Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,923 Year: 4,180/9,624 Month: 1,051/974 Week: 10/368 Day: 10/11 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Paleocurrents: the 'diverse' features of the GC were laid via rapid, correlated flow
TrueCreation
Inactive Member


Message 2 of 109 (11439)
06-12-2002 11:20 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Tranquility Base
06-12-2002 10:14 PM


http://www.evcforum.net/Images/Smilies/smile.gif[/IMG]I can easilly agree with Tranquillity that this is an area which quantifiably is explained with ease by Flood Hydrology. If mind serves me right, Tranquillity has the impression that mesozoic+sediments are post-flood or atleast indicate the process through which abating flood waters occured. I would disagree [unless I misunderstand him] and say that these would indicate flow paths by which the waters drifted above the continents. Here is one resource which I found with a bit data for paleocurrent lothologies:
http://geology.swau.edu/ [Added by edit - Just noticed Chadwick as the same author as your reference Tranquillity]
--Its a bit tougher to find paleocurrent than topographical maps [IMG]
------------------
<img src=http://www.promisoft.100megsdns.com/thumbnail.jpg><font size="1" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial">
[This message has been edited by TrueCreation, 06-12-2002]</FONT><font size="1" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial">
[This message has been edited by TrueCreation, 06-12-2002]</FONT>

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Tranquility Base, posted 06-12-2002 10:14 PM Tranquility Base has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by Tranquility Base, posted 06-12-2002 11:42 PM TrueCreation has not replied

  
TrueCreation
Inactive Member


Message 7 of 109 (11474)
06-13-2002 12:13 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by edge
06-13-2002 12:49 AM


"This is a nice assertion, but WHY? Why would the current directions for you flood be any different from the current directions from the existing flood of today (the existing seas)?"
--Are you expecting flood waters to lay perfectly still while they inundate the worlds continent(s)? There are many factors by which this would effect flood hydrology in prevailing currents sea-wide. I believe baumgardner and Barnette did some modeling of ocean circulation patterns over the continents as the Flood occurred. I haven't gotten the chance to read it though and I am not sure on their exact stances, nor did they take into account paleocurrents.
------------------
[This message has been edited by TrueCreation, 06-13-2002]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by edge, posted 06-13-2002 12:49 AM edge has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by gene90, posted 06-13-2002 6:32 PM TrueCreation has not replied

  
TrueCreation
Inactive Member


Message 12 of 109 (11526)
06-13-2002 8:55 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by Tranquility Base
06-13-2002 8:33 PM


"Gene90, so how did these hoodoos form from a mainstream POV? "
--Pretty much exactly the way they formed in our perspective, g-whiz who would have ever thought of that
------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by Tranquility Base, posted 06-13-2002 8:33 PM Tranquility Base has not replied

  
TrueCreation
Inactive Member


Message 23 of 109 (11548)
06-13-2002 11:45 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by gene90
06-13-2002 10:44 PM


"Hard rock capping a limestone (or similar) base. Add eons of rain.
Of course, lateral motion from a flood would topple it."
--Are we aware of any "paleohoodoo's"? I may have to come to accept a Cenozoic+ sediment post-flood deposition after all.
------------------
[This message has been edited by TrueCreation, 06-13-2002]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by gene90, posted 06-13-2002 10:44 PM gene90 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024