Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,910 Year: 4,167/9,624 Month: 1,038/974 Week: 365/286 Day: 8/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   God vs. Science
subbie
Member (Idle past 1284 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 4 of 164 (453479)
02-02-2008 10:20 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Crooked to what standard
02-01-2008 5:34 PM


Not exactly sure what you want to debate here, so I'll toss a few random thoughts out.
If I were in any science class where the professor began with those questions, I'd walk out and demand my money back. I'm pretty sure that this tripe was written by someone whose misapprehensions about science would take a year to correct before they could even get started learning science.
The student looks around the room. "Is there anyone in the class who has ever seen the professor's brain?" The class breaks out into laughter.
"Is there anyone here who has ever heard the professor's brain, felt the professor's brain, touched or smelt the professor's brain? No one appears to have done so. So, according to the established rules of empirical, stable, demonstrable protocol, science says that you have no brain, with all due respect, sir."
"So if science says you have no brain, how can we trust your lectures, sir?"
Now the room is silent. The professor just stares at the student, his face unreadable.
Finally, after what seems an eternity, the old man answers. "I guess you'll have to take them on faith."
I would run, not walk, as fast as I could from any university where the science department saw fit to hire someone as a professor who could not give a better response than this.
As a whole, I'd say that this email you received is probably quite comforting to those who are looking for some kind of trite but substanceless reassurance that faith can overcome science. Instead, if it proves anything, it proves that faith can overcome science only if science is reduced to the level of a village idiot.

Those who would sacrifice an essential liberty for a temporary security will lose both, and deserve neither. -- Benjamin Franklin
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Crooked to what standard, posted 02-01-2008 5:34 PM Crooked to what standard has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 11 by Crooked to what standard, posted 02-03-2008 12:20 AM subbie has replied

  
subbie
Member (Idle past 1284 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 16 of 164 (453586)
02-03-2008 10:24 AM
Reply to: Message 11 by Crooked to what standard
02-03-2008 12:20 AM


Well, what would your answer be?
I certainly wouldn't ever ask a student to take anything I said on faith, even assuming one were addle-pated enough to make such a speech. In addition to saying something along the lines of what Rahvin and Jaderis have already said in this thread, I'd suggest to the rest of the class (having already given up on the dolt who asked the question in the first place) that they decide whether to believe what I tell them in my lectures by learning more about the topic than I'm able to impart to them by talking to them a few minutes a day, then use the brains that I am quite sure that they have and make up their own minds.

Those who would sacrifice an essential liberty for a temporary security will lose both, and deserve neither. -- Benjamin Franklin
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by Crooked to what standard, posted 02-03-2008 12:20 AM Crooked to what standard has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by Crooked to what standard, posted 02-03-2008 11:30 PM subbie has not replied

  
subbie
Member (Idle past 1284 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 86 of 164 (455773)
02-13-2008 6:07 PM
Reply to: Message 84 by Crooked to what standard
02-13-2008 5:53 PM


Okay, let's put this into context. Lets say that:
  • 1 river = 1 life-supporting planet
  • 1 day = 10 years
  • Wow, that was fun! Let me try.
    Let's say that
  • My backyard = the entire universe
  • 5 minutes (the amount of time I wasted trying to find a point in the post I'm responding to) = the age of the universe
    I've spent the age of the universe watching the entire universe and saw no sign of the presence of god. Therefore, not only is there no god, I've demonstrated that anyone who thinks there is even any evidence for the existence of god is demonstrably wrong.

    Those who would sacrifice an essential liberty for a temporary security will lose both, and deserve neither. -- Benjamin Franklin
    We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat

  • This message is a reply to:
     Message 84 by Crooked to what standard, posted 02-13-2008 5:53 PM Crooked to what standard has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 89 by Crooked to what standard, posted 02-13-2008 6:25 PM subbie has not replied

      
    subbie
    Member (Idle past 1284 days)
    Posts: 3509
    Joined: 02-26-2006


    Message 88 of 164 (455776)
    02-13-2008 6:18 PM
    Reply to: Message 87 by Crooked to what standard
    02-13-2008 6:15 PM


    How come ever since man started to record things, we've only seen species go extinct. We've never seen a new species emerge.
    A much more interesting question to ask would be how many times do we have to tell a creo that speciation has been observed in a laboratory setting and in the natural world before the creo will stop spreading the falsehood that we've never seen a new species emerge?

    Those who would sacrifice an essential liberty for a temporary security will lose both, and deserve neither. -- Benjamin Franklin
    We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 87 by Crooked to what standard, posted 02-13-2008 6:15 PM Crooked to what standard has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 90 by Crooked to what standard, posted 02-13-2008 6:27 PM subbie has replied

      
    subbie
    Member (Idle past 1284 days)
    Posts: 3509
    Joined: 02-26-2006


    Message 93 of 164 (455785)
    02-13-2008 6:39 PM
    Reply to: Message 90 by Crooked to what standard
    02-13-2008 6:27 PM


    Ah, the misconceptions abound!
    If new species are emerging, how come we're worried about others going extinct.
    To tell you the truth, I'm not particularly worried about species going extinct. So maybe you should direct that question to someone who is worried about it.
    According to you, these new species are better that the last ones, so shouldn't we be attempting to help evolution create the perfect animal.
    Whoa! Hold on there, buckaroo.
    I never said any species were better than others. Moreoever, I'm pretty sure very few scientists ever said it either. You seem to be confusing the idea of better adapted to survive with a value judgment. The two are not at all the same thing.
    Moreoever, your suggestion that we work on a "perfect" animal displays a tremendous ignorance about evolution. There is no "perfect" animal from an evolutionary perspective; there is only better adapted to the environment and less well-adapted.
    Just for clarification, humans aren't the perfect animal.
    Not sure why you felt that needed clarification, but thanks anyway. Of course, your observation makes me ponder the following point:
    If humans are the divine creation of god in his image, why aren't they the perfect animal?

    Those who would sacrifice an essential liberty for a temporary security will lose both, and deserve neither. -- Benjamin Franklin
    We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 90 by Crooked to what standard, posted 02-13-2008 6:27 PM Crooked to what standard has replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 96 by Crooked to what standard, posted 02-13-2008 8:58 PM subbie has not replied

      
    subbie
    Member (Idle past 1284 days)
    Posts: 3509
    Joined: 02-26-2006


    Message 128 of 164 (455938)
    02-14-2008 3:22 PM
    Reply to: Message 124 by Crooked to what standard
    02-14-2008 3:11 PM


    However, I'm thinking (THINKING) that there are boundaries that won't allow a chimp to reach the human 'house' because of this giant, impassable wall between the two.
    Thinking, hoping, praying, imagining, fantasizing, making up, guessing, assuming....
    Those are all wonderful words. However, in science, we look for evidence. Do you have any of that? Or is it all just a creo dream?

    Those who would sacrifice an essential liberty for a temporary security will lose both, and deserve neither. -- Benjamin Franklin
    We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 124 by Crooked to what standard, posted 02-14-2008 3:11 PM Crooked to what standard has not replied

      
    Newer Topic | Older Topic
    Jump to:


    Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

    ™ Version 4.2
    Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024