Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,911 Year: 4,168/9,624 Month: 1,039/974 Week: 366/286 Day: 9/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Drugs are for Everyone
onifre
Member (Idle past 2980 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 20 of 45 (587987)
10-21-2010 7:30 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Damouse
10-20-2010 6:39 PM


Drugs are great, mmkay
These people clearly are trying to adjust their state of mind.
Depending on the drug of course, but some users, esp. of psychedelic drugs, are trying to experience a different state of mind. They're not trying to adjust their mood, they're trying to experience a different reality.
Maybe this is the same thing as you were saying but it didn't seem right to me the way you wrote it.
"Soft" drugs likewise point to some sort of dissatisfaction with the user's current state.
Not at all. There is no dissatisfaction involved when you're at a Pink Floyd concert and having a great time. If you happen to smoke some pot while you're there it wasn't because you were dissatisfied; you just wanted to experience the concert in a different state of mind, but both equally satisfying.
Coffee, tobacco, alcohol, etc. The people who use and abuse these drug delivery systems are not partaking in their use for their taste, they are seeking a chemical change in their bodies and brains.
Enjoying a glass of wine and a cigar is partaking in their use for the taste, so not all people who use these products are in it for the chemical change.
The question is as follows: Why do we chase drugs?
Personally I like to experience different states of reality, some I like, some I don't care for. Its never had to do with being dissatisfied with a current state of mind, it's more of a curiousity as to what other state of mind are there.
does it stand to reason that as we evolve technologically and biologically, we will slowly lose the need to press buttons in our brains with chemicals?
I sure hope not, sounds rather boring to me.
But really, you should be asking if there will ever come a time when humanity isn't going to have to work ridiculous amounts of hours just to get by, which forces them to form a dependency on coffee and cigs. Coffee to stay awake because their job is boring and would make anyone fall asleep, and cigs so they don't kill their co-workers.
End that insanity and you'll see a huge reduction in dependency.
- Oni
Edited by onifre, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Damouse, posted 10-20-2010 6:39 PM Damouse has not replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2980 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 21 of 45 (587988)
10-21-2010 7:30 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Damouse
10-20-2010 6:39 PM


Drugs are great, mmkay
Double post
Edited by onifre, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Damouse, posted 10-20-2010 6:39 PM Damouse has not replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2980 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 22 of 45 (587993)
10-21-2010 7:59 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by Panda
10-21-2010 2:39 PM


Very few people can accurately describe drinking caffeinated coffee or smoking nicotine as pleasurable, except when describing the relief they feel from the symptons caused by the absence of the drug.
Have you ever heard of or been to a coffee tasting? Coffee isn't just coffee anymore. There are true, knowledgable aficionados in the coffee world who are ONLY in it for the taste.
The real reason people take "drugs" like nicotine and caffeine is because they work long hours, at boring jobs, are stressed out, and need a momentary outlet from the grind they're in.
Don't blame the coffee and the cigs, blame the shitty state of being most humans find themselves in.
- Oni
Edited by onifre, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by Panda, posted 10-21-2010 2:39 PM Panda has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 23 by Panda, posted 10-21-2010 9:05 PM onifre has replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2980 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 25 of 45 (588020)
10-22-2010 12:53 AM
Reply to: Message 23 by Panda
10-21-2010 9:05 PM


