Let's suppose that I have discovered a really neat link, and I want everyone to know about it.
Hopefully the link would have something to do with a topic, be it an old topic or a new proposed topic. Relevant links can and should still be posted in relevant topics. My proposal would be to additionally have a unified storage site.
Here's an alternative suggestion. Instead of one message per member, how about one thread per member.
I like keeping all in a single topic. A member could start his/her message in the topic, and add or subtract links as time goes by. The message subtitle should be "Joe Blow's Links". The
topic index would function just fine as the index. All the messages indexed on one page.
This is not intended to replace having links in debate topics. But as it is now, people post neat links in topics, and soon they're lost track of. I am proposing that if they think they have a special link, they should also post it in this topic. Then when you find yourself in the possition of "I know Bill Birkeland posted this link somewhere, but I don't know where", you have a chance of finding it by looking in the Bill Birkeland message of this topic.
I suggest keeping things bare boned. A url of a link (which would have the main domain right there in the display) and a 1 line description of the links material.
Having useful topics sink out of sight is always a problem. Hopefully there would be enough people posting new messages to keep this topic at least close to top of the "L&I" index. In addition, it would be a good topic to have bookmarked, and perhaps in the various admin "signatures". You could also bookmark your personal message in the topic, for easy access.
Perhaps an individual member should be limited to, say, 10 or 20 links in his/her message. Thus we might have a "Bill Birkeland's Top 20 links" message.
I'll tack on a reply to Jar also:
Jar writes:
how does everyone get to edit the Bill topic?
You mean "message" not "topic". You wouldn't edit Bill's message, but you could add the link to your own message. A "via Bill Birkeland" credit might be a nice touch, but I would like to keep the verbage to a minimum.
Adminnemooseus