Is that a reasonable request?
i suppose.
however:
It is still referring to a very specific portion.
I am here to clear up this errant thinking that Genesis 1 and 2 are contradictory as far as man being created after the beasts in Genesis 1, and then being "created" again, before the beasts, in Genesis 2.
yes, and that portion i specifically addressed in one of my "off topic" posts, refering to the previous thread where i established that the causal relationships dictated order.
Since he's new to EvC, I'd like him to have a chance to discuss his position and not have his thread turned into a rehash of the old thread.
You, jar, Faith, Randman, and ramoss have hashed this out several times. Give TC time to come back and participate in his thread.
may i suggest you modify the warning to temporarily put a halt on the thread until teets can come back and address, specifically, my post in reply to his op, or others that ask the similar question: "what does a created, but formless man look like?"
but I do ask that veteran members not run off with the thread beyond the scope of the OP.
in my opinion, the scope is a little TOO limited. we can't discuss other renderings (i've never seen kjv-onlyism enforced by moderators), i can't discuss the hebrew and the connotations therein, and we can't provide additional evidence that the stories are in fact different.
™ Version 4.2