Hello everyone

Season of goodwill to all men (and women) aside; you're a blithering idiot.

Tiny, weeny little point here Faith that I wouldn't normally bother about, but when you're talking about rocks, it's geologists not 'evolutionists' you have a problem with.I only mention it because you tend to think that 'evolutionist' is a synonym or satan so I'd just like you to spread the evil around a bit.

Right.The world's geologist's and the world's biologists are all in cahoots to spread a lie about both how rocks form and how organisms evolve. Odd how those two quite different disciplines manage to make a coherent and inter-locking story, but that's just lucky i guess.These days of course, in order to maintain these great conspiracies the biologists had to recruit the chemists too so that the stuff being discovered about molecular genetics doesn't screw thing up for them.It was a clever move getting the physicists to invent all that radio dating stuff too - they didn't have to of course, some say it's overkill but it all adds power to the conspiracy.And what a stroke of luck that astronomers joined the conspiracy of an old age universe without even being asked!It's the most successful conspiracy of all time: it's independent of political party, religion, gender, race, and country and it's held up for a couple of centuries. It even seems to work in the real world - finding oil, making drugs, sending mechanical objects far into space.As a conspiracy, it's so successful that it's indistinguishable from reality. And yet, you, armed with only a computer, access to the intertubes and a 2,000 year old book of myths have seen straight through this enormous scam.Or maybe, just maybe, you're wrong?

But you *should* have something against geologists because they decided that the earth was old *before* the satan Darwin came along with his evil ideas.

I don't mind at all Faith, not at all.By saying 'it conveys what you want to convey' despite it being factually incorrect at a very basic level, you just demostrate perfectly your dishonest approach.By calling geologists, chemists, physicists and astronomers 'evolutionists' that are all involved in a global conspiarcy, you just promote your prejudice and bias.

Really, so when you said this: It just means that they're all just stupid and wrong?An 'evolutionist' is an anti-science, creationist, label which appears to mean anyone of any discipline that accepts evolution. This is a descriptor of virtually every scientist on the planet so it really doesn't define anyone at all.ALL of science is against you so you might as well stick to standard labels and just call the ones that actually study evolution biologists so we're clear which particular branch of science you're trying to slander.

Chemists show that your DNA is 98% the same as a chimp, thus showing that people and other apes are related as predicted by the ToE. Physicists prove that the age of the earth is greater than 4,500 years using radiometric dating Astronomers put the age of the universe at 14bn years Really? You now accept these sciences as valid? Are you sure?

So they're wrong when they're making claims about the past but right at all other times.What is it, do you think, that makes them so stupid studying yesterday but clever at studying today?No matter, tomorrow your DNA will still look 98% the same as a chimp's, stars will be only a tiny bit older and radioactive isotopes will decay at the same rate and in the same pattern.We can add too, that trees will add another ring, ice will form another layer, diatoms will sink to the lake floor and corals will add more calcite in annual growth patterns.And in a few thousand years time some chemist/physicist/biologist/archaeologist/geologist will look at them all and not be in the slightest bit surprised to find that all the dates agree. Just like they do today.