quote:
The fact is that Bush is violating US law if he launches this war (it is against the constitution). He has plenty of precedent with other presidents doing the same thing, but even his daddy asked for power first with such a major operation (against Iraq nonetheless).
Liberalism has nullified any meaning the constitution holds. Why bother brining it up?
quote:
Unfortunately the evidence, while not necessarily discounting the presence of WMD's, clearly shows Iraq is not in a position or posture to attack the US. This removes any idea that this is a "pre-emptive strike".
Only those privy to the security information can make a statement like that. Iraq's deployment of WMD is not clearly known to us because the DoD doesn't want us to know. It's that simple.
quote:
If it needs any more weight, we have already called the UN into question in an "our way or the highway" mentality, Bush is willing to fracture NATO and the EU in order to get his way.
If the US is economically desolate, do you think the UN gives a flying crap? The UN will not lose anything if half the US is wiped out by biological warfare. A mock shoulder shrug at our dismay and the UN keeps on trucking. So why should the US but their faith in them?
quote:
And for anyone with foresight, it would set precedent for China to attack Taiwan and Tibet, India to attack Pakistan (or vice versa), and Isreal to overrun Palestine.
China has already stated it will take back Taiwan at all costs. That is inevitable. I could be wrong, but hasn't China already attacked Tibet? India and Pakistan will fight no matter what. None of these are good examples.
quote:
If they engage in such criminal and wreckless behavior it may come down to people having to pull them out of power. There are mechanisms for this in the US. The fact that we used them for a guy lying about a blowjob, should give us some courage.
Nice. Real nice. I like how you completely dismiss lying under oath because it was about getting head.
™ Version 4.2