Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What Happens When You Remove Faith
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 5 of 180 (402877)
05-30-2007 2:18 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Jazzns
05-29-2007 12:16 PM


I find these types of statements very strange because even as I question my own belief in God I would NEVER think that my own morality hinged upon my choice to believe or not.
Penalties do help keep me in line, althought they aren't a very good reason for good behavior.
One of the reasons that my morality hinges on my belief in god is that without god, I see humans as 'just another animal'. One of the reasons that I desire to be good to people is that I think they are special, because of god. I don't really care about the other animals that much.
Without god, and any real meaning to our existence, none of this shit really matters. Selfishness isn't 'wrong', it just isn't good for everyone. But that doesn't matter either OTOH, selfishness is good for me, so there is a benefit to it.
If we're all godless animals without any real meaning to our existence, then fuck all y'all, gimme mine. None of this shit matters anymore. But then, maybe I'm just a bad person. You should be glad that I believe in god. It makes me a better person.
When I see someone get into a car accident ahead of me, I stop and help if I can even if it means it cuts into my video game time at home. I don't need God to tell me that it is the right thing to do to pause The Office to help my neighbor jump start his car. I don't need God to tell me that I love my wife and that I would not cheat on her.
I think I would still help people if they needed it and it was convenient. I don't really see a reason to NOT help someone. I don't think that I would do less good, I'd just do more bad. Selfish acts that benefit myself that I would no longer find 'morally wrong' because nothing actual means anything and there really isn't much of a right and wrong to speak of. I think that I just wouldn't give a fuck.
So the question I like to pose to the forum is what would actually happen to these people if they could be convinced en-mass that there was no God? Would we see divorce rates go through the roof? Would there be a mass exodus from all charity giving and volunteerism? What would happen?
You're probably right that not a lot would change. My day-to-day behavior wouldn't really be any differnt, but my attitude would be. I wouldn't just go on a murder spree or anything, but I think I would be a lot more apathetic. Over a lifetime, I suspect that things would go differently for me.
they forget that what makes us human is our inability to survive without community and cooperation. As nuclear as we have become in the west, we still vitally depend on those around us for both our happiness and existence and I don't see that changing any time soon.
Now that I think about it, I don't think I would ever fuck over my family and friends for my own benefit, even while disbelieving god.
quote:
You need the ones you love, and love the ones you need.
I'd still care about my family and friends even without god's existence. I don't think my apathy could go that far.

Science fails to recognize the single most potent element of human existence.
Letting the reigns go to the unfolding is faith, faith, faith, faith.
Science has failed our world.
Science has failed our Mother Earth.
-System of a Down, "Science"
He who makes a beast out of himself, gets rid of the pain of being a man.
-Avenged Sevenfold, "Bat Country"

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Jazzns, posted 05-29-2007 12:16 PM Jazzns has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by Woodsy, posted 05-30-2007 4:59 PM New Cat's Eye has replied
 Message 10 by Phat, posted 05-30-2007 5:41 PM New Cat's Eye has replied
 Message 12 by Neutralmind, posted 05-30-2007 6:14 PM New Cat's Eye has replied
 Message 16 by nator, posted 05-30-2007 8:13 PM New Cat's Eye has replied
 Message 19 by Jazzns, posted 05-30-2007 11:06 PM New Cat's Eye has replied
 Message 26 by Modulous, posted 05-31-2007 9:22 AM New Cat's Eye has replied
 Message 123 by macaroniandcheese, posted 06-05-2007 1:21 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 28 of 180 (403005)
05-31-2007 11:40 AM
Reply to: Message 6 by Woodsy
05-30-2007 4:59 PM


Whatever your religion may be doing for you, it sure isn't giving you elegance in speech! Whatever your religion may be doing for you, it sure isn't giving you elegance in speech!
Boo-fucking-Hoo.
There's no reason for personal insults, crybaby.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by Woodsy, posted 05-30-2007 4:59 PM Woodsy has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 29 of 180 (403006)
05-31-2007 11:41 AM
Reply to: Message 10 by Phat
05-30-2007 5:41 PM