But caffeine and nicotine* offer little more than addiction.
But caffeine and nicotine are not the only things one gets from coffee and cigar products. Just like alcohol is not the only thing you get from wine.
Yes, there are a few coffee connoisseurs, but they are the exception.
Starbucks, just to name one giant in the coffee business, is all about the coffee experience. They don't sell coffee to a few connoisseurs, they sell to the majority of coffee drinkers. And they're NOT selling the caffeine to them, they're selling the taste of the brews and variety of different blends from all over the world.
You can have a negetaive opinion of caffeine as an addictive chemical, but not of the coffee.
I doubt if there are any cigarette connoisseurs.
Connoisseurs for cigs? No. But most smokers smoke a prefered brand and blend because of the taste. Some cigarettes, depending on how much you want to spend, taste very nice, esp. with some nice after dinner Scotch, as I like it. I also know plenty of people that have a cigarette of one of the better tasting brands just once or twice a day after a meal or with a drink.
IIRC: American Indians used to smoke a tobacco that got them completely off their face.
They laced the tobacco with other things, it wasn't the tobacco itself.
- Oni
Edited by onifre, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by Panda, posted 10-21-2010 9:05 PM Panda has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 27 by Omnivorous, posted 10-22-2010 1:26 AM onifre has replied
 Message 30 by Panda, posted 10-22-2010 5:51 AM onifre has replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2980 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 28 of 45 (588026)
10-22-2010 2:08 AM
Reply to: Message 27 by Omnivorous
10-22-2010 1:26 AM


Re: Nicotiana
Some of the wild native varieties (like Nicotiana rustica) have multiples of "normal" smoking tobacco's nicotine content, definitely potent enough to elicit visions and cause unconsciousness.
I guess when you're only familiar with the habits of a few maybe you shouldn't talk like you know the habits of all. My bad.
Thanks Omni, I stand corrected on the native folk's wacky tobacky.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by Omnivorous, posted 10-22-2010 1:26 AM Omnivorous has not replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2980 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 36 of 45 (588097)
10-22-2010 8:19 AM
Reply to: Message 30 by Panda
10-22-2010 5:51 AM


Do I have to explain to you that cigars and cigarettes are not the same? Really?
No, but if you were ONLY talking about cigarettes then you should have been specific, but you weren't.
You said:
Panda writes:
But caffeine and nicotine* offer little more than addiction.
Were in that does it indicate that you were only talking about cigarettes?
Could you please be specific about which 'things' you are referring to?
Taste and Aroma from many different tobacco products. They're also enjoyed when paired with food or drinks.
Marketing and addiction, eh? They are as clever as BAT.
Can you be specific as to how it's addiction?
Are you saying that anyone who has coffee a few times a week because they enjoy the taste and the experience in a coffee shop is addicted?
Would you say the same thing about someone who has a glass of wine in a wine-bar a few times a week for the taste and the experience in the wine-bar?
Better tasting brands? Not 'nice tasting', but 'better' tasting?
No, I meant better. If you smoke you know what's better and what's shit. There are some very well blended cigarettes these days that are better than the very cheap brands as far as taste goes.
Just like with scotch. A real scotch drinker will tell you which is better.
Preferred brand? Yes, based on which cigarettes taste the least offensive and/or have the best advertising.
Least offensive? Would you say the same about scotch? If not, why not?
Advertising? I don't think I have seen a cigarette advertisment in a long while.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by Panda, posted 10-22-2010 5:51 AM Panda has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 37 by Panda, posted 10-22-2010 10:07 AM onifre has replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2980 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 39 of 45 (588150)
10-22-2010 1:26 PM
Reply to: Message 37 by Panda
10-22-2010 10:07 AM


It is all releated to the definition of addiction. Strange that.
That's why I asked you to be specific as to how it's an addiction. If you're saying that someone is addicted because of the social atmosphere, then it has nothing to do with the caffeine, and you're using "addiction" very loosely. They could just be bored at home, lonely, and need to socialize.
If the social atmosphere in a coffee shop has that affect then how is that a negative or an addiction?
Better tasting brands? Not 'nice tasting', but 'better' tasting?
Umm, yup.
I would not say that same about scotch, as I have little knowledge of scotch.
Ok, wine, steak, beer, cigars, cheese - pick one, then answer the same question.
Least offensive? Would you say the same about ______? If not, why not?
You probably haven't changed your brand in a long while either.
Actually I have changed brands 3 times.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by Panda, posted 10-22-2010 10:07 AM Panda has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024