Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,909 Year: 4,166/9,624 Month: 1,037/974 Week: 364/286 Day: 7/13 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Clarke's 2001: A Space Odyssey
Taz
Member (Idle past 3321 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 7 of 30 (454773)
02-08-2008 5:10 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by Percy
02-08-2008 4:00 PM


First of all, I'd like to say that DAMN you're old!
Percy writes:
The ending was confusing, but that was incidental.
I've read all the books. The problem that I see with the movie is that a lot of it was about the cold reality of space travel... boredom. When you first saw that movie last century, did you find those parts boring?
PS - They really should make a movie for the third book.
Edited by Taz, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Percy, posted 02-08-2008 4:00 PM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by Percy, posted 02-08-2008 5:50 PM Taz has not replied
 Message 11 by Grizz, posted 02-08-2008 5:52 PM Taz has replied

  
Taz
Member (Idle past 3321 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 18 of 30 (454814)
02-08-2008 7:40 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by Grizz
02-08-2008 5:52 PM


Grizz writes:
Tom Hanks was supposed to have worked on getting a project together but it fell through I think. 3001 sure has the ingredients for a popular film - genetically engineered dinosaurs, Cyborg, and all sorts of techy stuff. You think people would go nuts for it.
Except for one thing. The idea of a thousand year old astronaut floating around in space being reanimated is a little... far fetched.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by Grizz, posted 02-08-2008 5:52 PM Grizz has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024