Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 78 (8896 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 03-23-2019 12:22 AM
36 online now:
Dredge (1 member, 35 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: WookieeB
Post Volume:
Total: 848,563 Year: 3,600/19,786 Month: 595/1,087 Week: 185/212 Day: 0/27 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Prev1
2
Author Topic:   All Time Classic Creationist Pwnage (Re: Conservapedia and A. Schlafly vs. R. Lenski)
Alasdair
Member (Idle past 3827 days)
Posts: 143
Joined: 05-13-2005


Message 16 of 22 (473388)
06-28-2008 6:15 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by randman
06-28-2008 3:53 PM


Re: growing public opinion of evos
Oh shit, the liberal media is against us, run!

Which of these do you think is false?

1) Stern was given notice of resignation 6 months before publication of the Meyer paper

2) He remained an employee of NIH

3) Stern didn't get his paper peer reviewed (as is required for publication in a peer reviewed journal, obviously), only reviewing it himself

So he got some mean emails? Oh the conspiracy!


This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by randman, posted 06-28-2008 3:53 PM randman has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by Wounded King, posted 06-28-2008 6:38 PM Alasdair has not yet responded

    
Wounded King
Member (Idle past 2172 days)
Posts: 4149
From: Edinburgh, Scotland
Joined: 04-09-2003


Message 17 of 22 (473390)
06-28-2008 6:38 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by Alasdair
06-28-2008 6:15 PM


Re: growing public opinion of evos
3) Stern didn't get his paper peer reviewed (as is required for publication in a peer reviewed journal, obviously), only reviewing it himself

I don't think there was any evidence that the paper wasn't submitted for peer review, although obviously we don't know who to and there is some contention as to how rigorous the process may have been. It has also been suggested that another editor of the journal should have been involved in the review process which is one of the issues the 'Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington' raised in their statement on the matter.

TTFN,

WK

Edited by Wounded King, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by Alasdair, posted 06-28-2008 6:15 PM Alasdair has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by AdminNosy, posted 06-28-2008 8:19 PM Wounded King has not yet responded

    
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 18 of 22 (473396)
06-28-2008 8:19 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by Wounded King
06-28-2008 6:38 PM


Stern is not the topic here
Stern is not the topic here. He's a lessor pwnie.

Edited by AdminNosy, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by Wounded King, posted 06-28-2008 6:38 PM Wounded King has not yet responded

  
Alasdair
Member (Idle past 3827 days)
Posts: 143
Joined: 05-13-2005


Message 19 of 22 (473399)
06-28-2008 9:04 PM


Back to making fun of Conservapedia!

http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Popularpages

Most popular pages!

# Atheism ‎(3,862,058 views)
# Homosexuality ‎(3,130,901 views)
# Main Page ‎(3,023,599 views)
# Wikipedia ‎(477,588 views)
# Homosexual Agenda ‎(336,583 views)
# Arguments Against Homosexuality ‎(334,368 views)
# Ex-homosexuals ‎(319,724 views)
# Examples of Bias in Wikipedia ‎(314,028 views)
# Theory of evolution ‎(312,783 views)
# Hillary Rodham Clinton ‎(266,253 views)

it's sort of ironic how obsessed they are with gay sex :D

Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Disable smilies, which were mucking up URL.


Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by AdminNosy, posted 06-29-2008 1:40 AM Alasdair has not yet responded

    
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 20 of 22 (473408)
06-29-2008 1:40 AM
Reply to: Message 19 by Alasdair
06-28-2008 9:04 PM


Not the topic either
Do we need to have this thread closed now?
This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Alasdair, posted 06-28-2008 9:04 PM Alasdair has not yet responded

  
Adminnemooseus
Director
Posts: 3879
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 21 of 22 (473417)
06-29-2008 2:51 AM


Not a "Links and Information" type topic
The "Links and Information" forum is problimatic. That forum is intended to be a collecting point for links, and not to be a debate forum. This topic started out properly, but not surprisingly turned into a (one sided?) debate topic.

Going to bounce this topic to the "News" forum.

Adminnemooseus


    
Adminnemooseus
Director
Posts: 3879
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 22 of 22 (473418)
06-29-2008 2:52 AM


Thread moved here from the Links and Information forum.
    
Prev1
2
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019