Re: Inner and Outer reality
Exclusivity finally gets a soapbox!
Catholic Scientist writes:
One of the reasons that I desire to be good to people is that I think they are special, because of god. I don't really care about the other animals that much.
So does that mean that without God, we would torture cats and shoot more rabbits? Would Bambi be in danger??
Nope.
Without god, do you think that a tiger would torture you? (and lets not get into defining ”torture’, I’m just using the same word you used. You could replace it with ”maim’ if you want)
I think that the core question of this thread is that if our intellects were wiped clean of God, would our inner transformation that we believe so strongly in also get wiped clean?
I think not.
Me neither,
I also think that this inner transformation is not just limited to those who say the sinners prayer, take communion, or belong to an organized religion.
Whatever.
Catholic Scientist writes:
If we're all godless animals without any real meaning to our existence, then fuck all y'all, gimme mine. None of this shit matters anymore. But then, maybe I'm just a bad person. You should be glad that I believe in god. It makes me a better person.
  • There are many who profess belief in God who still behave as if there were no God.
  • I read once where an observation was made that deathbed conversions are essentially a glorified myth. The way that a person believes and behaves throughout their life is essentially the way that they leave this life.
    In other words, fear should never be a motivation to believe, nor should unbelief ever be a motivation to misbehave. IMHO anyway.
  • Thanks for the words of wisdom, phat

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 10 by Phat, posted 05-30-2007 5:41 PM Phat has not replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 124 by macaroniandcheese, posted 06-05-2007 1:27 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

      
    New Cat's Eye
    Inactive Member


    Message 30 of 180 (403007)
    05-31-2007 11:42 AM
    Reply to: Message 12 by Neutralmind
    05-30-2007 6:14 PM


    If we're all godless animals without any real meaning to our existence, then fuck all y'all, gimme mine. None of this shit matters anymore. But then, maybe I'm just a bad person
    Hm, funny. I feel exactly the same way too, even though I don't believe in a creator. It's just that I can't be convinced there isn't one either.
    Welcome to the disgusting club.
    I don't really see a reason to NOT help someone. I don't think that I would do less good, I'd just do more bad. Selfish acts that benefit myself that I would no longer find 'morally wrong' because nothing actual means anything and there really isn't much of a right and wrong to speak of. I think that I just wouldn't give a fuck.
    I'd say "wise words" if it wasn't for all that profanity
    I too see no reason to not help someone, as long as it's convenient for me. That's why people/I would still do good even if it was certain there was no creator. Just would ignore all helping that isn't convenient.
    Maybe, if you believed in god, you would do more good

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 12 by Neutralmind, posted 05-30-2007 6:14 PM Neutralmind has not replied

      
    New Cat's Eye
    Inactive Member


    Message 31 of 180 (403008)
    05-31-2007 11:44 AM
    Reply to: Message 16 by nator
    05-30-2007 8:13 PM


