PaulK
Member Posts: 17828 Joined: 01-10-2003 Member Rating: 2.3
|
|
Message 7 of 12 (34604)
03-18-2003 2:35 AM
|
Reply to: Message 6 by DanskerMan 03-18-2003 12:28 AM
|
|
The point of this thread is that you are quite wrong. Evolution has got a lot in common with the tinkering that produces unnecessary complexity while creationism postulates a design-from-scratch scenario that should keep complexity down. The more complex life is the more likely it evolved, rather than being designed.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 6 by DanskerMan, posted 03-18-2003 12:28 AM | | DanskerMan has replied |
|
PaulK
Member Posts: 17828 Joined: 01-10-2003 Member Rating: 2.3
|
|
Message 9 of 12 (34659)
03-19-2003 2:39 AM
|
Reply to: Message 8 by DanskerMan 03-19-2003 12:44 AM
|
|
Well there is one big problem in your argument, It assumes that evolution doesn't happen. However evolution does happen and - as we have been pointing out it fits the observed data much better than "design-from-scratch". And evolutionary principles have been used to produce designs, so design is certainly possible without intelligent intervention.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 8 by DanskerMan, posted 03-19-2003 12:44 AM | | DanskerMan has not replied |
|