It looks as if the main thread
Upside-down Day is in a pause, either temporary or permanent.
What went wrong?
I think that a successful devil's advocate debate depends on their being a substantial core of facts on which both sides agree. There might also be disputed facts, but there needs to be a core of agreed facts as a basis for the debate. The debate then centers on differing interpretations of those facts, or different ways of drawing inferences from the agreed facts. This often is a matter of differences on the relative importance of the core facts.
In the evolution-creation dispute, there does not seem to be a sufficient core of agreed facts. This is actually a common problem with disagreements over which paradigm to use. A scientific theory, to some extent, dictates the kinds of facts to seek. For example, ToE tells us that genetic similarity is a basis for finding relations between organisms. The creationists want to relate organisms depending on whether they are the same kind, rather than the species/genus style of classification. But the term "kind" is ill defined.