    quote:
    Selfish acts that benefit myself that I would no longer find 'morally wrong' because nothing actual means anything and there really isn't much of a right and wrong to speak of. I think that I just wouldn't give a fuck.
    As long as you weren't hurting others, why would this be bad?
    I guess if nobody is getting hurt then it really isn’t bad.
    But there are things, like stealing a pack of gum from Walmart, that don’t hurt anybody in particular that are still bad. And there are things, like self defense, that hurt other people that aren’t bad.
    I can’t simply use ”hurting others’ as an absolute for determining if something is good or bad.
    quote:
    If we're all godless animals without any real meaning to our existence, then fuck all y'all, gimme mine. None of this shit matters anymore. But then, maybe I'm just a bad person. You should be glad that I believe in god. It makes me a better person.
    I don't see that as making you a better (moral) person.
    So? I didn’t type better (moral) person. It makes me a better person because of my actions, not my philosophy behind the actions.
    In the way you've described yourself, it appears to me that you are an immoral person who is behaving well only because he fears being punished.
    That’s how most people are. Take away the punishments or penalties for the bad behavior and people are going to be bad.
    Ever been in a mosh pit? Its practically lawless in there. There’s guys in there groping girls and picking pockets. If your in a mosh pit trying to be nice to everyone, you’re going to get groped and robbed.
    Or how about Mardi Gras or a riot? People go balls to the walls when there’s no penalties for their behavior.
    A moral (good) person would behave well because they are able to empathise with other people; being able to know that other people feel pain and hurt when they are treated badly, and as we understand how the pain feels ourselves, we do not wish to be the cause of pain to others, either.
    And these people rely on the penalties to keep the bad guys in line in order for this to work. Otherwise, while you’re trying to be nice to everybody, bad people are going to be getting the best of you.
    How long do you think Walmart would last if there were no penalties for stealing?
    I thought that the whole of Christian morality was structured around the Golden Rule; "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."?
    In other words, "Don't be a selfish asshole because you wouldn't want to be treated that way by somebody else."
    What about when you’re surrounded by selfish assholes? It doesn’t work so good then.
    And I guess that’s where our differences begin. Most of the people I encounter are not “moral (good) persons” as you described above. We need to have laws and penalties to keep these people in line.
    As you've described it, you seem to be operating under the philosophy of, "I shouldn't act like a selfish asshole because of bad things that may happen to ME if I do."
    In other words, you are still only thinking of yourself.
    Yeah, as self defense.

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 16 by nator, posted 05-30-2007 8:13 PM nator has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 53 by nator, posted 05-31-2007 6:02 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied
     Message 125 by macaroniandcheese, posted 06-05-2007 1:30 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

      
    New Cat's Eye
    Inactive Member


    Message 32 of 180 (403009)
    05-31-2007 11:46 AM
    Reply to: Message 19 by Jazzns
    05-30-2007 11:06 PM


    If we're all godless animals without any real meaning to our existence, then fuck all y'all, gimme mine. None of this shit matters anymore. But then, maybe I'm just a bad person. You should be glad that I believe in god. It makes me a better person.
    So you are readily admitting that you are a bad person by default and only because of your belief in a supernatural father figure to do suppress your "badness"?
    No. I don’t think that I am a bad person and belief in a supernatural father figure is not the only thing suppressing my “badness”. But it does act as additional suppression.
    I think that most of us are sorta bad by default. I also think we could resort to “badness” very quickly if necessary (or even just convenient). I think that a lot of people need penalties to keep them good.
    I guess.. I don't know.. I have may have to apologize ahead of time for what I am about to say. I personally think that is one of the most disgusting things I have ever heard.
    There’s much more disgusting things to be heard. If you want to bury your head in the sand pretending everyone is outside being nice to each other and nothing is disgusting, then have fun.

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 19 by Jazzns, posted 05-30-2007 11:06 PM Jazzns has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 39 by Jazzns, posted 05-31-2007 3:11 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

      
    New Cat's Eye
    Inactive Member


    Message 33 of 180 (403011)
    05-31-2007 11:47 AM
    Reply to: Message 26 by Modulous
    05-31-2007 9:22 AM


    One of the reasons that my morality hinges on my belief in god is that without god, I see humans as 'just another animal'. One of the reasons that I desire to be good to people is that I think they are special, because of god. I don't really care about the other animals that much.
    The other animals don't care about you too much either, but some of them value other animals in a special way.
    Are you just talking about primates? I think an animal, in general, values another animal for its own benefit. They are ”thinking’ of themselves first.
    If we're all godless animals without any real meaning to our existence, then fuck all y'all, gimme mine. None of this shit matters anymore. But then, maybe I'm just a bad person. You should be glad that I believe in god. It makes me a better person.
    There are plenty of godless animals that don't just fuck each other over or have the attitude "fuck y'all" - instead they help each other out, share food, groom and play together...they help out friends and family, and scorn enemies (either fighting them, or just as a group exiling rule breakers). Either social animals believe in God, or belief in God is irrelevant to adhering to social rules of right and wrong.
    Belief in god is irrelevant to adhering to social rules of right and wrong. It can, however, provide additional incentive to adhere to the rules. Or does that make it relevant?

