Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The resilience of matter's fundamental components
SirL
Inactive Member


Message 4 of 46 (208310)
05-15-2005 7:31 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Tony650
05-14-2005 11:06 PM


Tony650 writes:
So, obviously, my initial reaction was wrong. This got me wondering, though, if such a thing is even possible. Not with atoms, but with the fundamental quanta of matter. That is, when dealing with a truly elementary particle with no smaller parts, would it be possible, even if only in principle, to "engrave" it, in any real sense?
Engraving is really just scraping off a few atoms. So it can't be done at any lower level. It is of very high concern in semi-conductor technology, where we are fast approaching this limit: around 30nm for CMOS (complementary metal-oxide semiconductors). That's with an insulating layer down to a single nanometer, which would have a number of atoms you could count on a leper's hand.
Below which, from an engineering standpoint, matter starts acting funny, and I think engraving would lose all meaning.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Tony650, posted 05-14-2005 11:06 PM Tony650 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by AdminJar, posted 05-15-2005 12:16 PM SirL has not replied
 Message 7 by Tony650, posted 05-16-2005 1:40 AM SirL has not replied

  
SirL
Inactive Member


Message 15 of 46 (210022)
05-20-2005 1:34 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by Tony650
05-20-2005 1:59 AM


Re: Bump?
Tony650 writes:
I'm thinking that, if quarks have a definite size, would it not simply be a matter of having enough in one place?
Elemental particles, including quarks, are considered point objects: that is, they have neither volume nor any internal structure as far as anyone can tell.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Tony650, posted 05-20-2005 1:59 AM Tony650 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by Tony650, posted 05-21-2005 10:12 AM SirL has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024