Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
0 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   A Case for a creator
CK
Member (Idle past 4157 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 5 of 46 (183965)
02-08-2005 2:11 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by JESUS freak
02-08-2005 1:45 PM


Hi Jesusfreak - could you tell us a little more about the content - what arguments does he explore?
If I remember right - this guy is a preacher, no?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by JESUS freak, posted 02-08-2005 1:45 PM JESUS freak has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by Asgara, posted 02-08-2005 4:32 PM CK has not replied

  
CK
Member (Idle past 4157 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 28 of 46 (184635)
02-11-2005 5:38 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by AdminJar
02-11-2005 5:30 PM


Re: I'm sorry we need to remend you but we've been over this before.
If you remember Jesusfreak's first ever thread was about lies in textbook - a claim that he was eventually (after about 150 posts of dodging the issue) he was forced to admit was totally false.
The same will happen here.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by AdminJar, posted 02-11-2005 5:30 PM AdminJar has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by coffee_addict, posted 02-13-2005 10:36 AM CK has not replied

  
CK
Member (Idle past 4157 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 34 of 46 (185590)
02-15-2005 3:04 PM
Reply to: Message 32 by JESUS freak
02-15-2005 2:27 PM


Re: Different thing
quote:
In the lies of the miller experiment, which I learned not to say yes to something too quickly, I thought (and to a point still do) believed that my textbook said that the miller experiment was proof of evoloution instead of abioginisis. No I am just saying that what ever it is trying to prove, they twisted the facts. Even my favorite magizine, popular science did this as well when talking about the miller experiment. My point is that you shouldn't say that creationists know nothing about science. In biblical terms, take out the log in your own eye before pointing at the spec in anothers.
I'm sorry but I just have to say this - you are full of shit.
You have NEVER produced ant evidence for your claims - I'll not speak for other creationists but YOU know nothing about science. That in itself is not the saddest thing, it is sad that you dishonour your religion and those who share it with you by telling some open falsehoods.
Do you think Jesus wants you to tell Lies for him? If Jesus appeared to you now, what do you think he would said to you?
Are you really wanting to try and pull this when any of us can check the old thread and read what you actually said.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by JESUS freak, posted 02-15-2005 2:27 PM JESUS freak has not replied

  
CK
Member (Idle past 4157 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 35 of 46 (185592)
02-15-2005 3:12 PM
Reply to: Message 32 by JESUS freak
02-15-2005 2:27 PM


Re: Different thing
From the old thread:
quote:
Message 8
quote: Yes I am, at least in EVERY non-Christian text book that talks about it. And the media (popoular science, Feb 2004)
quote:
Message 9
quote:I think that it is a part of evoloution, but whatever my opinion is about it, the miller-urly experiment is being used extensively to premote evoloution everywhere from my textbooks to National Geograpic.
quote:
Message 33
quote:Yes thank you, but my point still stands that whether or not the miller experiment has to do with evoloution, it is being used that way.
quote:
Message 42
quote:good I can be the first at something. I have not said evoloution is wrong in this forum. I have said that the miller experiment is being used as a basis of fact along with a bunch of other things that are not the topic of this forum to premote the theory of evolution. Not to mention the fact that the miller experiment was a failere.
quote:
Message 66
quote: Fine, let's say that the miller experiment has nothing to do with evoloution. This doesn't change the fact that it is being used as evidence in school courses. My point remains.
quote:
Message 67
quote:That was my point, it may not have anything to do with evoloution, but IT IS BEING USED AS PROOF OF evolution.
You are a liar, plain and simple.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by JESUS freak, posted 02-15-2005 2:27 PM JESUS freak has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 36 by Percy, posted 02-15-2005 3:42 PM CK has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024