Since you don't think it predicts the exact same things as modern geology perhaps you can make clearer to me what the differences are. This is how different hypothoses in science are sorted out. The proponents of each are forced to think of what different consequences their idea would have and then they can be tested.
But hey, why just convert now when I can be harrassed, badgered, made fun of, and used as an impecable exmample of a dillusional backdrop to the advancement of science just for my mere interest in delving further than anyone else ever has into these issues!? Fun fun, wouldn't you say! Why would I ever want to miss out on all of that great stuff... :\
It is fun to deliberatly adopt a postion just to get an argument going.
However, if you are a Christian you should read material by Christians and perhaps "converse" with someone like TruthLover here.
I have had very large concerns expressed to me by Christians over the damage that the literalists do. When they hold on to untenable positions for reasons that are obviously (to many, many people) absurd the is some chance that this will cause, unfairly, all Christians to be tared with the same brush.
There are also individuals who, unlike Truthlover, don't manage to make the transition from fundamentalist to a more rational type or Christian. Instead they lose their faith altogether. I may not think this is any great loss. But I would think you would.