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 26 by Modulous, posted 05-31-2007 9:22 AM Modulous has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 36 by Modulous, posted 05-31-2007 1:13 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

      
    New Cat's Eye
    Inactive Member


    Message 34 of 180 (403013)
    05-31-2007 12:00 PM
    Reply to: Message 21 by nator
    05-31-2007 7:01 AM


    quote:
    The ability to empathise is just an ability, it is not a motivation.
    I disagree.
    It is an ability, and it is a motivation.
    It also seems to be quite hard-wired into humans, and is only completely absent in a very small percentage of the population, whom we call "sociopaths". Such people generally have different brain anatomy than the rest of us.
    That's bullshit. There are a lot of non-sociopathic people that are not empathetic and are only good because there are penalties for the bad behavior.
    You got rose colored glasses.
    The ability to feel hunger is just an ability, it is not a motivation [to eat].
    But there are penalties for not eating. There aren't any penalties for not being empathetic (while also not being bad).
    It is not an ability and a motivation.
    we evolved to feel empathy in order to motivate us to live together in cohesive social groups
    Nah. That's too much causation, you got it backwards. We lived in social groups therefore we evolved empathy. But it doesn't require hard-wrining. People could just fake the empathy to stay in the group.

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 21 by nator, posted 05-31-2007 7:01 AM nator has not replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 35 by Taz, posted 05-31-2007 1:13 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied
     Message 40 by Jazzns, posted 05-31-2007 3:13 PM New Cat's Eye has replied
     Message 42 by Rahvin, posted 05-31-2007 3:47 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

      
    New Cat's Eye
    Inactive Member


    Message 38 of 180 (403031)
    05-31-2007 2:40 PM
    Reply to: Message 36 by Modulous
    05-31-2007 1:13 PM


