Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 0/368 Day: 0/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Leading creo organization advises creos shouldn't use certain arguments.
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 1 of 7 (150181)
10-15-2004 5:53 PM


First of all, I really don't know where this should go and this is why I posted it here in the proposed NT. This is more of an announcement than something to debate about.
Arguments creationists shouldn't use is a wonderful webpage for some creationists on here to read through before going at it. I stumbled upon that page and thought it could potentially weed out a lot of the obviously bogus creationist arguments that we often see popping up all over the forum.
Since creationists often refuse to take the advice of evos, I thought it would be better if they get this from their fellow creationists who are less insane.
I really strongly advice people reading this page. It advices people against using bogus arguments like the hydroplate theory (ahem *cough* Hangdawg13 *cough cough*), 2nd law (which we often see from newbies who often hit and run), Darwin recanted his theory (which we saw over and over during darkstar's reign of terror), and many other obviously rediculous arguments that should have been obviously rediculous in the first place.
I believe that if people take the time to read this that we will see more valid creationist arguments (if there are such things) on these boards.
Added by edit:
By the way, pay close attention to the Ron Watt section.
This message has been edited by Lam, 10-15-2004 04:59 PM

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by arachnophilia, posted 10-15-2004 6:39 PM coffee_addict has replied
 Message 6 by mike the wiz, posted 10-16-2004 4:29 PM coffee_addict has not replied

  
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 4 of 7 (150198)
10-15-2004 6:44 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by arachnophilia
10-15-2004 6:39 PM


Well, some of our least incoherent creationist occasionally try to use some of these arguments. So, I don't think that place is as well known as you think.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by arachnophilia, posted 10-15-2004 6:39 PM arachnophilia has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by Asgara, posted 10-15-2004 6:47 PM coffee_addict has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024