Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,912 Year: 4,169/9,624 Month: 1,040/974 Week: 367/286 Day: 10/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   For Salty
Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 80 of 129 (40233)
05-15-2003 10:49 AM
Reply to: Message 78 by Mammuthus
05-15-2003 10:43 AM


Re: Calico cats
quote:
Wasnt cat people a movie about a group of people who could transform into black panthers?
There was a soft-pornish remake in the 80s as well, and it was the name of a David Bowie song.
And THAT is how you derail a thread!
------------------
-----------
Dan Carroll

This message is a reply to:
 Message 78 by Mammuthus, posted 05-15-2003 10:43 AM Mammuthus has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 82 by Mammuthus, posted 05-15-2003 11:07 AM Dan Carroll has replied

  
Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 83 of 129 (40241)
05-15-2003 11:16 AM
Reply to: Message 82 by Mammuthus
05-15-2003 11:07 AM


Re: Calico cats
quote:
Is the panther in the picture semi-meoitic?
No... if you see the 80s version, the cat people are all about sexual reproduction...
------------------
-----------
Dan Carroll

This message is a reply to:
 Message 82 by Mammuthus, posted 05-15-2003 11:07 AM Mammuthus has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 85 by Mammuthus, posted 05-15-2003 11:26 AM Dan Carroll has not replied

  
Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 93 of 129 (40255)
05-15-2003 12:15 PM


The first section will summarize the evidence that Darwinian mechanisms have not produced new life forms and so must be abandoned. Since the devices involved in Darwinism are sexual in nature, it follows that sexual reproduction cannot produce new kinds of living things.
This is part of the opening of Salty's paper on Evolution as a Self-Limiting Process.
Even if we assume he is right that Darwin's theories are incorrect, this a logical fallacy. Denying the antecedent. "If Darwin is right, sexual reproduction will be able to produce new kinds of living things. Darwin is not right, therefore sexual reproduction cannot produce new kinds of living things."
It's akin to saying, "When the weather is rainy, it's cold out. But it's not rainy today, therefore the weather will be warm." The weather could still be cold, but not rainy.
This fallacy seems to be the only explanation in the paper for sexual reproduction not being involved in evolution.
(Salty, if I'm misinterpreting what you said here, please let me know. Additionally, I haven't had time to read your other papers yet. You might explain it there.)
------------------
-----------
Dan Carroll

Replies to this message:
 Message 96 by John A. Davison, posted 05-15-2003 1:37 PM Dan Carroll has replied

  
Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 97 of 129 (40265)
05-15-2003 1:43 PM
Reply to: Message 96 by John A. Davison
05-15-2003 1:37 PM


Re: accuracy
Yikes. You complained that no one was reading your papers. I read it, pointed out a rather important logical fallacy, and respectfully asked you to clear it up if I was misinterpreting it.
You wanna call that "a den of hate" or "anal nonsense", that's your business...
------------------
-----------
Dan Carroll

This message is a reply to:
 Message 96 by John A. Davison, posted 05-15-2003 1:37 PM John A. Davison has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 100 by Mammuthus, posted 05-15-2003 3:09 PM Dan Carroll has replied
 Message 116 by Dr_Tazimus_maximus, posted 05-16-2003 2:50 PM Dan Carroll has not replied

  
Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 102 of 129 (40279)
05-15-2003 3:40 PM
Reply to: Message 100 by Mammuthus
05-15-2003 3:09 PM


Re: accuracy
I wonder if anyone in Menudo is dead... that's the kind of thing you don't hear about until well after you'd care, and then think it's an urban legend.
------------------
-----------
Dan Carroll

This message is a reply to:
 Message 100 by Mammuthus, posted 05-15-2003 3:09 PM Mammuthus has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 103 by Mammuthus, posted 05-15-2003 4:46 PM Dan Carroll has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024