Salon Article: Texas Textbook Controversy

I'm a big Salon.com reader so I thought this article was neat: A textbook case of bad science | Salon.com

Tomorrow is the last day to sign up to testify at the September 10 meeting or to submit written testimony. (John is the only other one on this forum that I know is in Texas, but some of y'all could be lurkers.) I'm going to go. I'll even wear a tie.
Page not found | Texas Education Agency

Ray T. Perreault (aka Slouxdog) earlier today posted the following at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/evolutionversuscreationism/

quote:

---

Dear Friends of NCSE,

​

"Evolution is a normal part of science and should be treated the same way as all other scientific ideas." That was the message to Texas authorities from the authors of leading biology textbooks, delivered on August 8 in a statement jointly released by Texas Citizens for Science and the National Center for Science Education. The authors, who are scientists and educators, also stated, "It is a disservice to students to mislead them about the important position that evolution holds in biological and other sciences."

​

The Texas State Board of Education (SBoE) meets on Wednesday, September 10, in Austin for a second hearing on biology textbooks submitted for state adoption. As usual, the inclusion of evolution in the textbooks has elicited attacks from antievolutionists. The SBoE has been pressured by creationists to require publishers to "correct" supposed "errors" in the books -- but the only errors of concern to them involve the topic of evolution!

​

Because of court decisions in the 1980s and 1990s striking down the
advocacy of creation science in public schools, creationists have changed tactics. Instead of proposing that evolution be "balanced" by the teaching of creation science and other "scientific alternatives to
evolution," they are now proposing that evolution be "balanced" by the
teaching of "weaknesses of evolution." The result is that science
education and science literacy suffers.

​

"Making the 'corrections' of the textbooks recommended by the
antievolutionists would result in the production of substandard textbooks and substandard science education for Texas students," said NCSE Executive Director Dr. Eugenie C. Scott. "If publishers are required to make these changes, the Texas editions of these textbooks will be inferior to textbooks sold elsewhere, which will put Texas students at a disadvantage. Is this what the Texas SBoE wants?"

​

Texas Citizens for Science President Dr. Steven Schafersman added, "The 'corrections' that creationists want inserted into the books are
scientifically invalid, according to evolutionary biologists who are
familiar with the science. We want our Texas students to learn the
scientific consensus, which is that evolution occurred, though details
are debated. We don't want them taught creationist distortions of
science."

​

The biology textbook authors agree, explaining that the "coverage of
evolution in biology textbooks we have written reflects the broad
consensus in the scientific community. ...We deplore the efforts made in some states and districts to require that evolution be disclaimed. Such disclaimers single out evolution from all other scientific ideas as somehow less reliable or less accepted by scientists. Evolution is a normal part of science and should be treated the same way as all other scientific ideas. It does a disservice to students to mislead them about the important position that evolution holds in biological and other sciences."

​

For the complete statement and list of signatories, visit
http://www.ncseweb.org/.../articles/evolutionintextbooks.pdf on the NCSE web site.

​

Sincerely,

​

Glenn Branch
Deputy Director
National Center for Science Education, Inc.
420 40th Street, Suite 2
Oakland, CA 94609-2509
510-601-7203 x 305
fax: 510-601-7204
800-290-6006
branch@ncseweb.org
Apache2 Ubuntu Default Page: It works

---

I haven't recently reviewed the linked material cited in message 1. This may be redundant to that.Moose

Nope.