Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,924 Year: 4,181/9,624 Month: 1,052/974 Week: 11/368 Day: 11/11 Hour: 2/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   evidence of evolution in the bible?
Green44
Junior Member (Idle past 5129 days)
Posts: 7
Joined: 03-23-2010


Message 1 of 22 (551689)
03-23-2010 7:33 PM


Well to start I think most people know about the snake in the bible.
I do not want to discus talking snakes or a punished snake.,
Anyone who knows nothing about the snakes Fossil record I am sorry but I am not going to explain it.
This leads me to think that the man that wrote this small part of text had been influenced by science and/or a fossil record.
A past civilization that got to the point in science where they understood the fossil record as well as we do today,.and,....... they had been reduced to nothing after the great flood,. Then wrote about it in a vary Bias way. It would be a new start with out science to influence free thinking. a code of laws and warning to help us prepare for the next end of days. History proves to us that many great leaders of people are anything but nice.
I must stress that finding such proof of a past civilization would be impossible if it had all been tossed under the ocean.The time it takes the Ocean to decay things is frightfully fast. so after 4000? 6000? or more years would surly have eaten all evidence.
There is roads under the Ocean, its strange but, it seems only stone and earth can survive the test of time. And this proves nothing in terms of advanced people. whats your car look like after 5 years? old? rusty?
I only write this here in reason that I do think we had a past civilization that was advanced and it predates the bible. Everything in life has a history of evolution, animals , stars , Guns , swords , shoe's, the computer you are using,. It dont mater what it is, it has a common descent,.
But there is only one thing we know of that has no common descent, Our early technology. It simply is, with no past to explain it, I dont think we got visited by ancient astronauts I feel this is an insult to humans, we are much greater then that,.
thanks for reading,.

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by nwr, posted 03-24-2010 9:07 AM Green44 has not replied
 Message 4 by Hyroglyphx, posted 03-24-2010 9:51 AM Green44 has not replied
 Message 5 by Larni, posted 03-24-2010 1:55 PM Green44 has replied

  
Green44
Junior Member (Idle past 5129 days)
Posts: 7
Joined: 03-23-2010


(1)
Message 6 of 22 (551875)
03-24-2010 11:18 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by Larni
03-24-2010 1:55 PM


Its not the only reason, I was trying to keep my wall of text simple but I had more then one reason in there.
There's evidence of floods ,. Its not hard to find. I choose the flood and/or a Raging sun. as its the most reasonable civilization crusher to have come in cycles.
The useless pelvis in the snake I feel took more then an uneducated glance at a given species. The bones are pretty old for them to have lived at the same time when said species used to walk.
I know about old world Sumerians ect ect,. I like to think of them as the generations shortly after the rebuilding. all the old world build super structures that , when ya think about it can protect you from the suns deadly rays, and could survive a great flood... stone and earth, stone and earth,. cant beat it,. you could put a pyramid on the moon, an it would block the deadly cosmic rays...
These people must have been aware of deadly rays, an floods.. they may look like graves today, but they could save you from a out of control sun,. and If a flood just rinsed the place, the pyramids might still stand. They look like doomsday shelters...more or less to save there rich bloodline..
Anyway,.. I don't mind getting debunked,.. if its real science debunking me, then its out of my control and I have to change what I think,. an well,..... thats ok

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Larni, posted 03-24-2010 1:55 PM Larni has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by Larni, posted 03-25-2010 7:26 AM Green44 has replied

  
Green44
Junior Member (Idle past 5129 days)
Posts: 7
Joined: 03-23-2010


Message 9 of 22 (551897)
03-25-2010 3:45 AM
Reply to: Message 7 by Taz
03-25-2010 12:45 AM


Re: Elaborate the OP
I see no problems with rock dates, I went down the rabbit hole after learning about carbon 14 an stuff,. It turns out that they use close to 40 methods to date a rock then cross reference the data.
I allso found in the same rabbit hole that sediment layers are made horizontal and it can effect fossil dates,. but this is just a matter of old an young dates still,. its a horizontal wave pattern of all things,..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7exxtkN8610&feature=PlayL...
this video can give you the idea..
If it was not for the fact that anything we can think of can be put into a list of common descent I would think the the Fossil theory is flawed,. and it might be,. But I cant overlook how the concept has been used,. Our table of elements blows me away,. and star formation,. A real obvious one is the evolution of the rifle,. just amazing to see,. and read about. Its hard to think the Human race has no common descent in a universe that makes it so obvious.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by Taz, posted 03-25-2010 12:45 AM Taz has not replied

  
Green44
Junior Member (Idle past 5129 days)
Posts: 7
Joined: 03-23-2010


Message 11 of 22 (551977)
03-25-2010 3:19 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by Larni
03-25-2010 7:26 AM


Well I never did say world wide flood..The energy it would take for one single event like that is unrealistic. I think more along the line of many smaller events that came in cycles. some of witch would land a crushing blow to technology .

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by Larni, posted 03-25-2010 7:26 AM Larni has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by Theodoric, posted 03-25-2010 3:29 PM Green44 has not replied
 Message 13 by Larni, posted 03-25-2010 4:28 PM Green44 has not replied

  
Green44
Junior Member (Idle past 5129 days)
Posts: 7
Joined: 03-23-2010


Message 18 of 22 (552026)
03-25-2010 11:06 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by Phage0070
03-25-2010 10:29 PM


Re: Elaborate the OP
http://www.esd.ornl.gov/projects/qen/nercEURASIA.html
I try to use this information when speculating where humans may have been 50 thousand or so years ago or more. since its somewhere in this 20-50 thousand year bracket where we are missing a big part our common descent..
We have reasonable evidence for more primitive humans before and of course the history we been recording after. So evolution is present that much is for sure.
Im not trying to prove anything,. for me this is more of a conversation to try an understand our own descent. I feel evolution theory is obvious its just a matter of putting it in the right order.
The spot I like to take the most interest in, is the land mass that used to connect Australia and Asia. the sea level used to be around 100 meters lower exposing the land. The coast line south of Asia to Africa is a well known migration rout in the fossil records..
I didnt find a relevant source for any massive rings or a super structure to match your description. you have a link?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by Phage0070, posted 03-25-2010 10:29 PM Phage0070 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024