Tuffers writes:
es, I understand the idea of dots on a balloon (or raisins in a cake), although to my mind the dots are moving, because they are moving apart from each other as a consequence of the balloon enlarging. In other words, they are not moving under their own steam but they are hitching a ride on something else that's moving (the surface of the balloon in this case). That's why I still find it hard to get my head around the concept.
Actually galaxies also do move in regards to local gravitational forces as well, which is why you see some close by galaxies like Andromeda that are blue shift rather than red shifted. The local gravitational forces between our Milky Way and Andromeda are greater than the expansion forces of the expanding universe. However, this only works locally. The further we go out the faster the universe is expanding away from us. Like the balloon analogy if you put two dots really close to each they will not separate as much as if you put them on opposite sides of the balloon.
The 2 dimensional skin of the balloon in this analogy represents the 4 dimensions of spacetime itself in which everything in our universe resides. That is probably what is hanging you up. You cannot see, touch, feel, or taste the 4 dimensions of spacetime so it is hard for you to conceptualize. However we can detect it through the behavior or objects in space; specifically, the gravitational effects (relativistic effects such as rotating frames of reference, time dilation, relavistic dynamics, etc) of objects upon other objects in space. This is the whole idea behind the Theory of Relativity (both Special and General) proposed by Albert Einstein.
A good book to read that might shed some light on the matter for the average layman is 'The Fabric of the Cosmos: Space, Time, and the Texture of Reality' by Physicist Brian Greene.
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : correct misspellings and grammer
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.
One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we've been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We're no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It is simply too painful to acknowledge -- even to ourselves -- that we've been so credulous. - Carl Sagan, The Fine Art of Baloney Detection
"You can't convince a believer of anything; for their belief is not based on evidence, it's based on a deep seated need to believe." - Carl Sagan
"It is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring." - Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World