Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,920 Year: 4,177/9,624 Month: 1,048/974 Week: 7/368 Day: 7/11 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is there any reason that the US government should be trusted?
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 5 of 25 (439499)
12-08-2007 10:48 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by jar
12-08-2007 7:15 PM


The whole government?
The latest example of the moral bankruptcy of the current US administration is the distruction of the video tapes of CIA interrogations.
As the evidence continues to mount, incident after incident, is there ANY reason for US citizens to place any trust in our government?
Well, in the very opening statement of your link, it says:
"The Justice Department and the Central Intelligence Agency’s internal watchdog on Saturday began a joint preliminary inquiry into the spy agency’s destruction of hundreds of hours of videotapes showing interrogations of top operatives of Al Qaeda."
That means that people working for the internal affairs of the government, government employees themselves, broke the case wide open. Instead of asking if the entire government could be trusted, why not ask whether or not certain individuals could be trusted?

“This life’s dim windows of the soul, distorts the heavens from pole to pole, and goads you to believe a lie, when you see with and not through the eye.” -William Blake

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by jar, posted 12-08-2007 7:15 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by jar, posted 12-08-2007 10:50 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 7 of 25 (439512)
12-08-2007 11:07 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by jar
12-08-2007 10:50 PM


Re: The whole government?
Actually they only did that after newspapers threatened to break the story and after it came out in testimony that the tapes were not available.
Where did you come across this information? From what I gather from the link, it was an operative named Jose A. Rodriguez Jr that solicited that information in lieu of his upcoming retirement. And then it went on to say that the White House officials asked that they not destroy the tapes prior to their supposed destruction.
And yes, the whole Government, at ALL levels.
That's silly, Jar. So you can't trust anyone in any government position? Not the Supreme Court, Dept of Agriculture, Dept of Education, Dept of Homeland Security, Dept of Treasury, Dept of Labor, etc, etc? I assume also that it means you won't be voting... ever.
Come on, Jar. First of all, supposing the CIA did destroy tapes (innocence before guilt), that only comes from one tiny fraction of the US government. If they did do it, is it messed up? Heck yeah. Should they pay whatever penalty that exists within the US Code if found guilty? Heck yeah. But blaming the entirety of the US government to show your disdain seems like a bit much.
AbE: and why should we trust any internal investigation by the very Justice Department that has been show to ignore civil and Constitutional Rights?
You are taking individuals and saying that it encompasses the entire department. That's not fair. That's what racists do. You wouldn't want to blame an entire group of people based on something that some individuals have done, would you?

“This life’s dim windows of the soul, distorts the heavens from pole to pole, and goads you to believe a lie, when you see with and not through the eye.” -William Blake

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by jar, posted 12-08-2007 10:50 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by jar, posted 12-08-2007 11:17 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 9 of 25 (439549)
12-09-2007 1:20 AM
Reply to: Message 8 by jar
12-08-2007 11:17 PM


Re: The whole government?
No, I will vote. I expect once again though that an attempt will be made to steal the election and falsify the results, but hopefully there will be enough folk that distrust the government to oversee the election and catch whatever fraud is there.
At the risk of dragging this OT, I won't ask about the stealing of elections. But if the government is as corrupt as you say, then why not just become an anarchist? Why not an overthrow of the government? Why not try to get people to subvert the government if this is how you feel? But more importantly, if every person within the government is corrupt, then why would you vote government officials? If they're ALL bad then what difference does it make?
You know, I think Crashfrog works for the US government. Is your buddy an evil co-conspirator too?
I would be in favor of some outside agent, maybe the UN, coming in to oversee our elections.
The only reason the UN exists is because of the US government, the very thing you are railing against. That hardly sounds impartial. Secondly, if the UN is an outside agency, then what gives them the authority to govern the government?
But that is always your excuse every time an example of governmental misconduct is discovered; "Oh, it's only that part that holds phony press conferences. It's only that part that redacts testimony. It's only that part that suppresses data. It's only that part that condones torture."
Always? Like hyperbole much? I've said it maybe twice, and only because its true. Its ridiculous to assert that everyone working for the government is corrupt. If you were to conclude that, then every single person is corrupt on the same basis, even you. If that's the case, condemn yourself.
Of course it is fair, this is not a race, it is a business, and it has been shown to be corrupt from bottom to top. It is a perversion.
No its not fair because its tantamount to prejudice. You are prejudging people in the government, when it was a government employee that exposed the allegations in the first place.
If certain members of the CIA were destroying evidence, then let the US government prosecute them on that basis. Even up to the Supreme Court, who, ironically enough, are government employees.
Are you ready to say that in your zeal that you overstepped your bounds -- that not everyone in the government is the anti-christ?
I mean, imagine some people in the CIA. Imagine them saying to the culprits, "Hey thanks guys for perpetuating the stereotype. We really appreciate it. Thanks to you, cantankerous souls living in Texas think we're just like you."
Edited by Nemesis Juggernaut, : No reason given.