    Re: reasons to love, reasons to hate
    I think an animal, in general, values another animal for its own benefit. They are ”thinking’ of themselves first.
    Actually, I think an animal values another animal for the benefit of its own genes. I don't think humans differ from any other animal in this regard.
    What about the people who claim they do the right thing simply because it is the right thing, and not because of selfish reason, and find people that are willing to admit selfishness as a reason to be disgusting?
    Belief in god is irrelevant to adhering to social rules of right and wrong. It can, however, provide additional incentive to adhere to the rules.
    Indeed - us humans can definitely conceive of other punishments, even punishments that are seemingly impossible (like a thousand years of burning). If we believe that those punishments will be exacted for doing certain things, we might be more motivated to not do those certain things more than others. That is part and parcel of of having forethought - it works for real punishments too ("hand me the money or I will shoot you").
    So you don’t find these reasons for good behavior to be disgusting?
    It is likely that animals like merecats don't have the extent of foresight that we do - and they simply cooperate with the group because that is the 'right' thing to do as far as merecatity is concerned. Likewise, most humans go along with societies rules because they are generally the 'right' thing to do as far as humanity is concerned.
    I don’t really think that people, in general, “care” much about things doing the right thing. I think they are just following societal pressure to do the right thing. Without the pressure (ie remove the penalties), and people will do what they can get away with doing as we see in riots and mobs, etc.
    So even if we are godless animals without any real meaning to our existence, then it is not "fuck y'all" for most humans.
    But all you need is a local majority of “fuck yall”’s to screw over all the righteous people. The righteous people need to maintain the ability to enter the “fuck yall” mentality as a defense against it.
    If you knew there was no God would you rape and kill your neighbour for the contents of their house? Probably not. If you lived in a small tribe, you might go and kill the other small tribe over there and steal the contents of their house. Not only are you not going to be punished for it, but it doesn't necessarily scream against your humanity to do it.
    That’s what I’m talkin’ ”bout.
    In the big picture, people aren’t as righteous as Schraff seems to think they are.
    Believing in a God doesn't necessarily stop you - it will only serve as a justification for the way you behave...
    But if it serves as a justification for avoiding bad behavior, then isn’t it stopping you?
    Less compassion for the outgroup is well documented and religous persuasion is only another grouping for their to be an outgroup from.
    That seems, to me at least, to be a fault of the specifics of the religion and not of religion, in general. I agree that religion offers another label that can be used for outgrouping, but I don’t think the religion is the cause.
    Did you see that episode of South Park where religion was gone, and they had all the atheist leagues fighting against each other? I think it makes a good point that people are going to quarrel regardless. All you need is two groups and some time. Sure, religions have been used this way, as has nationality and all kinds of stuff. I don’t think it is the fault of the particular label, its just something we do as people.
    If you weren't religious, maybe you'd be a worse person. Maybe you wouldn't, and instead of talking to god, you'd talk directly to your humanity before you did something ethically questionable.
    But without god, I enter this nihilistic mentality where, because we are just another animal and like where you said we don’t differ from them above, we are only being righteous for selfish reasons. When you add god, you add another layer to existence that can include non-selfish reasons for righteous behavior. This makes us different from the other animals, and in turn provides a reason for deserving the righteous actions.
    To the OP, personally I think that religion serves us now by providing another layer of grouping. Another us versus them mentality above and beyond the layer of nation. If we removed that grouping by removing faith, we might find that there are less reasons to distrust/hate another group. One less us versus them.
    Like I was saying with the South Park reference, its not the layers themselves that cause the behavior. People are that way naturally. If you remove one of the layers, then that gap will be fill with something else, IMHO.
    People will still find reasons to dislike people of course. And yes, some people may find they are more willing to commit social and legal crimes because they are not deterred by the current potential punishment as opposed to the definite punishment promised through certain faiths, but I think that is a fair price to pay.
    You’re assuming that it is going to make a difference, that there will be something valuable that we’re paying for. I can see why you think that and don’t really have anything to refute it. But I don’t really think that its going to stop anything. If you remove religion, people are just going to find some other bullshit to fight over, IMHO.
    Now - can we talk about those damned commie-French? I think it wise we don't even begin to discuss the shifty asians or women or shifty asian women. Before we do though, us Stretfordians have got some beef to sort out with the Heaton Park posse.
    I have no idea what your talking about . Looks like a joke that is over my head.

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 36 by Modulous, posted 05-31-2007 1:13 PM Modulous has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 50 by cavediver, posted 05-31-2007 4:49 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied
     Message 64 by Modulous, posted 06-01-2007 2:21 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

      
    New Cat's Eye
    Inactive Member


    Message 41 of 180 (403042)
    05-31-2007 3:37 PM
    Reply to: Message 39 by Jazzns
    05-31-2007 3:11 PM


    Well, even though I did not say anything even remotly to that extent, I can sort of understand how someone as coarse as you have been in this thread could invent that characture based on how I feel about this absurd tendency for religious people to abandon all dignity and humanity with their mythology.
    I have been overly coarse. I'm sorry, I've been having a bad week and I'm kinda crabby.
    this absurd tendency for religious people to abandon all dignity and humanity with their mythology
    I just want to point out that I wouldn't abandon all dignity and humanity.
    But I tend to think that it is a lot worse for people to KNOW that they WILL BECOME assholes the very moment they stop believing in fairy tales.
    First of all, its hypothetical, I don't KNOW that I'd turn to asshole-ism. I just think that I would be more asshole-ish if I stopped believing in a particular fairy tales. Why is that so bad?
    There very well may be value in faith but it is not because it provides some invisible force to stop you from being a selfish jerk.
    That is what I find disgusting.
    Why do you find that disgusting?

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 39 by Jazzns, posted 05-31-2007 3:11 PM Jazzns has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 44 by Jazzns, posted 05-31-2007 3:51 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

      
    New Cat's Eye
    Inactive Member


    Message 43 of 180 (403046)
    05-31-2007 3:50 PM
    Reply to: Message 40 by Jazzns
    05-31-2007 3:13 PM


    But there are penalties for not eating. There aren't any penalties for not being empathetic (while also not being bad).
    Says who? You?
    I can think of plenty of penalties for never having empathy.
    That's kinda a Strawman.
    Not being empathetic is different from never having empathy. And I was using penalty in the context of how pain is the penalty for not eating.

