Salty Discussion Post-mortem

Go for it M or Scott or whoever. UVM has denied that I exist. Try to find any reference to me. It is right out of George Orwell's 1984. You are no better than they are, totally intolerant of anything that disagrees with your view of the world. The only difference between me and Mike Behe is that Lehigh tolerates dissent. UVM, like this forum does not. Make your inquiries and do what you will with them. I'll stick with a student of mine who said "He made me want to learn". Most members of this forum don't have to learn as they already have all the answers. Keep up the insults too. They add fuel to my antiDarwinian fire and provide proof of your persistent adherence to a fairy tale. Who was that said "Animal are not struggling for existence - most of the time they are sitting around doing nothing at all". It reminds me of some of the members of this forum. salty

Scott, if you don't care then why are you going to ask around a bit? That is pure hypocricy. Now when you come back don't forget to dutifully report you findings like a good soldier. When you can't attack the message (and not a single solitary soul has) go after the messenger. Have a nice day! salty

M There is no reason in the world for me to debate my points with you or anyone else. You say Dawkins supports some of his transparent foolishness. So have I. It is called publication. I have made it very easy for you or anyone else to see EXACTLY what my position is. If you refuse to read it, that is your defect not mine. Why do you insist on a double standard for me and Richard Dawkins. He has published his view of the world just as I have published mine. You just seem to prefer his version, based as it is on pure blind chance. The simple unvarnished truth is that you don't like my conclusions. I am not terribly happy about some of them myself. Publishing a paper is like having a baby. I will protect my baby to my death and neither you or anyone else will ever change that. Keep up the insults, I love it so! salty

Scott it was never my original intention to "inflame Darwinists" but it sure has been the result. Every time I open my little mouth I get a barrage of insults from adherents to the "One True Faith" like yourself. I don't see how with your teaching load you have time for all this rhetoric. Why don't you invite your students in to share with them your view of the world? Or better yet invite your chairperson. I'll bet she would just love it. Mine never even bothered to read my papers. She didn't have to - as she apparently knew by instinct.
salty

Percy, I haven't had any success at any boards. THe only success I have had was to convince Terry to add OR BOTH? at his Forum. That wasn't easy but that is the only success I can enjoy except to have Engle include me in the dedication to "Far From Equilibrium". I guess I am a pretty pathetic creature don't you think? After all, the truth has always been determined by the majority hasn't it? Of course it has. salty

Mr. P You are a credit to the spirit of this forum. salty

Neither one. It is the Darwinians who have arrived at a theory. Why I will never understand. salty

How can I respond to my critics when I have none. The only published mention of my evolutionary work is that of Phillip Engle, who included me in his dedication along with Albert Einstein and Henri Poincare. I will be happy to respond to any criticism of my work by any one who has the guts to go after me in a refereed journal. The simple fact is that they are afraid to go after me for the same reason they have failed to react to the far more devastating attacks by Pierre Grasse, Leo Berg, Richard Goldschmidt, and the father of modern genetics William Bateson. It is only on forums like this whose vicious attacks are the standard that you will find a response to the critics of the Darwinian myth. Fortunately, the venom that is the usual fare in places like this will never see the light of hard copy. If it might, you can be sure the tone would be somewhat different. Go on hiding behind your cloaks of anonymity. It is the only armor that you have. I at least have had the guts to lay it on the line. Why don't the Darwimps have the guts to expose me? I'll tell you why. It is summarized in one word. FEAR, fear of the truth that they have been chasing a phantom called chance for over 160 years. I'll bet most of you haven't even bothered to read Grasse or Berg or Broom or any other critics of the Darwinian fable. You will never understand where I am coming from until you do. I have better things to do than to continue to try to communicate with a bunch of intolerant ideologues. Since no one has been able to expose a single error in the representation of facts in my papers I see no point in giving you any more time. Fare thee well. Find another nonbeliever to attack. salty