“This life’s dim windows of the soul, distorts the heavens from pole to pole, and goads you to believe a lie, when you see with and not through the eye.” -William Blake

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by jar, posted 12-08-2007 11:17 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by crashfrog, posted 12-09-2007 2:29 AM Hyroglyphx has replied
 Message 11 by jar, posted 12-09-2007 11:21 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 12 of 25 (439581)
12-09-2007 11:56 AM
Reply to: Message 10 by crashfrog
12-09-2007 2:29 AM


Re: The whole government?
I wonder if the term "organized crime" means anything to you, if there's absolutely no point at which, for you, the members of an organization are involved in so many crimes that the organization itself must be regarded as criminal.
Okay, so you basically want to see RICO charges drummed up on every government employee, is that accurate? If so, you and I are screwed.
How many separate, individual acts of corruption and malfeasance have to be uncovered, exposed, prosecuted, and ultimately pardoned by the President before it's safe to conclude that the Bush Administration is ordering people to commit criminal acts?

“This life’s dim windows of the soul, distorts the heavens from pole to pole, and goads you to believe a lie, when you see with and not through the eye.” -William Blake

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by crashfrog, posted 12-09-2007 2:29 AM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by jar, posted 12-09-2007 12:09 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied
 Message 14 by crashfrog, posted 12-09-2007 1:01 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 15 of 25 (439613)
12-09-2007 2:40 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by crashfrog
12-09-2007 1:01 PM


Re: The whole government?
Not at all. I simply want those responsible for instituting a culture of corruption, those responsible for ordering illegal acts, those responsible for protecting those acts, and those guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity brought to justice.
Then you are in agreement with me. Jar is saying that from top to bottom, any and all people within the government is a criminal. Rather than being hyperbolic about the whole thing, maybe he should just go after those who are committing the crimes, like you and I suggest.
quote:
How many separate, individual acts of corruption and malfeasance have to be uncovered, exposed, prosecuted, and ultimately pardoned by the President before it's safe to conclude that the Bush Administration is ordering people to commit criminal acts?
You tell me. Isn't that what I asked you?
Yes. Sorry, I forgot to put quote tags on this.
I would say some evidence beyond anecdote. If Bush is ordering illegal things, then charge and impeach him. So far, no one has been able to do that.
Much of the things that happen within the intelligence community go beyond the President. Not just this president, but all of them. The President of the United States is a bit of a patsy. Proxy wars are fought with or without his expressed approval.
Has the CIA gotten out of control? I don't know. I'm fairly certain they have done many things that are illegal per the Geneva Convention. We simply need more accountability within these shadow agencies. People like the man who blew the whistle on the very case we are now discussing.

“This life’s dim windows of the soul, distorts the heavens from pole to pole, and goads you to believe a lie, when you see with and not through the eye.” -William Blake

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by crashfrog, posted 12-09-2007 1:01 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by crashfrog, posted 12-09-2007 3:49 PM Hyroglyphx has replied
 Message 17 by jar, posted 12-09-2007 3:54 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied
 Message 24 by LouieP, posted 01-11-2008 12:16 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 19 of 25 (439668)
12-09-2007 6:37 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by crashfrog
12-09-2007 3:49 PM


Re: The whole government?
quote:
Jar is saying that from top to bottom, any and all people within the government is a criminal.
I don't see where he's saying that. What he's saying is that nearly every influence of this administration on the government has been a bad influence, and I agree.
If he meant that, then he should have been more clear. I asked him, specifically, if the entire US government is corrupt. In no uncertain terms he stated that, yes, "ALL" of the government.
When someone is ordered to commit a crime, the punishment should be greater for he who ordered it than for he who committed it. Don't you agree?
I would say they share equal liability generally. But I'm sure there are some exceptions to the rule, such as, the perpetrator not having any knowledge of criminality when the one who ordered it does.
We should go after who is responsible for the crimes. I think the responsibility goes right to the top. Not just on some kind of principle; the responsibility goes to the top because that's where the orders came from; that's where the conditions were created that made people give those orders.
Is there any evidence that says it did come from the top? That's what you need to concern yourself with first. And where is the top? General Hayden or President Bush?
Republicans will never allow it, no matter what crimes we know the President has committed.
Republicans or Democrats don't get to decide that. The Supreme Court does.
Do you think that's going to happen when the President creates a culture that punishes whistleblowing?
Why do you think that a culture of whistelblowing is being punished? There are two fundamental things about whistelblowing.
1. The whistleblower is blowing the whistle because there are illegal activities going on. They feel morally obligated to stop the corruption. Then they are either listened to or systematically suppressed for an agenda.
2. The whistleblower is intentionally distorting things to further an agenda coming from their side of the spectrum. Essentially they are slandering someone to further their own agenda.

“This life’s dim windows of the soul, distorts the heavens from pole to pole, and goads you to believe a lie, when you see with and not through the eye.” -William Blake

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by crashfrog, posted 12-09-2007 3:49 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by crashfrog, posted 12-09-2007 6:48 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied
 Message 21 by Silent H, posted 12-09-2007 6:50 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied
 Message 23 by Rrhain, posted 12-15-2007 9:51 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024