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 40 by Jazzns, posted 05-31-2007 3:13 PM Jazzns has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 45 by Jazzns, posted 05-31-2007 3:57 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

      
    New Cat's Eye
    Inactive Member


    Message 47 of 180 (403050)
    05-31-2007 4:13 PM
    Reply to: Message 42 by Rahvin
    05-31-2007 3:47 PM


    But there are penalties for not eating. There aren't any penalties for not being empathetic (while also not being bad).
    It is not an ability and a motivation.
    Penalties are irrelevant. Read this, from here:
    Well, it looks like we need to get more data before we make a definitive conclusion.
    But, the implications of the conclusion could blow my argument right out of the water
    I think the idea that, without some deity, we would all convert into selfish, immoral anarchists is complete horseshit.
    I’m not arguing that idea.
    But the evolution of empathy IS, in fact, what allowed society to form, despite the fact that it seems the trait evolved long before humans were walking around.
    Point taken.
    That's bullshit. There are a lot of non-sociopathic people that are not empathetic and are only good because there are penalties for the bad behavior.
    You got rose colored glasses.
    Actually, I'd say ALL people who possess no ability to feel empathy are, in fact, sociopaths.
    I shouldn’t have put that word only in there. There are a lot of people that have the ability to feel empathy, but are not empathetic and are good because of the penalties that are not sociopaths. I’m not saying these people have NO ability to feel empathy, just that they are not empathetic or don’t care to use their ability. People who are unable to feel empathy are sociopaths by definition.
    I think you're just afraid to call people who feel no empathy sociopaths because, by your own admission earlier, it may in fact make you one of them.
    But I do have the ability to feel empathy so I’m not a sociopath.

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 42 by Rahvin, posted 05-31-2007 3:47 PM Rahvin has not replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 54 by nator, posted 05-31-2007 6:13 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

      
    New Cat's Eye
    Inactive Member


    Message 49 of 180 (403055)
    05-31-2007 4:45 PM
    Reply to: Message 44 by Jazzns
    05-31-2007 3:51 PM


    It seems kind of weird that one of the knee jerk reactions from the openly religious is to say, "heck yea I would be bad/selfish/immoral if there was no god" and that once they think about it for a minute they realize that this is not really true at all.
    Some bad/selfish/immoral behavior feels pretty good or provides positive effects. For people of faith, the big eye in the sky is one more reason, and sometimes the only reason, to not behave that way. When you take away that reason, the benefits to the bad behavior seem to outweigh the penalties.
    quote:
    Oh, there ”s no god? You mean, I can go sleep with a bunch of whores with no penalty? Let’s do it!
    Its not that hard to extrapolate that to include other stuff too. But when you think about it, you’re not going to go and do things that are very obviously immoral. And those things are easier said than done.
    before the religious slowly learned that there are good non-religious reasons to give, volunteer, etc.
    I think its more about the reasons for avoiding the bad behavior than for doing the good. The non-religious reasons to give and volunteer are much more obvious than the non-religious reasons for not fornicating. But then, I do that anyways, so .
    That brings up two points.
    Maybe fornicating is not wrong.
    Maybe it is and you need god to understand why.
    When you take god out, you’re only left with the first.
    Even without god, I can think of reasons to avoid fornication, but not for the immorality of it. Which is why I do it, I guess.
    The claim being examined is that, " religion is good because it keeps me from a monster". That is not a good argument. Your latest post just softened it up with words like "hypothetical" and "more asshole-ish".
    All you have to do is conflate hypothetically more asshole-ishness with being a monster and badda-bing, same thing
    But it is still shocking I feel that this is the initial reaction that religious people have when confronted with the idea of abandoning their faith.
    It probably comes from being told that things, that have no obvious non-religious reason for being immoral, are immoral because god says so.
    It not that hard to start lumping in things that are obviously immoral and say that you would do those too.

