Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Genetics and Human Brain Evolution
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 110 of 157 (360917)
11-02-2006 6:40 PM
Reply to: Message 103 by eggasai
11-02-2006 6:43 AM


Re: Theater of the mind
The debates over dude, I'm just hanging around long enough to tell you guys exactly why.
I don't why you were expecting honesty from a group that has no moral fiber to begin with and no real concept of morality apart from some relativistic, abstract concept. It may be difficult, I know, but try and hear the evo's out. Not all of them are stark raving lunatics. And if anything, take as a way to hone your debate skills and to stay sharp with the latest arguments, pro and con.
I went through something simular with Liberal theology and finally realized it was just eccumentical atheism.
Heh. We have quite a few of those here on EvC who profess to be Christian but really have nothing good to say about Christ. And virtually all of their beliefs mirror atheism which makes me wonder how exactly they consider themselves Christians.
Now in the life sciences you have Darwinian duplicity, the fact is I can't trust anything you guys say. When you are wrong and I know your wrong you won't admit it, why would I ask you about something I am trying to learn? Your just going to tell me wrong.
Again, you're shocked?
Sorry buddy, I have suddenly lost all interest. I'm going to put together a blog and maybe start a website where Christians can learn about he historicity of Scripture without having their faith ridiculed.
Drop me an invite. My wife is working on a similar site.

"The weapons of our warfare are not carnal but mighty in God for pulling down strongholds, casting down arguments and every high thing that exalts itself against the knowledge of God." -2nd Corinthians 10:4-5

This message is a reply to:
 Message 103 by eggasai, posted 11-02-2006 6:43 AM eggasai has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 111 by Wounded King, posted 11-02-2006 6:55 PM Hyroglyphx has replied
 Message 112 by CACTUSJACKmankin, posted 11-02-2006 7:11 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied
 Message 114 by eggasai, posted 11-02-2006 7:25 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied
 Message 126 by crashfrog, posted 11-03-2006 11:12 AM Hyroglyphx has replied
 Message 137 by RAZD, posted 11-04-2006 9:24 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 125 of 157 (361080)
11-03-2006 9:53 AM
Reply to: Message 111 by Wounded King
11-02-2006 6:55 PM


Re: Theater of the absurd
Is this on topic?
I don't know. I haven't been following this thread. The Eggasai post I respnded to caught my eye, so I thought I respond.
Do you have anything to add? If you want to contribute here why don't you try and help your rut stuck co-religionist to understand either the very basic fundamentals of molecular genetics which they seem incapable of grasping, I assure you it probably wouldn't take you more than 5 minutes of reading to see that Eggasai's conception is majorly messed up, or even the fundamentals of reading a formula which also seems to be causing them a lot of trouble.
I haven't been engaged on this thread, but now my attention has been piqued. I'll take a look at a few post to get an understanding of the argument.
Don't come here bemoaning hom immoral/amoral and dishonest we all are and commisserating with an ignorant, arrogant, virtual troll who can't be bothered to poke their head out of the shell of bullshit they have surrounded themselves with for long enough to see that in fact they don't know shit from shinola.
The jab has less to do with immorality than it did with an amoral outlook. I was merely pointing out that the irreligious have no reason to stay honest when there are no repercussions other than one's pride.
Do you have any idea who has the right side scientifically in this argument?
No, admittedly I don't. But like I said, now my attention is piqued. I simply saw that one post and thought it humorous. I know that some evo's can become rather cantankerous in trying to prove their position, but on this occasion I only read that one post.
If you agree with Eggasai why not provide some evidence if not then why are you accusing the rest of us of dishonesty?
I've quite a few of my own posts on other threads that need my attention, but I will try to engage in the convo.

"The weapons of our warfare are not carnal but mighty in God for pulling down strongholds, casting down arguments and every high thing that exalts itself against the knowledge of God." -2nd Corinthians 10:4-5

This message is a reply to:
 Message 111 by Wounded King, posted 11-02-2006 6:55 PM Wounded King has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 127 by crashfrog, posted 11-03-2006 11:14 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied
 Message 130 by Dr Adequate, posted 11-03-2006 1:05 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 133 of 157 (361139)
11-03-2006 1:47 PM
Reply to: Message 126 by crashfrog
11-03-2006 11:12 AM


Re: If you were wondering what it looks like when Crash actually gets mad...
You know what? Cram it up your ass... you're an idiot
How ever have I come to my conclusions????
You don't know any of us, NJ. You know absolutely nothing about us, and for you to level an accusation of immorality is a base slander, deeply offensive in every way.
I know what you tell me. I know that you have no real regard for morality, you've said so yourself. You put yourself in an indefensible position by asserting moral relativism, but give no satisfying reasons for the assumption. Aside from which, I did't say you or anyone here was immoral. I even clarified for WK, and said, amoral. If morals are merely relative and subject to your whims and your discretion, then it doesn't really exist. If they don't actually exist, then what are you mad? Get it, now? Am I so far off-base? If you're offended then you must be accepting that on some level their is some truth to it. Lying has its advantages in the natural world, does it not? So, if there is nothing keeping you accountable, then why should I assume that you or anyone from your ilk would view truth in a respectful manner? Maybe you can explain that to me.
And the fact that you'll be allowed to perpetuate these disguisting ad hominem while the rest of us will accept suspension or worse for defending ourselves will be all but ignored by you and Buzzsaw and Faith and all the rest of the ridiculous cut-and-run creationists who throw a huge pity party at the slightest suggestion that they be held to some kind of standard of civil conduct.
Crash, do you see anyone else throwing a tantrum besides yourself? I was talking to Eggasai, and last time I checked, I was protected by the First Amendment to do that. You are certainly welcome to argue your points, but don't say someone else used ad hom, (which is a "personal" attack), when I have not mentioned one persons name. You kind of undermine your whole argument by throwing for yourself quite the elaborate pity party and call me, specifically, names.
So, please, calm down, do some breathing techniques, take some Zoloft... I get it. You don't like me. But just think, I provide for you meaningful entertainment. Surely there is something worthy in that, aye....
I thought you had some potential to turn out to be a decent human being.
What does that mean to a primate like me? What is "worthy" mean to an ape? Some more of your sort-of-kinda morals?
Turns out you're as arrogant and presumptuous as the rest of the know-nothing nutballs.
Gotta be something in this world.

"The weapons of our warfare are not carnal but mighty in God for pulling down strongholds, casting down arguments and every high thing that exalts itself against the knowledge of God." -2nd Corinthians 10:4-5

This message is a reply to:
 Message 126 by crashfrog, posted 11-03-2006 11:12 AM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 134 by crashfrog, posted 11-03-2006 2:09 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024