding antimatter could shed light on why almost everything in the known universe consists of matter.
Antimatter has been very difficult to handle because matter and antimatter don't get on, destroying each other instantly on contact in a violent flash of energy.
It's taken us five years to get here, this is a big milestone
--Professor Jeffrey Hangst In a precursor to today's experiment, in 2002 scientists at CERN produced antihydrogen atoms in large quantities, but they had an incredibly short lifespan -- just several milliseconds -- because the antihydrogen came into contact with the walls of their containers and the two annihilated each other.
In this latest experiment the lifespan of the antihydrogen atoms was extended by using magnetic fields to trap them and thus prevent them from coming into contact with matter.
The researchers created 38 antihydrogen atoms and held on to them for about a tenth of a second, which is long enough to study them says Professor Jeffrey Hangst, one of the team of CERN scientists who worked on the program.
Hangst and his colleagues produced a magnet field which was strongest near the walls of the trap, falling to a minimum at the center, causing the atoms to collect there in a vacuum.
"We could have held them for much longer... I am just full of joy and relief, it's taken us five years to get here, this is a big milestone," Hangst told CNN.
To trap just 38 atoms, they had to run the experiment 335 times, says Nature which published the report findings.
Hangst added: "This was ten thousand times more difficult than creating untrapped antihydrogen atoms.
"This will help us understand the structure of space and time. For reasons that no one yet understands, nature ruled out antimatter... this inspires us to work that much harder to see if antimatter holds some secret."
Malcolm Longair, professor of natural philosophy at Cambridge University, told CNN that CERN's results were a considerable achievement.
"At the Big Bang we believe the temperatures were very very high and we understand in theory why antimatter disappeared but there is no physical theory to back it up."
Antimatter was first predicted in 1931 by the British physicist Paul Dirac, who theorized that antimatter is ordinary matter in reverse.
CERN's next ambition is to create a beam of antimatter which they hope will allow them to unpeel more of the mysteries surrounding it.
The Link

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by Dogmafood, posted 11-19-2010 1:09 AM GDR has not replied
 Message 3 by Blue Jay, posted 11-19-2010 10:48 AM GDR has not replied

  
Dogmafood
Member (Idle past 378 days)
Posts: 1815
From: Ontario Canada
Joined: 08-04-2010


Message 2 of 6 (592145)
11-19-2010 1:09 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by GDR
11-19-2010 1:00 AM


Hmmm....elusive, hard to pin down. Disappears when confronted with real things. Sound familiar?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by GDR, posted 11-19-2010 1:00 AM GDR has not replied

  
Blue Jay
Member (Idle past 2727 days)
Posts: 2843
From: You couldn't pronounce it with your mouthparts
Joined: 02-04-2008


Message 3 of 6 (592247)
11-19-2010 10:48 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by GDR
11-19-2010 1:00 AM


I'm having a little trouble figuring out what this part means:
quote:
"At the Big Bang we believe the temperatures were very very high and we understand in theory why antimatter disappeared but there is no physical theory to back it up."
They understand, in theory, why it happened... but they don't have a theory for why it happened?
What am I missing?

-Bluejay (a.k.a. Mantis, Thylacosmilus)
Darwin loves you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by GDR, posted 11-19-2010 1:00 AM GDR has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by jar, posted 11-19-2010 11:12 AM Blue Jay has not replied
 Message 6 by Taz, posted 11-26-2010 1:54 PM Blue Jay has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 4 of 6 (592249)
11-19-2010 11:12 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by Blue Jay
11-19-2010 10:48 AM


I read it as there not yet being any experimental data to support the theories.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Blue Jay, posted 11-19-2010 10:48 AM Blue Jay has not replied

  
subbie
Member (Idle past 1284 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 5 of 6 (592943)
11-22-2010 10:23 PM


Bump for Buzsaw
Yo, Buzzy! In Message 254 you compared your god to antimatter, suggesting that since neither can be seen they are on equal footing from an evidentiary perspective. Please show us all the measures of god that are comparable to the measurements of anti-matter that are described in this article. Or, failing that (as we all know you will), please STFU.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Edited by subbie, : Tyop

Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist

  
Taz
Member (Idle past 3321 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 6 of 6 (593359)
11-26-2010 1:54 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by Blue Jay
11-19-2010 10:48 AM


Bluejay writes:
They understand, in theory, why it happened... but they don't have a theory for why it happened?
They understand, in common sense theory, why it happened, but they don't have a viable scientific theory for what it happened. Hope that helps.
Added by edit.
And bump for Buz.
Edited by Taz, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Blue Jay, posted 11-19-2010 10:48 AM Blue Jay has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024