Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The black hole at the center of the Universe.
Peter Lamont
Member (Idle past 3973 days)
Posts: 147
Joined: 09-11-2012


Message 254 of 305 (700936)
06-09-2013 8:17 PM
Reply to: Message 221 by Panda
06-08-2013 11:44 AM


Re: Irony meter hits the peg...
Panmdas, I'm not interersted in this 'average density' thing. I'm getting kinda tired of answering your posts.
What I want to know is; Can you see beyond the Observable Universe?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 221 by Panda, posted 06-08-2013 11:44 AM Panda has not replied

  
Peter Lamont
Member (Idle past 3973 days)
Posts: 147
Joined: 09-11-2012


Message 255 of 305 (700937)
06-09-2013 8:22 PM
Reply to: Message 250 by Admin
06-09-2013 6:52 PM


Hi Admin, it's my fault - sometimes when I'm scrolling thru', I see something that I think needs an answer and only later I realise I've already answered. Sorry, I'll watch that!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 250 by Admin, posted 06-09-2013 6:52 PM Admin has seen this message but not replied

  
Peter Lamont
Member (Idle past 3973 days)
Posts: 147
Joined: 09-11-2012


Message 256 of 305 (700938)
06-09-2013 8:39 PM
Reply to: Message 252 by NoNukes
06-09-2013 8:03 PM


No Nukes, I'm not interested in current Theory Yopu ta;k about a Universe nobody can see - all we can see is the Observable Universe (OU).
You have an expansion that started fast, slowed down, and then accelerated. Allow me to tell you what happened...
...The expansion started slowly and has since accelerated - continuing to accelerate in the manner of any Inward expansion as I describe on page 1.
You talk about Space expanding around different objects, I talk about expansion as objects moving away from each other. My way's simpler, saying the same thing. Anyway, Space is a vacuum. How do you get a vacuum to expand?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 252 by NoNukes, posted 06-09-2013 8:03 PM NoNukes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 268 by NoNukes, posted 06-09-2013 10:14 PM Peter Lamont has replied

  
Peter Lamont
Member (Idle past 3973 days)
Posts: 147
Joined: 09-11-2012


Message 257 of 305 (700939)
06-09-2013 8:49 PM
Reply to: Message 226 by Panda
06-08-2013 12:51 PM


That's okay, panda. I can hold my own, especially against people like you.
I have the copyrite on this 'black hole where I say it is,' from the Library of Congress, Washington DC. fr5pom 2003.
There is a book, also, by me, about this black hole - Box 994 Oakville ON L6K 0B1.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 226 by Panda, posted 06-08-2013 12:51 PM Panda has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 260 by Coyote, posted 06-09-2013 9:01 PM Peter Lamont has replied

  
Peter Lamont
Member (Idle past 3973 days)
Posts: 147
Joined: 09-11-2012


Message 258 of 305 (700940)
06-09-2013 8:51 PM
Reply to: Message 228 by Percy
06-08-2013 1:41 PM


Re: Context
Percy, that video was not good.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 228 by Percy, posted 06-08-2013 1:41 PM Percy has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 264 by Panda, posted 06-09-2013 9:11 PM Peter Lamont has replied
 Message 272 by NoNukes, posted 06-10-2013 12:18 AM Peter Lamont has replied

  
Peter Lamont
Member (Idle past 3973 days)
Posts: 147
Joined: 09-11-2012


Message 259 of 305 (700943)
06-09-2013 9:01 PM
Reply to: Message 227 by JonF
06-08-2013 1:23 PM


JonF, you're right. I don't usually talk about 'weight', I prefer 'Mass'. but against such forces one does what one can.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 227 by JonF, posted 06-08-2013 1:23 PM JonF has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 274 by JonF, posted 06-10-2013 7:51 AM Peter Lamont has not replied

