What is your best arguments against a world wide flood.

But it isn't a few thousand years old. It's been known since 1820 or so that it's a thousand or more times that old, and ALL scientific evidence confirms that - about 4,560,000,000 years old since it accreted from protoplanetary objects, to be more precise. And no matter what the dates say, there are no worldwide deposits all dating to any one event anywhere in the geologic record. A "great flood" in the last 5000, or 500,000, years would have left some trace. It's not there.

Why do all the other rapidly spinning planets precess like that? Were they struck forcefully by a flood, too? Why does a spinning top that has not been struck by anything precess like that? You need to read some elementary physics, booboo.

Note also that rebound has been measured at rates as high as 11 mm per year in this area - that's 11 meters each millenium, and that's in the present, now that the rate has slowed greatly since the initial icemelt.
Ref: Space-Geodetic Constraints on Glacial Isostatic Adjustment in Fennoscandia G. A. Milne et al., Science 2001 March 23; 291: 2381-2385.

Find out for us what kind they are - you brought up the topic. I think that you will find that the reason it matters is that the suite of shells up there has not existed as living organisms for 20,000,000 years - that's how long that rock has been high and dry.
http://www.whoi.edu/pclift/eostxt.html[This message has been edited by Coragyps, 04-23-2003]

The official gazetteer for the US returns no hits for "sanhorn."
U.S. Board on Geographic Names | U.S. Geological SurveyTry again?Timor is an island between Indonesia and Australia.[This message has been edited by Coragyps, 04-23-2003]

booboo, where is this mountain you brought to the party?