Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,911 Year: 4,168/9,624 Month: 1,039/974 Week: 366/286 Day: 9/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Genes and Personality
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 3 of 30 (221329)
07-02-2005 11:27 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by GDR
07-01-2005 11:44 PM


This seems very close in subject matter to a recent debate between Mr. Jack and holmes on evolutionary psychology.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by GDR, posted 07-01-2005 11:44 PM GDR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by GDR, posted 07-02-2005 1:18 PM Chiroptera has replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 5 of 30 (221352)
07-02-2005 1:50 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by GDR
07-02-2005 1:18 PM


I am not aware of any explicit links between specific genes and specific behaviours or personality traits. There may be some links between certain psychological disorders and specific genes, but I don't know. Most of the evidence in favor of the heredity of personality traits come from attempting to observe how personality traits run in families, twin studies, and cross cultural comparisons. There are also some studies that show that some physical characteristics of the brain correlate with certain behaviours, like homosexuality in men.
Some of the more pathetic "evidence" used to support the heredity of personality traits include trying to show how certain behaviours could have some sort of adaptive value. Like a long ago Newsweek article put it: it is clear that men have a biological preference for women in short skirts since women in long dresses would trip over the hem and squash their babies.
I tend to be very, very biased against putting too much emphasis on genetics as a source of personality and behaviour, perhaps unreasonably so. One reason is that Stephen Jay Gould, whose popular science essays I greatly admire, was very critical of it. The other reason is that by the time I read about studies supposedly supporting a biological basis for certain behaviours in the popular media, it tends to be used to justify certain exploitive aspects of American culture.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by GDR, posted 07-02-2005 1:18 PM GDR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by GDR, posted 07-02-2005 11:20 PM Chiroptera has not replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 12 of 30 (221675)
07-04-2005 12:53 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by gengar
07-04-2005 12:15 PM


Re: Memes
The problem with memes is that, although it is an interesting idea that may have some validity, there is no well-developed "Theory of Memes" that can be tested, and so no data that supports it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by gengar, posted 07-04-2005 12:15 PM gengar has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024