ogon writes:
As Percy rightly says, I’m one person against many
Sorry if it seems like ganging up, but it's nothing personal! I've noticed that, because your O.P. makes it clear that you're from the U.K., that a lot of Brits have responded, even though the teaching of evolution/creationism has never been such a big issue here as it is in the U.S.
Evolution and creation can never be compatible
Actually, it's a bit more complicated than that. Science doesn't actually have any essential conflict with a belief like:
"God created the universe"
Science cannot give an opinion on whether or not such a statement is true, because it is confined to studying the natural universe, and cannot deal with the supernatural, because supernatural propositions like "God" cannot be tested for, proven or disproven.
For all practical purposes, you could regard science as being agnostic on the question of such a God.
However, the confusion comes in with types or interpretations of religions which have their Gods creating imaginary universes, or false realities.
Examples of these are the flat earthers and the young earthers.
The former interpret various verses of the bible as meaning that the earth must be flat (they still exist, religious faith is a powerful force!), and the latter believe that the earth must be less than 10,000 years old, based, again, on interpretations of the bible.
What happens here is that there is an inevitable conflict between evidence based science and these false realities, and therefore, indirectly, with the clearly imaginary Gods that are supposed to have created them.
So, you see, it is possible to be both a believer in a creator God and a supporter of the theory of evolution, but only if your God created reality!