Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,911 Year: 4,168/9,624 Month: 1,039/974 Week: 366/286 Day: 9/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Big Rip theory
Modulous
Member
Posts: 7801
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


Message 7 of 40 (291207)
03-01-2006 12:44 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by kallcium
03-01-2006 12:31 PM


, in my opinion it couldn't be the big bang because according to those laws the acceleration would stop and it would continue at a constant speed or constant acceleration unless acted apon by an outside force
It sounds like you might think that the big bang was some kind of conventional (albeit cosmologically huge) explosion that obeys the laws of explosions. However, it is not an explosion but the inflation of space as time increases. Your thoughts about an outside force acting upon it is taken care of by dark energy.
Whether or not the big rip is our universe's fate depends on what the ratio between the dark energy pressure and its density. Its not quite so intuitive and straight forward unfortunately.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by kallcium, posted 03-01-2006 12:31 PM kallcium has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by kallcium, posted 03-01-2006 12:48 PM Modulous has replied

  
Modulous
Member
Posts: 7801
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


Message 13 of 40 (291213)
03-01-2006 12:55 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by kallcium
03-01-2006 12:48 PM


How does anyone know that the big bang is the way you described?
The geometry of space/time is described very accurately by relativity.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by kallcium, posted 03-01-2006 12:48 PM kallcium has not replied

  
Modulous
Member
Posts: 7801
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


Message 28 of 40 (291274)
03-01-2006 3:31 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by kallcium
03-01-2006 1:39 PM


Einstein
I think anybody that wants to understand the Big Bang should read cavediver's posts on the subject. One such post can be found here, which I will quote for your pleasure:
cavediver writes:
Now, if we put in an infinte uniform mass distribution (like dust scattered through empty space) we get a different solution. The idea is that this distribution mimics the universe on the largest scale. This solution describes space-time as a finite hyper-sphere that starts with zero size (and hence infinite density), expands to maximum, and then contracts back to zero size.
Shortly after General Relativity made this prediction, Hubble came along and formulated the Redshift Distance Law of galaxies which is consistent with the predictions of General Relativity. That is, General Relativity predicted the nature of the universes expansion (and its hotter and denser past), and Hubble discovered that the expansion part of it was right.
Later, the cosmic background radiation was measured, this time confirming the prediction that the universe was much hotter and denser in the past, viz. The Big Bang.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by kallcium, posted 03-01-2006 1:39 PM kallcium has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 29 by Chiroptera, posted 03-01-2006 5:22 PM Modulous has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024