Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,901 Year: 4,158/9,624 Month: 1,029/974 Week: 356/286 Day: 12/65 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Reaching the practical end of physics?
GDR
Member
Posts: 6202
From: Sidney, BC, Canada
Joined: 05-22-2005
Member Rating: 2.1


Message 38 of 68 (437767)
12-01-2007 11:56 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Silent H
11-27-2007 9:33 PM


Silent H writes:
From what I can tell... and this may be wayyyyy off... all these fundamental particles (quarks, leptons, etc) don't last long in the "real world". That is to say, no matter how much we pick them apart, they fall back together (or reduce to energy) such that they have no value beyond understanding the esoteric properties of the universe.
My knowledge of this stuff is limited to reading Brian Greene and others like him, so my question is based not on knowledge but out of interest. I have looked at web sites of people like Julian Barbour and it seems to me that the next big thing in physics might be time, which could affect the premise of your question.
Is it possible, or even likely, that we will be able to use the scientific method to understand how time impacts our existence in the same way that relativity and QM have?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Silent H, posted 11-27-2007 9:33 PM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 41 by Silent H, posted 12-01-2007 2:54 PM GDR has replied

  
GDR
Member
Posts: 6202
From: Sidney, BC, Canada
Joined: 05-22-2005
Member Rating: 2.1


Message 42 of 68 (437825)
12-01-2007 3:34 PM
Reply to: Message 41 by Silent H
12-01-2007 2:54 PM


Silent H writes:
As far as I understand it relativity does get at how time impacts our existence. I would love to have better models, though I don't think direct manipulation of time will ever be possible.
Actually I was thinking about time in the quantum realm. If they could do that I think it could provide the link between relativity and QM.

Everybody is entitled to my opinion.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by Silent H, posted 12-01-2007 2:54 PM Silent H has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024