Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 13/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The rights of a woman.
AdminSchraf
Inactive Member


Message 4 of 21 (365506)
11-22-2006 8:01 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by riVeRraT
11-22-2006 1:53 PM


quote:
Having an abortion is not dealing with it. It is a way out of something that you started, but do not want to finish.
This is the essence of the argument, rat, and if you want to define "dealing with it" in only the way you think it should mean, then it seems rather clear that you aren't interested in listening to anyone else.
I don't think such a debate would be enlightening to anyone.
Edited by AdminSchraf, : fixed spelling

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by riVeRraT, posted 11-22-2006 1:53 PM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by riVeRraT, posted 11-25-2006 10:28 PM AdminSchraf has replied

AdminSchraf
Inactive Member


Message 8 of 21 (366035)
11-26-2006 8:55 AM
Reply to: Message 5 by riVeRraT
11-25-2006 10:28 PM


Your post is filled with unsupported claims that you are treating as if they are self-evident truths.
quote:
People have rights to privacy, rights to protection, and many other rights, that make perfect sense to me. I don't see how being allowed to create life, and abort it is a right. I see it as a quick fix for a bad decision. (not even a mistake).
Is the bolded portion the issue you would like to discuss?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by riVeRraT, posted 11-25-2006 10:28 PM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by riVeRraT, posted 11-27-2006 8:07 AM AdminSchraf has not replied

AdminSchraf
Inactive Member


Message 13 of 21 (366277)
11-27-2006 12:04 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by AdminPD
11-27-2006 8:41 AM


Re: Revise OP
quote:
Does a healthy woman have the right to knowingly engage in sexual intercourse, which has the sole purpose of reproduction, but terminate the reproductive process (healthy pregnancy) once it has begun? If yes, what gives her this right?
If the goal with this topic is to begin with a premise that all/most can live with, I suggest making another change.
"...which has the sole purpose of reproduction" is not a facually accurate statement, although many people hold it as a religious tenet.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by AdminPD, posted 11-27-2006 8:41 AM AdminPD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by AdminPD, posted 11-27-2006 12:36 PM AdminSchraf has replied

AdminSchraf
Inactive Member


Message 17 of 21 (366349)
11-27-2006 3:38 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by AdminPD
11-27-2006 12:36 PM


Re: Revise OP
quote:
Participants can make their case in the discussion if they disagree with the statement.
Well, that's why I am asking if it is important that the OP be a statement that everybody is likely to be able to live with.
I'm not sure yet another abortion thread that does not progress beyond disagreement over initial premises is useful.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by AdminPD, posted 11-27-2006 12:36 PM AdminPD has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024