Quality Control the Gold Standard

You called him a hack and a fraud. The record stands and your lack of credibility is fully accounted for.I would never ask for an apology to me from anyone on this forum and if given would not be accepted.

Was there some actual information in your post? I thought gibberish was forbidden here.I'm not your son, friend, acquaintance or anything else so stow your condecension.

I was hoping for consistency; but alas in prior posts you and others demand references ( why would you ask for them unless you wanted to read them) and now references are ver botin as unwanted reading assignments. Its really rather humorous.

Of course it is !! LOL!! I see a few people picked up on your hypocrisy and you're sqirming.

I just remembered looking through Origin of the Species and not seeing anything more mathmatical that measuring finch beaks.Did I miss the calculus,diff eq , complex variable, vetor and tensor analysis and approximate methods... what page are those on.

Here are a few of the many peer reviewed research papers published by the FRAUD.Just a moment...Just a moment...Just a moment...Just a moment...Just a moment...Just a moment...Just a moment...Just a moment...Just a moment...

Math is used in various absrruce forms (see Pregorine) to prop up a subjective set of tenents.Evolution works in reverse of truly great science in that an objective and mathmatical formulation is used to capture tand demonstrate the theory and then experimentation and empirical observation follows.Or do you actually believe Newton sat under the apple tree and Galileo climbed the Tower first.

ONce he became a creationist formally by employment he was blackballed from any evolutionary publication as is everyone else.Are you saying he was once a talented, well educated, productive and useful scientist but upon becoming a creationist he bacame a useless, moron.Life has phases each of which has its validity.

So the theory of relativity was originally:I was watching some energy and mass interchange in my back yard and the idea that sunlight made it possible for me to see led me to E=mc**2Later that week I felt the sudden impusle of gravity waves and the pelting of gravitons and the time seemed to shrink while my ruler was alternately lenghthening and shrinking before my very eyes.I was totally bent and warped out of shape by the observations and immediately started to think how I could possibly express these observations in mathmatical terms.

The curvature of light by gravitation/mass was not shown or even possible to observe in an experimental setting until years after he published the prediction when the perihelian og Mercuty could be observed and analyzed in detail.Nice try but no banana.

Which includes the defeated pseudo-scientists (alias for evolutionists) he debated for thirty years prior to his retirement.Einstein spent less than 5%of his worklife in a lab and Hawkings even less yet they are considered 1st class scientists... theoretical physicists.Gish read prodigiously, maintained his scientific societal memberships and wrote a number of books on his views all with impeccible footnotes and references.The CRSQ web site is easily searched for peer reviewed Creationist rResearch papers and projects and that is up to you.

I thought profanity was a no-no at this forum... I guess that only applies to the intelleigent, rational and logical posts.. that leaves you out.Gish made a conscious decision based on convictions to use his gifts in a second career. That hardly obviates his previous contributions, intellect, prowess or work product.What of significance did Einstein puiblish in any peer reviewed journal after 1940... little if anything of consequence. Did that make him a fraud,liar,miscreant and useless pseudo scientist?You logic is laughable.

First of all you are a liar and ill informed concerning the footprint deal which was recanted twenty years ago publically by the entire ICR staff.Second the moom dust article is old hat and not in any new material that I am aware of.Third the precambrian includes the 600 million years of no fossil evidence preceeding the complex invertebrates. If you think mud trails without a single organic molecule constitute fossil evidence for precambrian life leading up to say a mollusk, a sponge or a trilobyte have at it.Not one of these so called supposed fossils has any ancestral relationship to the complex invertebrates. They are isolated and apart from the cambrian fossils having no possible evolutionary connection.Desperation is the last bastion of ignorance.

Your assertions and ad hominems mean nothing to someone who hs been studying this subject since 1974. Of couse you could provide some evidentiary staements and then you could elevate your credibility above pure sophistry.