Salty, I have to say that I find the continual lack of substance in your replies to be both quite illuminating and irritating, especially when they are in response to questions which you never answer.
Now, I am aware that this was not directed at me but since you find the pseudonyms so troubling, my name is XXXXXXXXXXX and my latest degree is a doctorate in Biochemistry and Cell Biology. You can do a search for the papers that I have published, although you will see a very limited number of the last 8 years as I moved to industry and most of my publications here have been in more technical documentation for the FDA or as patents, many of which have not yet issued. I was not putting my name on these posts earlier because my wife is a member of a church which has a few (happily very few) fundies and I did not want them to be giving her grief over me. However, I have decided that open info is better, not to mention that they know me well enough to leave her the hell alone.
Now, as to how I feel about Behe, I like some of his DNA work but his IC theories are in error, both from a theoretical point and from the data as well. But I have addressed that elsewhere on this board. Dembski I have little respect for as he uses mathematical procedures that are grossely irrelevant to the question at hand, at least according to some of the mathematical/biological reviews of his ID work that I have read.
Feel better now.
------------------
"Chance favors the prepared mind." L. Pasteur
Taz
Edited to keep TOO many crazies from getting my full name
[This message has been edited by Dr_Tazimus_maximus, 03-27-2003]