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 44 by Jazzns, posted 05-31-2007 3:51 PM Jazzns has not replied

      
    New Cat's Eye
    Inactive Member


    Message 74 of 180 (403277)
    06-01-2007 4:53 PM
    Reply to: Message 54 by nator
    05-31-2007 6:13 PM


    Mostly, it is young males who behave poorly, especially when they are under the influence of drugs or adrenaline or in a mob mentality situation.
    Or maybe it is old ladies who are the only nice ones.
    I'm not talking about mobs or mosh pits. I'm talking about everyday, mundane life.
    But as an aside, I have indeed been in a mosh pit or two. At the Lilith Fair, for example, I was never groped even though I was surrounded by lots of lesbians and quite a few men. I just went to a great English Beat show and was right down there in front dancing and jumping with everybody else and didn't have a problem. I even left my purse unattended at my seat.
    quote:
    Most of the people I encounter are not “moral (good) persons” as you described above.
    Maybe because like attracts like?
    I mean, seriously, maybe you repell all of the nice people because you, yourself are a selfish asshole and they can sense that? Then, all that's left are the jerks.
    Well, actually, I’m quite charming I think the anonymity brings out the worst in me
    I have never had a problem finding lots of good folks to be around.
    Consider yourself lucky.
    quote:
    There are a lot of people that have the ability to feel empathy, but are not empathetic and are good because of the penalties that are not sociopaths. I’m not saying these people have NO ability to feel empathy, just that they are not empathetic or don’t care to use their ability.
    How can someone choose to not feel something, I wonder?
    By performing the action anyways, even though it makes them feel bad. Or by ignoring their feelings. I didn’t say they could choose to not feel something.

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 54 by nator, posted 05-31-2007 6:13 PM nator has not replied

      
    New Cat's Eye
    Inactive Member


    Message 75 of 180 (403279)
    06-01-2007 4:55 PM
    Reply to: Message 64 by Modulous
    06-01-2007 2:21 AM


    Re: reasons to love, reasons to hate
    Normally I don't take their word for it. I might then refer them to a book like the selfish gene.
    Never read it Maybe I’ll take a look.
    I'd be disgusted with any human who only behaved with humanity out of fear of being punished.
    Why? More than by a person who didn’t behave with humanity? Why does their motive matter so much as long as they are still humane?
    But all you need is a local majority of “fuck yall”’s to screw over all the righteous people. The righteous people need to maintain the ability to enter the “fuck yall” mentality as a defense against it.
    Right. As I said - I don't think a local majority of fuck y'alls happens very often in social animals - it tends to lead to a survival problem.
    But it has happened in humans a lot. Go figure.
    Locally humans are very nice to each other.
    I see that. I even mentioned something similar in my first message in this thread.
    But if it serves as a justification for avoiding bad behavior, then isn’t it stopping you?
    No. It is 'after the event' justification. As in, God would just be the reason we give for either going to battle, or avoiding going to battle. It would only come into it after the mind has been made up.
    It doesn’t always happen that way with me. I think that my belief in god helps make up my mind.
    Religion is certainly not the cause of outgrouping. Evolution is the cause of outgrouping.
    I'm not blaming a label, I'm saying the fewer labels available the better.
    Ok, I think I get your drift now. Thanks.
    When you add god, you add another layer to existence that can include non-selfish reasons for righteous behavior.
    I think fear of punishment is the most selfish reason for good behaviour going.
    Its not wholly “fear of punishment”, though. Just sayin’.
    I agree that there will be plenty of other things to fight over. Like those communists, the French, and shifty asian women. We fight over them already - I can't see any disadvantages to remvoving one reason to fight over something, and only advantages to be had.
    But there are some advantages to having religion, so it comes down to how you weight it out.

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 64 by Modulous, posted 06-01-2007 2:21 AM Modulous has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 82 by Modulous, posted 06-02-2007 5:33 AM New Cat's Eye has not replied

      
    Newer Topic | Older Topic
    Jump to:


    Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

    ™ Version 4.2
    Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024