quote:
Since art is a deliberate act
You are no artist. This is not a true statement. Look up "happy accident" in Japanese art.
Do you rest your case upon Happy Art? Its fairly simple concept: You pick up a brush, dab it in paint, smear the paint on to the canvas in such a way that corresponds to the mental image in your mind... Art.
You can't say art isn't deliberate. You didn't arbitrarily fall in to some paint and magically produced artwork. Its intentional. At the most, something may come out in a way that you didn't entirely hope for, but the main point is, you were there trying to create something.
False conclusion, even without the false precept. You are missing a(n assumed) premise.
How so?
quote:
but I think it presents a problem for you.
And we see, again, that your logic is inadequate to make this claim.
And we see, again, your inability of explaining why its inadequate. If my "logic fails," you have to present reasons why. That's generally how rebuttals work.
quote:
Secondly, any involvement of God, whether for amusement, education, or entertainment nullifies every premise of evolution going through unguided processes.
Just because you want to make this conclusion does not mean it follows from your argument. It doesn't.
It very, very simple RAZD... If God set anything in motion for some purpose, be it for entertainment, musings, education, or whatever, there is a clear desire for a resulting action that follows-- which will invariably factor out unguided processes altogether. Think about that deeply for a moment.
Please tell me how a mobile operates solely by guided processes.
A mobile?
your god is supposed to be a hands on in every life control freak who is omniscient and all powerful, fully aware of and able to control consequences, so your arguments apply more to your belief than to mine.
If my God were a control freak, you'd be on your face right now worshiping Him. My God is no such thing.
"It is better to shun the bait, than struggle in the snare." -Ravi Zacharias
™ Version 4.2
