Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
0 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Pope Tells Hawking Not to Study Origins of Universe
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1496 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 9 of 16 (321990)
06-15-2006 5:38 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by NosyNed
06-15-2006 1:54 PM


Re: Fair play?
I suspect Hawking was only thinking of it as an amusing anecdote but it seems to me to be unfair to bring it up when the Pope isn't around to defend himself and to clarify.
This isn't the first time, by decades, that Hawking has told this story, so ol' J-Peez Jizones had plenty of time to defend himself if he didn't actually say that.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by NosyNed, posted 06-15-2006 1:54 PM NosyNed has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1496 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 10 of 16 (321992)
06-15-2006 5:42 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by rgb
06-15-2006 2:10 PM


Some elements of the Bush Administration have been known to withdraw fundings from science research groups whose conclusions contradict the Administration's claims in environmental issues. A recent one is when fundings were withdrawed from a group that have found that salvage logging hinders a burnt forest's recovery.
It doesn't really make any sense to offer the actions of the Bush Administration as an example of suppression that isn't involved with religion.
Harvard president got canned after remarking that perhaps the reason so fewer females are in the fields of science than males is because of the differences in brain physiology... or something like that.
Not exactly.
Firstly? Not canned. He resigned by his own choice, against the wishes of a considerably supportive administration, I might add.
Secondly? That happened months after his remarks. Months, during which he embroiled himself in a lot more serious kerfluffles, none of which had anything to do with his remarks at the lunch.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by rgb, posted 06-15-2006 2:10 PM rgb has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024