Summations Only

Inward Expansion? Don't you mean contraction?If you were right, then we'd have a lot of blue-shifted galaxies speeding towards us. But we don't, they're all red-shifted because they're moving away from us.

The air molecules that are moving inwards to the nozzle. Some of them will be moving towards other air molecules. Then many of the galaxies would be moving towards other ones. But when we look at the galaxies, almost every single one is moving away from us. If many of them were moving inwards, then we should see them doing that, but we don't.

If galaxies were following the same kind of pattern, then some of them would be moving towards us and they would be blue-shifted. The tip of the nozzle is smaller in size than the room it is sucking from. That means that some of the air molecules have to move towards each other.Here's a vortex: The portions to the right of the center are pointed towards the portions right below them. They are moving towards each other. If they were galaxies, one would appear blue-shifted to the other.

Okay, so we have a Vac in the center of a room. All the air is moving towards it. The air on the left side of the room is moving towards the center of the room and the air on the right side of the room is moving towards the center of the room. Therefore, the air on the left side of the room is moving towards the air on the right side of the room and the air on the right side of the room is moving towards the air on the left side of the room.Do you understand that? Not necessarily. Take an amount of an ideal gas and confine it to a fixed volume so that it cannot expand. Then, lower the temperature of that gas. The pressure lowers and the gas does not expand.PV=nRT If the case of our vortex example, things are moving towards each other in the X-Y plane (left or right and up or down on your computer screen), the direction they are moving away from each other is in the Z-direction (back into the depths of your screen). Before the air starts going into the vacuum, expanding into the depths of your screen, they are moving towards each other (from the left and right of the screen towards the center).Do you understand?

What you said was:

quote:

---

The only kind of expansion that accelerates is Inward.

---

That is a false statement. While the explosion is exploding, the expansion is accelerating outward. Your description has been proven wrong. If you were right, we would see a lot of blue shifted galaxies... but we don't.

Here's a donut: Its barycenter is in the middle of the hole. How could that have the highest average density when there is no mass there?

And they would be blue-shifted to each other, regardless of what is beyond the observable universe.Face it, your vortex idea is refuted.

The barycenter is the center of mass... its in the middle of the hole, the density there is zero.The average density for the donut only has one value, there is no greater or lesser one.

Well hold on... You're finally beginning to realize the error of your ways and now you want to run away from it?You're not going to get any respect with that attitude, Peter. Yes, I've read it. I've watched your youtube video. I'm familiar with your idea. I've already refuted it, it is wrong.And your 'Observational Evidence' is terribly weak. You don't have any reason to think the universe as a whole behaves like air flying towards a vacuum other than a few superficial similarities. Your argument is as inane as this:

• An apple is red, and shiny, and juicy, and it is a fruit.
  ​
• A firetruck is red and shiny, and its full of water thereby making it "juicy", therefore a firetruck is a fruit.

That's essentially what we're all dealing with here, Peter.