quote:
Most first-world countries would recognize technology for what it is.
Most first-world countries would recognize technology for what it is as long as that technology were close enough to our own that we could get some grasp upon it. But that is the rub. Suppose it were outside that conceptual framework. Consider: Imagine a technology which in no way resembles our technology and which violates much of what we think we know about the way the word works. I don't think we can imagine such a thing, thus claiming that we'd identify it as technology is a bit odd. In fact, when I try to imagine such technology what I come up with is something quite god-like.
quote:
Not everyone, especially scientists, would accept it as "magic" or "divinity"; especially coming from an alien origin.
No. There would be dissent, but people as a whole would likely latch onto magic and divinity. Look at some of the UFO cults that have been floating around for some time now. Here we have groups of people constructing just this sort of SAI/god based religion and without any real evidence for the technology at all. Imagine what would happen if such evidence were to emerge.
quote:
This is, of course, assuming that there is technology out there in the universe that is superior to our own.
Well, yes. It is speculation, after all. And there is no good evidence for ET technology, though given the size of the universe I'd place my bet for life on other planets. Some of them ought to have better stuff than do we.
------------------
No webpage found at provided URL: www.hells-handmaiden.com