  
Peter Lamont
Member (Idle past 3973 days)
Posts: 147
Joined: 09-11-2012


Message 263 of 305 (700949)
06-09-2013 9:07 PM
Reply to: Message 240 by Percy
06-08-2013 8:07 PM


Percfy, look - I object to people saying "bullshit' in my thread. I'm trying to keep this scientific. Does that register with you?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 240 by Percy, posted 06-08-2013 8:07 PM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 275 by JonF, posted 06-10-2013 7:52 AM Peter Lamont has not replied
 Message 277 by Percy, posted 06-10-2013 8:20 AM Peter Lamont has not replied

  
Peter Lamont
Member (Idle past 3973 days)
Posts: 147
Joined: 09-11-2012


Message 265 of 305 (700952)
06-09-2013 9:25 PM
Reply to: Message 243 by JonF
06-09-2013 8:25 AM


Darwin had the same problem, JonF.
And where can I find an 'infinite' cloud of hydrogen?
Look, I agree the Observable Universe is expanding (exponentially, in my opinion) and that the expansion is accelerating and continuing to accelerate, in the manner of any Inward expansion, explained in my "Observational Evidence' on page 1.
And I'm glad to hear you admit you can't see past the Observable Universe. I can't either.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 243 by JonF, posted 06-09-2013 8:25 AM JonF has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 276 by JonF, posted 06-10-2013 7:54 AM Peter Lamont has not replied

  
Peter Lamont
Member (Idle past 3973 days)
Posts: 147
Joined: 09-11-2012


Message 266 of 305 (700953)
06-09-2013 9:25 PM
Reply to: Message 243 by JonF
06-09-2013 8:25 AM


Darwin had the same problem, JonF.
And where can I find an 'infinite' cloud of hydrogen?
Look, I agree the Observable Universe is expanding (exponentially, in my opinion) and that the expansion is accelerating and continuing to accelerate, in the manner of any Inward expansion, explained in my "Observational Evidence' on page 1.
And I'm glad to hear you admit you can't see past the Observable Universe. I can't either.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 243 by JonF, posted 06-09-2013 8:25 AM JonF has not replied

  
Peter Lamont
Member (Idle past 3973 days)
Posts: 147
Joined: 09-11-2012


Message 267 of 305 (700954)
06-09-2013 10:07 PM
Reply to: Message 252 by NoNukes
06-09-2013 8:03 PM


Well said, No Nukes.
The Universe this, and the Universe that - how can you talk about the Universe, when all we can see is the Observable Universe (OU)?
The Universe is flat? Who decided that?
Or maybe, No Nukes, I'm wrong about you, maybe you can see beyond the OU? why won't you tell me?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 252 by NoNukes, posted 06-09-2013 8:03 PM NoNukes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 271 by NoNukes, posted 06-09-2013 11:51 PM Peter Lamont has replied

  
Peter Lamont
Member (Idle past 3973 days)
Posts: 147
Joined: 09-11-2012


Message 269 of 305 (700956)
06-09-2013 10:18 PM
Reply to: Message 261 by Percy
06-09-2013 9:02 PM


Re: Context
Percy, you're telling me the Universe did this and that - but you can't see the Universe any more than I can. All we can know about is the Observable Universe.
Nobody can see the Universe, tho' many pretend. We should confine ourselves to discussing the Observable Universe and its 'accelerating expansion.' That's what's important.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 261 by Percy, posted 06-09-2013 9:02 PM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 279 by Percy, posted 06-10-2013 8:45 AM Peter Lamont has not replied

  
Peter Lamont
Member (Idle past 3973 days)
Posts: 147
Joined: 09-11-2012


Message 283 of 305 (700994)
06-10-2013 1:22 PM
Reply to: Message 268 by NoNukes
06-09-2013 10:14 PM


