Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   If evolution is our origin, where will we end up?
nwr
Member
Posts: 6412
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 30 of 33 (240338)
09-04-2005 2:22 AM
Reply to: Message 29 by Carson O'Genic
09-04-2005 1:53 AM


Re: Homo Sapiens first species with "progressive" evolution?
I guess the interesting arguement comes to whether this is good for the human race or not.
Yes, it is good. Eugenics, by contrast, is bad.
The effect of what we are doing is to increase the amount of genetic variation in the gene pool. This makes it more likely that the gene pool will contain genes that can withstand the next serious crisis, whatever that may be. If we were to get carried away with eugenics, that would reduce the amount of variation in the gene pool, and that would increase the risk that we could not survive the next crisis.
Evidently the way I am looking at this is different from the way you are looking at this.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by Carson O'Genic, posted 09-04-2005 1:53 AM Carson O'Genic has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by Carson O'Genic, posted 09-05-2005 2:40 PM nwr has replied

  
nwr
Member
Posts: 6412
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 33 of 33 (240616)
09-05-2005 3:14 PM
Reply to: Message 32 by Carson O'Genic
09-05-2005 2:40 PM


Re: Homo Sapiens first species with "progressive" evolution?
Carson O'Genic writes:
I disagree that medical eugenics are a bad thing. Before anyone jumps down my throat, I beleive any decission to prevent or terminate a pregnancy is up to the parents. I'm in no way for state inforced eugenics.
To put it in perspective, when I wrote "If we were to get carried away with eugenics,..." I was intending that to refer to state enforced eugenics. I don't think we really disagree. I don't have any problems with current practice, which includes genetic counselling.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by Carson O'Genic, posted 09-05-2005 2:40 PM Carson O'Genic has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024