Re: What's wrong with you?
No Nukes, the expansion began slowly (as in the Big-Wheeze) and has since accelerated. The expansion continues to accelerate in the manner of any Inward Expansion - Outward Expansions all slow down and stop.
I explain all this in my 'Observational Evidence on page 1. I wish you would read it.
As for the CBR, I explain that in my very first post. It's all around us, perfectly smooth (COBE) and slightly pinker at one end than the other. It's left-over heat from the time the Universe was evolving.
If we were falling into an ongoing attractive Central Point, the actual mechanics of the situation might surprise you. You talk about 'spaghettification' that supposedly might occur as you accrete onto a black hole. We are not at that stage yet.
Acceleration leads to Loss of Pressure and that's Expansion - where everything is moving away from everything else. Any expanding system, in the absence of any outside forces, will expand evenly. That's not me - that's Physics 101.
And those stars that are leaving us at the speed of light, we don't see them, we see where they were - a few thousand years ago. It takes that long for the light to travel (red-shifted of course) to us here on Earth.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 268 by NoNukes, posted 06-09-2013 10:14 PM NoNukes has not replied

  
Peter Lamont
Member (Idle past 3973 days)
Posts: 147
Joined: 09-11-2012


Message 285 of 305 (701000)
06-10-2013 2:23 PM
Reply to: Message 260 by Coyote
06-09-2013 9:01 PM


Coyote, welcome to my thread. You see, I believe in Gravity. Gravity built the Universe, and Gravity runs it. It's Gravity that keeps the Moon orbiting Earth, not Anti-Gravity.
Yes, the rest of the world thinks the Universe is operated by Ant-Gravity. They say Anti-Gravity is pushing the Universe apart. Now, if you push something, you're going to get Compression and Compaction - both warming effects.
Now, if you pull something - there is always the danger you might pull it apart. Anyway, if you pull it, there's going to be de-compression, and even expansion, both cooling effects. We're cooling down, as I
hope you know.
Anyway, nice chatting to you. Hope you get back to me.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 260 by Coyote, posted 06-09-2013 9:01 PM Coyote has not replied

  
Peter Lamont
Member (Idle past 3973 days)
Posts: 147
Joined: 09-11-2012


Message 286 of 305 (701001)
06-10-2013 2:23 PM
Reply to: Message 260 by Coyote
06-09-2013 9:01 PM


Coyote, welcome to my thread. You see, I believe in Gravity. Gravity built the Universe, and Gravity runs it. It's Gravity that keeps the Moon orbiting Earth, not Anti-Gravity.
Yes, the rest of the world thinks the Universe is operated by Ant-Gravity. They say Anti-Gravity is pushing the Universe apart. Now, if you push something, you're going to get Compression and Compaction - both warming effects.
Now, if you pull something - there is always the danger you might pull it apart. Anyway, if you pull it, there's going to be de-compression, and even expansion, both cooling effects. We're cooling down, as I
hope you know.
Anyway, nice chatting to you. Hope you get back to me.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 260 by Coyote, posted 06-09-2013 9:01 PM Coyote has not replied

  
Peter Lamont
Member (Idle past 3973 days)
Posts: 147
Joined: 09-11-2012


Message 287 of 305 (701003)
06-10-2013 2:25 PM
Reply to: Message 260 by Coyote
06-09-2013 9:01 PM


Coyote, welcome to my thread. You see, I believe in Gravity. Gravity built the Universe, and Gravity runs it. It's Gravity that keeps the Moon orbiting Earth, not Anti-Gravity.
Yes, the rest of the world thinks the Universe is operated by Ant-Gravity. They say Anti-Gravity is pushing the Universe apart. Now, if you push something, you're going to get Compression and Compaction - both warming effects.
Now, if you pull something - there is always the danger you might pull it apart. Anyway, if you pull it, there's going to be de-compression, and even expansion, both cooling effects. We're cooling down, as I
hope you know.
Anyway, nice chatting to you. Hope you get back to me.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 260 by Coyote, posted 06-09-2013 9:01 PM Coyote has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024